Talk:Number 73: Abyss Splash

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Number 73: Abyss Splash.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Shadow of No.73

Could this shadow revealed in Dual-ism of Mirrors be possibly of No.73..--Supratim1986 (talk • contribs) 18:44, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

In the future, please upload the image to a site like imgur.com and provide the link here, instead of uploading to the Wikia to just be used for this 1 page. As to your question, do you see the number "73" on it? If no, then it should not be used as an image for "Number 73: Abyss Splash the Roaring Waterfall Deity", since it is still unofficial. (Keep in mind that although it may be "Number 73", it is not going to be used as an image until we have proof that it is "Number 73".) --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:48, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

With all due respect, wasn't there an unconfirmed image used for Number C96?

NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 03:39, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Image

Can't we replace this image with one for the monster? You can clearly see it in the preview. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 19:49, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Why is this being ignored? It makes sense to have the most visible image represent the m0nster, right? --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 04:21, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Card images are preferred, so long as they aren't tiny and blurry to the point of ridiculousness. This card image isn't blurry enough to be replaced by a picture of the actual monster. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:33, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

I agreed with Ultimate here, Card form is much preferring over the non-card form - The Gallery can take any forms no problem. --iFredCat 04:42, June 18, 2013 (UTC)