Talk:T.G.

From Yugipedia
Revision as of 07:11, 29 March 2024 by 220.233.199.77 (talk) (Monster pairings: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Deletion[edit]

I think that this yet another page that should be deleted, seeing that it just talks about "Majestic Star Dragon", but nothing about the "Tech Genus" archetype whatsoever. --Psychid45, a.k.a. Psychid; real pen name, no gimmicks! 17:02, September 3, 2009 (UTC)


Possibility for Next Set[edit]

The information from Starstrike Blast mentions a new monster series will be introduced. Tech Genus could be that new series--71.80.67.80 15:21, April 9, 2010 (UTC).

Something is wrong with "Tech Genus" Archtype[edit]

How come I can't add "TGX3-DX2", "TG-SX1", and "TG1-EM1" in it's support archetype.--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 22
22, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Patience. It takes a while for the boxes to update. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 22:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
It's not suppose to take that long;.--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 02
42, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
Finally it's there. Everytime I try it never shows up.--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 03
31, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

New top tier deck?[edit]

After seeing yusei vs antinomy, i am quite sure this will be a top tier deck. Just a prediction.

I think all the "Tech Genus" cards will be relased in OCG/TCG.--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 14
05, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE: New Top Tier Deck[edit]

I agree. the have excellent potential with synchros and field advantage, not to mention anti-meta, with card negating effects. For example, Tech Genus Blade Blaster and Tech Genus Halberd Cannon. (75.71.136.197 (talk) 23:11, February 3, 2011 (UTC)) ORIGINAL TECH_GENUS

What's in the page[edit]

...needs to be fixed. Bottom part talks about Bruno and his chant, which is more suitable to be on his page, rather than on the TG page. There's also a part of the page that talks about Yusei and his Synchros, which is completely unrelated to TG. I would have fixed the page myself if I know how to reword the article so that it is better....Order (talkcontribs) 11:20, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Uncertain if should be on page, - stuff added by glow-up bulb- please discuss if yes/no[edit]

— This unsigned comment was made by Resk (talkcontribs) 13:03, 2011 April 17

I'd say revert pretty much all of it. It's just badly formatted, and overkilled with images and also overkilled with other useless stuff.
Maybe back to Revision as of 07:37, 2011 April 9 by 210.24.205.224
To remove the clutter (overkill of images, incorrect template parameters, and repeat of Bruno#Decks) -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:10, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
April 9th seems fine, though I think maybe keep the anime section, and maybe, 1 picture for it?-Resk (Talk) 13:29, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Isn't the anime section a repeat of Bruno#Decks? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:30, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, i suppose it is, Though,,, Oh, never mind, for some reason I thought other pages had 'anime' sections, but E-Hero's don't, thus it's fine to kill off that bit too, April 9th seems good,-Resk (Talk) 13:34, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

I was wondering, what makes T.G. Jet Falcon used over T.G. Catapult Dragon in the Junk Tengu Doppel engine? And how come Spore was never used? I added it considering the new list, but if I was out of place, feel free to revert (and sorry). Also, I would recommend Limit Reverse, but I wanted other people to agree before I added it. TechGenusMaster (talkcontribs) 16:03, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Monster pairings[edit]

Is it worth documenting the way that the original T.G. Main Deck monsters were designed to be used in specific pairs (Warwolf + Striker, Catapult Dragon + Jet Falcon, Cyber Magician + Rush Rhino)? 220.233.199.77 (talk) 07:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)