Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vampire Lord"
(→possible card description error: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, [[Old Vindictive Magician]] and [[Man-Eater Bug]] will trigger the effect of this card to Special Summon it during your standby phase. As long as it is sent to the graveyard by your opponent's card, other than by battle, it will Summon itself. [[User:Messengerofthedark|DemonGodAsura]] 04:07, January 4, 2010 (UTC) | :Yes, [[Old Vindictive Magician]] and [[Man-Eater Bug]] will trigger the effect of this card to Special Summon it during your standby phase. As long as it is sent to the graveyard by your opponent's card, other than by battle, it will Summon itself. [[User:Messengerofthedark|DemonGodAsura]] 04:07, January 4, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == possible card description error == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I run into a contradictory with this card. Even when card rulings state that its effect activate even if its destroyed in hand or deck, its picture and Card Description(s) state that he must be destroyed on a field. Also none of this cards errata has that condition. Can someone check this and correct it if needed? | ||
Revision as of 20:41, 17 November 2010
ok im kinda confused. this cards says, if this card is sent to the graveyard by ur opponents card effect special summon it back to uf field ur next stand by phase..does this mean a trap or spell card or a monsters effect like Old Vin Mag or man eater bug? any answer would help please
- Yes, Old Vindictive Magician and Man-Eater Bug will trigger the effect of this card to Special Summon it during your standby phase. As long as it is sent to the graveyard by your opponent's card, other than by battle, it will Summon itself. DemonGodAsura 04:07, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
possible card description error
I run into a contradictory with this card. Even when card rulings state that its effect activate even if its destroyed in hand or deck, its picture and Card Description(s) state that he must be destroyed on a field. Also none of this cards errata has that condition. Can someone check this and correct it if needed?
