Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unicorn"
(Created page with 'This "archetype" is pretty good with only Unicorn Familiar having a different pronounced name than the others.~~~~') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This "archetype" is pretty good with only Unicorn Familiar having a different pronounced name than the others.[[User:Zeromaro|Zeromaro]] 04:16, April 1, 2010 (UTC) | This "archetype" is pretty good with only Unicorn Familiar having a different pronounced name than the others.[[User:Zeromaro|Zeromaro]] 04:16, April 1, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could we please delete this "archetype"? It has no support cards, none of the monsters have similar effects and as pointed out, one of monsters is even written differently in japanese. Just because they all have similar names it doesn't make them an archetype, this article is about as pointless as the [[Warriors]] article. [[Special:Contributions/91.85.128.185|91.85.128.185]] 13:04, May 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:04, 7 May 2010
This "archetype" is pretty good with only Unicorn Familiar having a different pronounced name than the others.Zeromaro 04:16, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Could we please delete this "archetype"? It has no support cards, none of the monsters have similar effects and as pointed out, one of monsters is even written differently in japanese. Just because they all have similar names it doesn't make them an archetype, this article is about as pointless as the Warriors article. 91.85.128.185 13:04, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
