Difference between revisions of "Talk:Points to"
(→Is this page really necessary?) |
(→Is this page really necessary?) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::If we end up just renaming, I would suggest "Pointed zone", just to be more specific, and consistent with the previous name. --[[User:XBrain130|XBrain130™]]「[[User talk:XBrain130|{{Ruby|X|エックス}}ブレーン130]]」 08:41, June 13, 2017 (UTC) | ::If we end up just renaming, I would suggest "Pointed zone", just to be more specific, and consistent with the previous name. --[[User:XBrain130|XBrain130™]]「[[User talk:XBrain130|{{Ruby|X|エックス}}ブレーン130]]」 08:41, June 13, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Pointed zone isn't an official term though. I'd rather avoid that. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:08, June 13, 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:08, 13 June 2017
Is this page really necessary?
It seems to be just an extension of Link Arrows, similar to "co-linked" is to "linked." It is simply whatever those arrows are pointing at.
TCG never even gave it a proper term name, and refers to it only as "points to." It is unlikely that it'll give it one at all, and I don't want this page to be the unofficial "Link Point" forever.
I suggest merging with the Link Arrows page. Lightning Laxus (talk • contribs) 05:50, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose we could move this page to "point" and make it about the meaning of the term "point" in the context of Link Monsters. --SnorlaxMonster 07:46, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
- If we end up just renaming, I would suggest "Pointed zone", just to be more specific, and consistent with the previous name. --XBrain130™「
X ブレーン130」 08:41, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
- If we end up just renaming, I would suggest "Pointed zone", just to be more specific, and consistent with the previous name. --XBrain130™「