| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | ==Welcome== | | ==Welcome== |
| − | Hi and welcome to the ''Yu-Gi-Oh!'' wiki! Thank you for your edit to the '''Special Summon''' page. | + | Hi and welcome to the ''Yu-Gi-Oh!'' wiki! Thank you for your edit to the [[:Special Summon]] page. |
| | | | |
| | If you need help, you can consult these pages: | | If you need help, you can consult these pages: |
| Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| | | | |
| | Alright, then. In the future, please put that type of info in the edit summaries if you remember. Thanks. [[User:Cheesedude|Cheesedude]] ([[User talk:Cheesedude|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cheesedude|contribs]]) 09:11, October 25, 2015 (UTC) | | Alright, then. In the future, please put that type of info in the edit summaries if you remember. Thanks. [[User:Cheesedude|Cheesedude]] ([[User talk:Cheesedude|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cheesedude|contribs]]) 09:11, October 25, 2015 (UTC) |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Will do. Was in a hurry back then and didn't want to change something for the sake of adding a summary.<br />Also, http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Yliaster#Rename_to_Iliaster.3F Considering on the main page, someone already put "(Iliaster in the English dub)," help me find excuses not to edit EVERY instance of Yliaster on this site to Iliaster D: <br />[[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 12:56, October 25, 2015 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Twilight Rose Knight & Wicked Rebirth ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Regarding these cards in the anime, can you actually confirm they were called by their TCG English names in the English dub at least once? If you can, it'd be appreciated if you could respond with the episodes and the points at which they occurred. The Wiki also hasn't settled on a policy of which name takes precedence (for example the TCG EN name was only mentioned once, but the other name was mentioned quite a few times), so if you could hold back on similar renames, but take the time to count their name usages, it'd be appreciated. --[[User:UltimateKuriboh|UltimateKuriboh]] ([[User talk:UltimateKuriboh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UltimateKuriboh|contribs]]) 16:24, December 14, 2015 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :I moved the pages because 1) So that the yugioh.com link actually works and 2) on the actual site, it says http://prntscr.com/9e7d1g and http://prntscr.com/9e7df4. [[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 21:02, December 14, 2015 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::The first reason isn't a valid one, as we have a pre-existing way to fix that. As for the second reason... there should be a minimum of 1 instance of the actual card's name being used in the English dub, before we'll consider using the actual card's name. If that happens to be the case, we're still currently unsure on how to determine which name is used for the anime card page.
| |
| − | ::But in the meantime, the original request still stands; please research their name usages in the dub. --[[User:UltimateKuriboh|UltimateKuriboh]] ([[User talk:UltimateKuriboh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UltimateKuriboh|contribs]]) 01:58, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == "SVFD" ==
| |
| − | It's actually really confusing for now (atleast for me and a few others). Some are saying its "'''''Stab'''''", i thought it was "'''''Stave'''''" initially (but changed it to "'''''Stab'''''", thinking that i was wrong), and some say its "'''''Starve'''''" now. That's why i am leaving it as it is now, and would leave the correction to someone like " [[User:Cheesedude|Cheesedude]]" or wait for the translation of "NeoArkadia" from NAC.--[[User:Supratim1986|Supratim1986]] ([[User talk:Supratim1986|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Supratim1986|contribs]]) 11:47, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Damage Step page ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The only reason I clarified effects can't be activated for stuff like "this card is destroyed by battle and sent to the Graveyard" is because that's all the cited ruling proves. It doesn't prove the case for effects that only care if a monster is just destroyed by battle, like "[[Apprentice Magician]]" or "[[Jurrac Guaiba]]", which contrast with "[[Giant Rat]]". I wish you luck in finding a suitable ruling that proves your assertion for those scenarios. (Idk why I can't find you anymore, it'd make it easier to talk it out.) --23:26, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I was feeling particularly naughty and did some research using some non–Official TCG sources.<br>Regardless, it appears that your assumption on only "sent to the Graveyard" effects is correct (and this [[Forum:D.D._Warrior_Lady_VS_Apprentice_Magician|thread]] needs to be changed) after a simple google search on "[[Apprentice Magician]]" and "[[D.D. Warrior Lady]]". YGOPro also needs to be changed after I saw "[[Supply Squad]]" not activate after "[[D.D. Assailant]]" is banished, but that's my fault for trusting it <_< (or could it be a different interaction?).<br>Even for the ''OCG'', I found this—「戦闘破壊を条件とするが、《ニュードリュア》などと異なり墓地へ送られる必要はなく、《ジュラック・グアイバ》同様フィールド上で発動する効果である。」—on "[[D.D. Assailant|D.D. Assailant's]]" page on [http://yugioh-wiki.net/index.php?cmd=read&page=%A1%D4%A3%C4.%A3%C4.%A5%A2%A5%B5%A5%A4%A5%E9%A5%F3%A5%C8%A1%D5 yugioh-wiki.net], and I ''think'' it says "[[Jurrac Guaiba]]" will activate.[[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 00:20, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Re: "Ikasma Gohatto" ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | That's most likely, since the Italian name I added myself 4 months ago literally translates to "Frozen Fraud". A really silly name if you ask me. --[[User:XBrain130|XBrain130™]]「[[User talk:XBrain130|{{Ruby|Ｘ|エックス}}ブレーン１３０]]」 21:41, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Editing effect properties page ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Please don't do stuff like [[Special:Diff/3571711|this]] unless you intend to go changing the tags. At least make sure it contemplates all instances, like [[Special:Diff/3581485|this]]. Thank you. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Becasita|Becasita]] <sup><small>Pendulum</small></sup></span> <span class="nowrap">([[User talk:Becasita|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Becasita|contribs]])</span> 15:14, November 17, 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hi,i read [[astrograph magician]] trivia page, i think that astrograph magician is not the single union between stargazer magician and timegazer magician. Because if you see cronograph magician imagine you can see that he is the higher form of timegazer as astrogaph is for stargazer.
