Difference between revisions of "Talk:Number 22: Zombiestein"
(→Card lore) |
(→Card lore) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Guess, you're right. But it still seems broken. And did they really say it was a female. That thing looks like an "it", not a "she".--[[User:Xicokiko|Xicokiko]] ([[User talk:Xicokiko|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Xicokiko|contribs]]) 22:17, April 18, 2012 (UTC) | Guess, you're right. But it still seems broken. And did they really say it was a female. That thing looks like an "it", not a "she".--[[User:Xicokiko|Xicokiko]] ([[User talk:Xicokiko|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Xicokiko|contribs]]) 22:17, April 18, 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Some duelists said "I activate her effect" or something, dunno, just ask that user who brought it up. --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100#top|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 22:18, April 18, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:18, 18 April 2012
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Number 22: Zombiestein. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Card lore
There's already a lore for this card on the page. But where is the proof? That effect and number of materials seem to be too good for those gigantic 4500 atk points. I think the lore should be removed until proof is presented.--Xicokiko (talk • contribs) 22:01, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- It's Manga Lore... Sure they will nerf it down to weakly version, or improve the Materials' requirement (like with "Thunder End Dragon") --FredCat 22:06, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
Guess, you're right. But it still seems broken. And did they really say it was a female. That thing looks like an "it", not a "she".--Xicokiko (talk • contribs) 22:17, April 18, 2012 (UTC)