Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Closed Eight"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Deletion== Shouldn't we delete this, since it hasn't been official/confirmed for 2 months or something, and it will probably never be used --~~~~")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Talkheader}}
 +
 
==Deletion==
 
==Deletion==
  
 
Shouldn't we delete this, since it hasn't been official/confirmed for 2 months or something, and it will probably never be used --[[User:StephenWalker97|StephenWalker97]] ([[User talk:StephenWalker97|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/StephenWalker97|contribs]]) 20:59, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
Shouldn't we delete this, since it hasn't been official/confirmed for 2 months or something, and it will probably never be used --[[User:StephenWalker97|StephenWalker97]] ([[User talk:StephenWalker97|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/StephenWalker97|contribs]]) 20:59, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
:No, because it was officially confirmed via NAS itself, it may not have been used in the show but it is official, merely unused. Consider those previews to be ret-conned. IF NAS said they didn't put them up there and it was a hacker that would be a different story but thus far it looks like they have just changed there minds a lot and possibly a very disgruntled employee --<span style="color:#00F; font-family: Garamond; font-size: 9pt">[[User:Sardeth42|''slave'']]<small>([[User talk:Sardeth42|command]]•[[Special:Contributions/Sardeth42|works]])</small></span> 22:54, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:54, 17 December 2013

This is the talk page for discussing the page, The Closed Eight.

Please try to

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Be welcoming

Deletion

Shouldn't we delete this, since it hasn't been official/confirmed for 2 months or something, and it will probably never be used --StephenWalker97 (talkcontribs) 20:59, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

No, because it was officially confirmed via NAS itself, it may not have been used in the show but it is official, merely unused. Consider those previews to be ret-conned. IF NAS said they didn't put them up there and it was a hacker that would be a different story but thus far it looks like they have just changed there minds a lot and possibly a very disgruntled employee --slave(commandworks) 22:54, December 17, 2013 (UTC)