Difference between revisions of "User talk:Biennale"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
:Okay sorry about that. Shall pay more attention in future and won't touch those pages... --<span style="color:#00F; font-family: Garamond; font-size: 9pt">[[User:Sardeth42|''slave'']]<small>([[User talk:Sardeth42|command]])</small></span> 21:47, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
:Okay sorry about that. Shall pay more attention in future and won't touch those pages... --<span style="color:#00F; font-family: Garamond; font-size: 9pt">[[User:Sardeth42|''slave'']]<small>([[User talk:Sardeth42|command]])</small></span> 21:47, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
==No==
 +
 +
Unfortunately, I do not. *sigh* fine, i guess I'll back down for now...[[User:Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers|Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers]] ([[User talk:Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers|contribs]]) 01:15, September 30, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:15, 30 September 2013

I still look at these from time to time

Talk

Please, problems questions, anything I'll address whatever it is ASAP :)

Archiving

Did you clear out your Talk Page because you didn't want them on your Talk Page anymore? If so, would you want a way to view previous messages your Talk Page for posterity's sake (without checking your History of this page)? --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 05:54, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

In short yes; I wouldn't mind it being made, but is it alright if I just clear things this way? - I intended to leave some messages if I thought the were going to be important enough but yeah I wouldn't mind archive page being made if that's what's preferred --slave(command) 06:02, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

Replay

Well as you argue on the Number article in regards to the number of Numbers in a characters posestion it is speculation. Photonkrios99 (talkcontribs) 06:19, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

If this is about 104 and C104, then yes probably, I wasn't the one that originally put it there, I didn't touch that bit because I was not sure whether that ahd been proved in the latest episode which I ahd not yet seen --slave(command) 06:26, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

Set IDs

I'm going to have to ask you to leave the Set IDs alone for awhile. Apparently, you don't know whether or not certain edits qualify as un-supported, or are actually valid with a source of info. You did this for Duelist Pack: Yuma 2: Gogogo & Dododo, where a random user starting inserting card names to create a full list (with no source of info stated), indirectly supporting that user's edits. Not only that, but you also did this for the English list of Shadow Specters, even when the English names were only fan-translations, and not actually official TCG names. This is a warning. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 14:33, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Okay sorry about that. Shall pay more attention in future and won't touch those pages... --slave(command) 21:47, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

No

Unfortunately, I do not. *sigh* fine, i guess I'll back down for now...Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers (talkcontribs) 01:15, September 30, 2013 (UTC)