|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Talkheader}}
| + | == Summary == |
| − | | + | Importing file |
| − | == Broader template == | |
| − | Hey Delt, did you look at all at the possibility of creating a True Duel Monsters card template that would cover DOR and FMR? I don't actually know how similar these games are (having played it, I'm decently familiar with DOR, but I've never even seen FMR gameplay), but the Japanese names suggest they're a series, which just by itself implies a lot of shared features. <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千？！</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 10:36, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :I think the games are too different. ''DOR'' as you probably know, is played on a board, which the cards can move around, while ''FMR'' is a watered-down version of the ''TCG''.
| |
| − | :* ''FMR'' has no Effect Monsters.
| |
| − | :* ''FMR'' has no Deck Costs.
| |
| − | :* ''FMR'' has Guardian Stars.
| |
| − | :* Many cards have different effects. Of course effects referring to moving around the board make no sense the context of ''FMR''.
| |
| − | :* The way they divide and colour Spell and Trap Cards (Magic, Power Up, Ritual and Trap) is the same, but some cards have different types between games, e.g. "[[Cursebreaker]]" and "[[Magical Labyrinth]]".
| |
| − | :* The Ritual Cards work the same, but I think the material is sometimes different or less strict in ''DOR''.
| |
| − | :* ''FMR'' doesn't have Attributes. Although that's subjective. The icons are removed, but their background colour remains. No cards refer to Attributes, but seem to affect them anyway. e.g. "[[Salamandra]]" affects all would-be-FIRE monsters.
| |
| − | :Despite being in the same series as ''DOR'', I'd say ''FMR'' is more like the early ''Duel Monsters'' video games in terms of gameplay. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 20:02, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::OK, that's persuasive enough for me. =) <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千？！</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 00:58, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Image names ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | So, poking through some of our DOR images, it appears that there are three basic types of image we might have for any given card:
| |
| − | * the "info pane" image used for most of the examples here, e.g. [[:File:BlueEyesWhiteDragon-DOR-EN-VG.png]]
| |
| − | * an actual "card-style" image, e.g. [[:File:CocoonofEvolution-DOR-EN-VG.jpg]]
| |
| − | * a non-card image, e.g. [[:File:KingTigerWanghu-DOR-EN-VG-NC.jpg]]
| |
| − | (there's also [[:File:ContractofMask-DOR-EN-VG.jpg|whatever this is]], though that could just be an NC image with a weird crop/angle or something)
| |
| − | | |
| − | The non-card images are already covered in terms of naming, but not the other two: depending where you look, either one might have the "base" image designation or the "-2" tag, and I'm sure there are cases where something else was done; I haven't looked through terribly many images. So, I have to ask which we want as the "base" image, and what to do for the other type of image, assuming we even want both images (do we?). Thoughts? <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千？！</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 01:20, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :I think for all mediums which have cards, we should put the card image in the standard file name. Although that would mean renaming over 5000 ''Tag Force'' images. For the filename for the other ''DOR'' images, we could use something like '''-data''' or '''-info'''. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 02:17, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Actually some form of '''Basic Info''' would be most appropriate. When you view a card, you get a list of options, "Basic Info", "Special Info", "Power-up Card" and "Leader Ability". "Basic Info" is the shot used in images. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 03:35, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::Could you give a line-up of examples of each type? <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千？！</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 03:40, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Applicable power-ups ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | As mentioned in the above section, when you view a monster, you get the option to see a list of applicable Power-up Cards. Should we add a section for this? We could muse on the possibility of somehow handling this automatically. At the moment, I'm just wondering how we could present this information? A collapsible table cell? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 03:42, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :<code>.hlist .hcomma</code>, maybe? <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千？！</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 14:06, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
| |
