Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stun"
Golden Key (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Stun (Anti-Meta) to Talk:Stun: There's no other "Stun" page to get it confused with.) |
Dinobot1000 (talk | contribs) (update talk header) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Talk header}} |
== add to Anti Meta Page == | == add to Anti Meta Page == |
Latest revision as of 23:26, 2 March 2024
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Stun. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
add to Anti Meta Page[edit]
add to Anti Meta Page that just all to say about it--41.35.149.209 (talk) 03:41, April 9, 2011 (UTC)slifer
Agree[edit]
I believe this page should just be added to the Anti-Meta page. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 01:59, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so; a Stun deck is rather unique among anti-meta, especially if we talk about the classic King Tiger Wanghu stun. I say keep it, but clarify it with the different types of stun, like Wanghu Stun, Rock Stun, etc. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 01:31, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
I think Neo-Spacian Grand Mole should be added to the recommended cards list. You can use it whenever you need it and reveal it every turn what not?