Difference between revisions of "Forum:Volcanic-Flamvell Burn, opinions wanted"
(→Here It Is: new section) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I think I understand how this Deck works, but I certainly have no idea what [[Flamvell Magician]] does that [[Flamvell Gurnika]] doesn't do better. | I think I understand how this Deck works, but I certainly have no idea what [[Flamvell Magician]] does that [[Flamvell Gurnika]] doesn't do better. | ||
[[User:Designless Square|Designless Square]] ([[User talk:Designless Square|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Designless Square|contribs]]) 22:08, December 31, 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Designless Square|Designless Square]] ([[User talk:Designless Square|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Designless Square|contribs]]) 22:08, December 31, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ahh, thank you. I was in a bit of a hurry when I made the post XP and yeah, I was wondering why Flamvell Magician was in the deck at all. I'd rather take them out and add a Gurnika. Opinions on spell/traps? [[Special:Contributions/24.5.249.73|24.5.249.73]] ([[User talk:24.5.249.73|talk]]) 00:37, January 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I would add another "[[Burden of the Mighty]]" and maybe [[Lava Golem]]. You could remove "[[Bottomless Trap Hole]]." | ||
| + | [[User:Designless Square|Designless Square]] ([[User talk:Designless Square|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Designless Square|contribs]]) 01:25, January 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Alright, thanks. I unfortunately don't have enough money for a Solemn Judgement, could you recommend any replacements? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Er, perhaps [[Solemn Warning]] may be suitable? It only works with Special Summons, though... [[Seven Tools of the Bandit]] is Trap-only... perhaps [[Dark Bribe]]? [[User:AllanAokage|AllanAokage]] ([[User talk:AllanAokage|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AllanAokage|contribs]]) 02:38, January 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Solemn Warning is a lot more expensive, though =| Seven Tools could work. Thanks for the suggestions. Should I use tri-blaze accelerators, and only two blaze accels? [[Special:Contributions/24.5.249.73|24.5.249.73]] ([[User talk:24.5.249.73|talk]]) 02:45, January 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Flamvell Magician]] is a Tuner. so you go [[Rekindling]] for 2 magician & 2 firedog & then sync for 8 twice, or you go Firedog attack, summon magician, sync for 8. as for [[Blaze Accelerator]], you only need 1, due to 3 rockets, and 0 tri-blaze, as they don't really help...-[[User:Resk|Resk]] ([[User talk:Resk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Resk|contribs]]) 03:47, January 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :So I gathered. The Deck was complete, though, and contained no Extra Deck, which led me to believe that there was no Synchro Summoning in this Deck. Let's work on that. | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Poun]] (1): On death, searches for monster with 200 DEF | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Guard]] ''♪'' (1): Normal Monster; 2000 DEF | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Baby]] ''♪'' (1): Can drop itself into the Graveyard (confers small boost) | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Archer]] ''♪'' (3): Can sacrifice a [[Pyro]] to boost all Flamvells by 800 until End Phase | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Magician]] ''♪'' (4): Effect is absurd | ||
| + | :The [[archetype]]'s [[Synchro]] is as follows: | ||
| + | *[[Flamvell Uruquizas]] (6): [2100/400] Piercing; gains 300 when he inflicts damage | ||
| + | *[[Synchro Material Monsters|Material]]: [Archer + Counter], [Archer + 3x Shell/Poun]] [Magician + 2x Shell/Poun], [Guard/Baby + Counter + 2xShell/Poun], [Guard/Baby + Firedog/Grunika/Rocket/Monk + Shell/Poun] | ||
| + | :...so it's pretty much up to generic Synchros to save the day. Which ones? | ||
| + | [[User:Designless Square|Designless Square]] ([[User talk:Designless Square|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Designless Square|contribs]]) 05:35, January 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | the ususal, | ||
