Difference between revisions of "Talk:D/D"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Talkheader}} |
== How should this be handled == | == How should this be handled == | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Leaving only "DDDs" in the "DDD" article is perfect, since "DDs" are not "DDDs". But I think it'd be nice to have both "DDs" and "DDDs" in the "DD" article because "DDDs" are "DDs" as well. [[User:LegendaryAsariUgetsu|LegendaryAsariUgetsu]] ([[User talk:LegendaryAsariUgetsu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LegendaryAsariUgetsu|contribs]]) 14:34, June 30, 2014 (UTC) | ::Leaving only "DDDs" in the "DDD" article is perfect, since "DDs" are not "DDDs". But I think it'd be nice to have both "DDs" and "DDDs" in the "DD" article because "DDDs" are "DDs" as well. [[User:LegendaryAsariUgetsu|LegendaryAsariUgetsu]] ([[User talk:LegendaryAsariUgetsu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LegendaryAsariUgetsu|contribs]]) 14:34, June 30, 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | ==Recommended cards== | ||
I think in the Recommended cards section of the article, in effect monsters, [[The Dark - Hex-Sealed Fusion]] should be added as an option. | I think in the Recommended cards section of the article, in effect monsters, [[The Dark - Hex-Sealed Fusion]] should be added as an option. | ||
In case someone builds a deck that relies heavily on the Fusion Overlords of the series (makes sense), they may find it quite handy, it could even replace some slots of the [[Covenant with the Swamp King]]; The latter being costly and not wanted like the other Covenants in every round anyway -it ends up being a burden. | In case someone builds a deck that relies heavily on the Fusion Overlords of the series (makes sense), they may find it quite handy, it could even replace some slots of the [[Covenant with the Swamp King]]; The latter being costly and not wanted like the other Covenants in every round anyway -it ends up being a burden. | ||
So, Hex Sealed Fusion: the fusing card and one of the matterials also. All you need is a d/d to go for one of the two fusion overlords. | So, Hex Sealed Fusion: the fusing card and one of the matterials also. All you need is a d/d to go for one of the two fusion overlords. | ||
--[[User:Igioh yougioh hegioh|Igioh yougioh hegioh]] ([[User talk:Igioh yougioh hegioh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Igioh yougioh hegioh|contribs]]) 04:17, July 3, 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Igioh yougioh hegioh|Igioh yougioh hegioh]] ([[User talk:Igioh yougioh hegioh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Igioh yougioh hegioh|contribs]]) 04:17, July 3, 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It shouldn't be added. [[Fusion Substitute Monster]]s can only be used to replace monsters whose '''exact names''' are listed in the Fusion Monster's material requirements. All the Fusion Monsters in this archetype (currently) only list partial names, like "2 'D/D' monsters" or "2 'D/D/D' monsters", so it wouldn't work. --[[User:UltimateKuriboh|UltimateKuriboh]] ([[User talk:UltimateKuriboh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UltimateKuriboh|contribs]]) 04:34, July 3, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:34, 3 July 2015
|
This is the talk page for discussing the page, D/D. | |
|---|---|
|
Please try to
|
How should this be handled
Based on "Arc-V 012", DD stands for "Different Dimension" while DDD stands for "Different Dimension D(a)emon". But since we already have a series named "Different Dimension", what should be done with this one, since its different from the other one and can't be mixed together.--Supratim1986 (talk • contribs) 11:22, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing, as far as I can see. There's no reason we can't just leave this at "DD". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:53, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- "DD" is an archetype. There's no meaning in renaming it or mixing it with another archetype/series. The other "D.D." has dots in English, and a completely different name in Japanese (and well, it's not an archetype). LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 19:10, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
Picture
Say, to illustrate the article... I know colored pics are better, but in this case wouldn't the manga one be better? It shows Reiji as well, shows more monsters, and shows both "DD" and "DDD" monsters. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 19:10, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- But since both the "DD" and "DDD" are differently categorized, i think that it would be better to use an image which shows only "DD" monster for this article (whether it be from manga or anime). Similarly, an image which shows only "DDD" monster showed be posted in the "DDD" page.--Supratim1986 (talk • contribs) 10:55, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Leaving only "DDDs" in the "DDD" article is perfect, since "DDs" are not "DDDs". But I think it'd be nice to have both "DDs" and "DDDs" in the "DD" article because "DDDs" are "DDs" as well. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 14:34, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
Recommended cards
I think in the Recommended cards section of the article, in effect monsters, The Dark - Hex-Sealed Fusion should be added as an option. In case someone builds a deck that relies heavily on the Fusion Overlords of the series (makes sense), they may find it quite handy, it could even replace some slots of the Covenant with the Swamp King; The latter being costly and not wanted like the other Covenants in every round anyway -it ends up being a burden. So, Hex Sealed Fusion: the fusing card and one of the matterials also. All you need is a d/d to go for one of the two fusion overlords. --Igioh yougioh hegioh (talk • contribs) 04:17, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be added. Fusion Substitute Monsters can only be used to replace monsters whose exact names are listed in the Fusion Monster's material requirements. All the Fusion Monsters in this archetype (currently) only list partial names, like "2 'D/D' monsters" or "2 'D/D/D' monsters", so it wouldn't work. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:34, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
