Difference between revisions of "Forum:Jade knight question"
(→Answer) |
(→another answer: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
jade knight hasn't got a spell speed 1 effect, it has got a continues effect, and it hasn't got spell speed, its effect doesn't start a chain, is applyed until it remains face-up on the field ^^ | jade knight hasn't got a spell speed 1 effect, it has got a continues effect, and it hasn't got spell speed, its effect doesn't start a chain, is applyed until it remains face-up on the field ^^ | ||
| + | |||
| + | == another answer == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oops, I thought it was a Trigger effect, my bad, sorry.--[[Special:Contributions/91.95.255.117|91.95.255.117]] 14:43, October 22, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 22 October 2009
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → Jade knight question Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5325 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
hi, i'm italian, i don't speak english xDxDxD
i have Jade knight (http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Jade_Knight) and another machine monster with 1200 atk or less. if i active the effect of the other monster, my opponent can active divine wrath???? if he can, my machine monster is destroyed????? if it isn't destroyed, its effect is negated????
i hope you understand xDxDxD
Answer
Well, since Divine Wrath is a Counter Trap-card (Spell speed 3) it can negate the activation of your other monster card and destroy it. Your other monster is destroyed because Jade Knights effect isn't "fast enough" to negate the activation. (Jade Knight = Spell Speed 1. Counter Trap Cards = Spell Speed 3)--91.95.255.117 14:13, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
Answer
jade knight hasn't got a spell speed 1 effect, it has got a continues effect, and it hasn't got spell speed, its effect doesn't start a chain, is applyed until it remains face-up on the field ^^
another answer
Oops, I thought it was a Trigger effect, my bad, sorry.--91.95.255.117 14:43, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
