Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Gameplay"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Basic, intermediate, advanced and expert: new section)
(Basic, intermediate, advanced and expert: comment)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
* Very basic things like [[Type]], [[Attribute]] and [[victory condition]], i.e. how a game ends, are classed as expert.
 
* Very basic things like [[Type]], [[Attribute]] and [[victory condition]], i.e. how a game ends, are classed as expert.
 
There's a lot of other stuff which seems out of place. Should we just drop the column that divides them into "basic", "intermediate", "advanced" and "expert" or does someone want to chance a better arangement? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 18:17, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 
There's a lot of other stuff which seems out of place. Should we just drop the column that divides them into "basic", "intermediate", "advanced" and "expert" or does someone want to chance a better arangement? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 18:17, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I've also always been bugged by this. I have a feeling the categorization originally came from some official source or another, though if so, I rather doubt it actually divided the game mechanics so thoroughly. Personally, I'd rather see the categorization gone and the template reorganized some; I think trying to maintain the distinction while making it less arbitrary as to what goes where is too much effort for too little gain. <span class="nowrap">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#00f;">ディノ</span><span style="color:#080;">奴</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color:#F90;">千?!</span>]]」<sup>[[wikipedia:Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 20:36, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:36, 10 February 2013

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Template:Gameplay.

Please try to

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Be welcoming

Maybe I'm not looking in the right place, but I don't think I see a link for card setup, such as where monster cards and traps/spells are located. Is there no page on that? Lying 06:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Look under the "Playing Field Zones" section. --Bluedog (Talk) 06:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Card types

Feel free to fill in any gaps in the table. ダイノガイ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:27, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

  Normal Continuous Field Equip Quick-Play Ritual Counter
Spell Normal Spell Card Continuous Spell Card Field Spell Card Equip Spell Card Quick-Play Spell Card Ritual Spell Card
Trap Normal Trap Card Continuous Trap Card Field Trap Card Equip Trap Card Counter Trap Card
Trap-Spell Normal Trap-Spell Card Continuous Trap-Spell Card
Equip Equip Card
Virus Field Virus Card

Reorganization

Flip should not listed underneath Normal (which is underneath "Summoning mechanics", which is underneath "Intermediate"). It deserves a category of its own, since it doesn't count as a Normal Summon or Set. I don't want to mess around with the template personally. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 08:16, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Basic, intermediate, advanced and expert

The categorisation into "basic", "intermediate", "advanced" and "expert" seems arbitrary and even nonsensical in places.

There's a lot of other stuff which seems out of place. Should we just drop the column that divides them into "basic", "intermediate", "advanced" and "expert" or does someone want to chance a better arangement? -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:17, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

I've also always been bugged by this. I have a feeling the categorization originally came from some official source or another, though if so, I rather doubt it actually divided the game mechanics so thoroughly. Personally, I'd rather see the categorization gone and the template reorganized some; I think trying to maintain the distinction while making it less arbitrary as to what goes where is too much effort for too little gain. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 20:36, February 10, 2013 (UTC)