Talk:Genesis Omega Dragon

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Genesis Omega Dragon.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

So...

How should we handle this card? I mean, yeah, we need an info article like this for it, but since it /is/ a card, we also need a card article for it, right? Should we create two separate articles, like "Genesis Omega Dragon" for the card and "Genesis Omega Dragon (item)" for the info? Also, in which chapters do we consider this card to have been "featured"? The back of it appeared in 4, and in 15 we got that other pic that's shown in the article. I think we list it as featured only in 15 and 18? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 17:52, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

Idk, you could possibly look to Numeron Code as precedent. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:25, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with LAU, I was thinking the same thing. And UK, this is different: GOD appears to be an actual usable card, while the Numeron Code just looks like one. --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 18:28, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, also Yuya explained it is the ultimate monster, and the pic from chapter 15 shows an actual Level and lore, so it's clear that this is a different case. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:40, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

It also appeared in Scale 17 as part of a flashback. However, the detailing on the image from 17 suggests it's a Pendulum monster, where as the one presently on the article suggests it isn't. So that's something that would need to be decided, as to which we go with. PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 18:42, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

As for the article, since it probably won't fully appear ina Duel until much later, I propose that the main page talks about the plot around it, the actual card info goes on "Genesis Omega Dragon (card)", and as for the appearance we go like usual and ignore backing-only appearances. --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 18:45, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

Oh, true, it appears in 17 too. Though, in both 15 and 17, it only appears as a blank-ish shining thing with nearly anything visible, while in 18, we can see something of the card clearly for the first time. I'm not sure whether we count only 18 as an appearance or 15 and 17 as well. As for Pendulum or not, we should probably wait for confirmation. Since, so far, the only thing we know for sure is its name, we should just list its name and nothing else, or that would be speculation. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 12:36, January 22, 2017 (UTC)