| |
| − | Astro -> aster -> star
| |
| − | Chrono -> time
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[User:JakeSLG|JakeSLG]] ([[User talk:JakeSLG|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JakeSLG|contribs]]) 16:50, November 18, 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == but why tho ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Please stop vandalizing unofficial TCG translations of OCG cards. They're already in proper PSCT, there's no need to add things like '(Quick Effect)' and use 'GY' instead of Graveyard, unless you know something about some sort of upcoming PSCT change that literally no one else knows about. [[User:Megamaw|Megamaw]] ([[User talk:Megamaw|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Megamaw|contribs]]) 02:00, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :https://www.reddit.com/r/yugioh/comments/6bl05z/new_card_wording_from_the_link_strike_starter_deck/ [[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 02:01, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::first of all what the hell why didn't the org report on this, second of all holy shit my bad. holy shit.[[User:Megamaw|Megamaw]] ([[User talk:Megamaw|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Megamaw|contribs]]) 02:07, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Link Summoning Rulings ==
| |
| − | Hi, if its the case that Link Monsters have to be equal to their Link Numbers why, in example B, is Honeybot treated as a Link 1 monster? I don't understand to be completely honest. Thanks [[User:FatSnorlax|FatSnorlax]] ([[User talk:FatSnorlax|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FatSnorlax|contribs]]) 08:21, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Reply ==
| |
| − | Actually, I will refute the notion that I'm "edit warring", so to speak. In my view, the explanation section got too wordy and long-winded, so I daresay simplifying it was necessary. I will concede the unofficial terminology thing to you since I did check as stringently as I usually do for the terminology this time around, but I've fixed that. In future, I recommend that you actually specify what mistake was made rather than generally saying "unofficial terminology" was used, because that's unspecific and sometimes, people don't check as hard as they should. You are technically correct that there's no "first" or "following" in terms of sending materials, but the intent of those words is to list out the sequence of actions a player must take to Link Summon, being that they must first verbally declare that they are going to Link Summon and choose what monster they are summoning. Then they send the materials. However, I concede that this may be confusing, and I have removed those words. I have already addressed everything else, being that there's no need to specifically indicate the material requirements of one Link Monster (Decode Talker) since that is already mentioned implicitly with the term "requisite Link Materials" in my explanation. We don't specifically say that Number 36 needs Chronomaly Xyz Materials, do we? I don't see a need to also specifically indicate that a Link 3 Monster can be treated as either 1 or 3 Link Materials, and simply indicating that a Link Monster can be optionally treated as either 1 material or a number of materials equal to its Link Number will suffice, in my opinion. Feel free to direct any other concerns my way. ([[User:Lucafriz|Lucafriz]] ([[User talk:Lucafriz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lucafriz|contribs]]) 03:20, June 9, 2017 (UTC))
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Graveyard Rokket Power? ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I just found out about that video for Circuit Break, right? And they went ahead and mentioned Graveyard Dragon Power's alleged synergy with Rokkets. I don't have any problems with that build, or even REDD/BESD. Rokkets are good, but do they really give those two a chance to be better? Like, is this LEGIT?[[User:Surfinbird42|Surfinbird42]] ([[User talk:Surfinbird42|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Surfinbird42|contribs]]) 20:31, October 7, 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :That video is from FANDOM and nobody on this Wikia can do anything about it, regardless of if the information is legitimate. You could take their advice if you like, or you could ignore it. I suggest the latter: Pretend those videos don't exist and downvote all of them. [[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 20:47, October 7, 2017 (UTC)
| |
