Difference between revisions of "Talk:Genex"
(→Commonality?) |
(→Commonality?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
& its kinda cool being on OCG only --[[User:Mdbr2|Mdbr2]] 05:46, April 13, 2010 (UTC) | & its kinda cool being on OCG only --[[User:Mdbr2|Mdbr2]] 05:46, April 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm currently making a genex deck and I have reason to believe that soon they will be well sought out just like machina's because of their good ammount of searching cards and because of synchros. The only syncro I don't have is the fire one otherwise I have them all and just need around 5 more monsters and some spells and traps then I'll be at the tournaments with it | ||
Revision as of 03:37, 3 October 2010
Commonality?
I haven't really seen this decktype thrown around. Is it just me, or is Genex an under-used decktype? --Kalseng 12:10, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
It's currently an OCG only archtype. Falzar FZ 12:16, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
& its kinda cool being on OCG only --Mdbr2 05:46, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
I'm currently making a genex deck and I have reason to believe that soon they will be well sought out just like machina's because of their good ammount of searching cards and because of synchros. The only syncro I don't have is the fire one otherwise I have them all and just need around 5 more monsters and some spells and traps then I'll be at the tournaments with it