| + | *[[Mist Wurm]] | ||
| + | *[[Stardust Dragon]] x2, | ||
| + | *[[Colossal Fighter]] | ||
| + | *[[Red Dragon Archfiend]] | ||
| + | *[[Scrap Dragon]] | ||
| + | *[[Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier]] | ||
| + | *[[Goyo Guardian]] | ||
| + | *[[Ally of Justice Catastor]] | ||
| + | *[[Magical Android]] | ||
| + | * & whatever | ||
| + | |||
| + | -[[User:Resk|Resk]] ([[User talk:Resk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Resk|contribs]]) 12:34, January 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:34, 2 January 2011
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck Help → Volcanic-Flamvell Burn, opinions wanted Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 4901 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
So, I was thinking of using the deck listed here: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Decks_For_Free!/Deck_Gallery_U-Z (only Vol-Flam deck listed). I'm worried about the spells and traps on it and how it would work out, with no tri-blaze, 3 hand destructions, and only a few staple traps. I'm probably just worrying for nothing, since I have no experience with burn decks at all. So opinions on the deck as it is there would be great! Or, a whole different burn deck you believe would work better would be great. Also, I'm curious about how this deck would stack up in today's meta. My locals as I've seen usually runs lightsworns, blackwings, and some gravekeepers. Thank you for helping! 24.5.249.73 (talk) 06:38, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Here It Is
You should have posted the Decklist. No worries, I have it here:
Volcanic-Flamvell Hybrid by Tantara
|
|---|
|
I think I understand how this Deck works, but I certainly have no idea what Flamvell Magician does that Flamvell Gurnika doesn't do better.
Designless Square (talk • contribs) 22:08, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Ahh, thank you. I was in a bit of a hurry when I made the post XP and yeah, I was wondering why Flamvell Magician was in the deck at all. I'd rather take them out and add a Gurnika. Opinions on spell/traps? 24.5.249.73 (talk) 00:37, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- I would add another "Burden of the Mighty" and maybe Lava Golem. You could remove "Bottomless Trap Hole."
Designless Square (talk • contribs) 01:25, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
Alright, thanks. I unfortunately don't have enough money for a Solemn Judgement, could you recommend any replacements?
Er, perhaps Solemn Warning may be suitable? It only works with Special Summons, though... Seven Tools of the Bandit is Trap-only... perhaps Dark Bribe? AllanAokage (talk • contribs) 02:38, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
Solemn Warning is a lot more expensive, though =| Seven Tools could work. Thanks for the suggestions. Should I use tri-blaze accelerators, and only two blaze accels? 24.5.249.73 (talk) 02:45, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
Flamvell Magician is a Tuner. so you go Rekindling for 2 magician & 2 firedog & then sync for 8 twice, or you go Firedog attack, summon magician, sync for 8. as for Blaze Accelerator, you only need 1, due to 3 rockets, and 0 tri-blaze, as they don't really help...-Resk (talk • contribs) 03:47, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- So I gathered. The Deck was complete, though, and contained no Extra Deck, which led me to believe that there was no Synchro Summoning in this Deck. Let's work on that.
- Flamvell Poun (1): On death, searches for monster with 200 DEF
- Flamvell Guard ♪ (1): Normal Monster; 2000 DEF
- Flamvell Baby ♪ (1): Can drop itself into the Graveyard (confers small boost)
- Flamvell Archer ♪ (3): Can sacrifice a Pyro to boost all Flamvells by 800 until End Phase
- Flamvell Magician ♪ (4): Effect is absurd
- Flamvell Uruquizas (6): [2100/400] Piercing; gains 300 when he inflicts damage
- Material: [Archer + Counter], [Archer + 3x Shell/Poun]] [Magician + 2x Shell/Poun], [Guard/Baby + Counter + 2xShell/Poun], [Guard/Baby + Firedog/Grunika/Rocket/Monk + Shell/Poun]
- ...so it's pretty much up to generic Synchros to save the day. Which ones?
Designless Square (talk • contribs) 05:35, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
the ususal,
