User talk:Cheesedude

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave any messages below. However, do not ask me for help with your Deck. I have not actively played the TCG in a very long time, and have not kept up with current rulings. If you leave me a message, I will put your talk page on my watchlist. You may respond on my talk page or your talk page. I will check both.

Number 69

I am debating through through the effort of undoing the rename to Number 69 due to the fact the person that went through with making it Coat of Arms did not provide any actual proof that it is supposed to be Coat of Arms. Is it worth going through, or just leave the possibly mistaken name up until we get something else to prove it once and for all beyond the image I linked on the talk page. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 02:10, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Since posting this notice about the potential need to reverse a rename, Number 69 has been renamed for a second time, once again to something that is not backed by what is shown in: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aakK6uiWqKY/UYLR2tEphRI/AAAAAAAABaA/uEcovDftjqU/s1600/39acd5dbfa3fe7987f6d576700ff413c.jpg As I can not rename the page back to Heraldic Emblem as supported by the link, I have to leave this up to an admin to settle since this appears to be ready to turn into an edit war. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 03:34, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Until we have an actual source that says the English name (which should come fairly soon), I'm inclined to leave it as it is. My time is short on the weekends and I must go soon, and I don't want to spend the little time I have on the wiki today moving that article again. If you wish to contact another admin instead, that would be fine as well. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

I thought to bring it up because the previous edits were without any source at all and the provided link does suggest that the name is Heraldic Emblem. Along with Number 8's name and the rest of the archetype being Heraldic Beast also implying that the name should be Heraldic at the very least. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 17:50, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I'm back for the day. Seems its been moved again. A source was provided this time, but the link is dead. I'm looking into now and trying to find a source somewhere. As for your other comment, check the card's talk page, I've answered that part there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:27, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

I just took a look to the source posted, which just happened to be Shriek listing the card in the English spoiler without an image of the card. I've been hesitant to use that as a source for renames on the Dragon Rulers because they either could just be pulling names out, or taking them from the wikia as I have seen them called out for doing before. For the time being I put the rename template up on the page in the off chance that the name doesnt change from its Spanish > English translation and left it at that. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:37, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not a fan of Shriek myself. The rename template should be fine for now. If it gets moved again without a source, I'm locking it down. Anyway, thank you for doing what you've done. You went about this right way for sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:41, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

It beat the throwdowns I had over Hope Ray V/Victory. Also helps that this is a case where I feel like I'm in the right and can back up why I am for that matter. Either way, I'm already out of the options that I could through on my own so it has to be up to the staff at this point to put an end to the rename battle going on. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:52, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Number 69

Here's the link to Number 69's TCG confirmed name: clicky --Yes, it's PSYCHID! ^{He talks! He does stuff!} 22:06, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

That really isnt a source. For all we know, Shriek took the name from the wikia and they do not actually know. This is why I have put the rename template in place on Number 69's page so that it can be handled by staff - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 22:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Also to address the issue of using Shriek as a source, they also have the little Dragon Ruler's named in that spoiler for the TCG set. Yet no one here has renamed those respective pages because they doubt the authenticity of the translations/localizations for their names. They may be accurate at reporting events, but they are not very good at translating anything for themselves. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 19:25, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Confused IP-Addressed User

It sound like he was not Master D, but I have nothing to against with that. So feel free to extending the situation to him of why he was blocking. And yes, I know that he can playing a trick, making himself as if he was another person. If you don't like how he act, lock the edits on him further to prevent him from making himself a joker. --iFredCat 13:44, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

My Wikia App

Hello. My name is Nic and I'm from the Community Development Team. As you may or may not have heard, we recently released an application called My Wikia. We are hoping to bring this app to the attention of more people and for this reason could use some cooperation with this Wiki. We are hoping that you will allow us to display this Template in the upper-right hand column on your wiki. If you are fine with us displaying this, please let me know. Thanks. - Wagnike2 (talk • contribs) 14:10, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

I've mentioned it to some other admins. I'll let you know as soon as I can. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

It seems fine. Feel free to put it up. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:05, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Overlay Network

You should take a look at Overlay Network article. It explains the portal which Vetrix and Barian race use to teleport. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 00:33, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

If you look at Overlay Network close and what it for. You can impale that it is portal used to travel through dimensions such as Xyz Monsters used it to come to earth. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 01:39, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

From my observation, I think they do resemble to Xyz summoning. As you go inside the Overlay Network portal, it look like The card frame of Xyz Monsters which stylized by having it appear as if one is flying through space with many stars in the frame giving the appearance of one streaking by them and other stars appearing stationary due to relative distance. Similar to the Photo where Vector is travel through dimensions. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:01, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

I guess so. We should wait for few more episodes because they might explain more about portals used by the Barians and Different Dimension Airship. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:07, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

Vandal

I take it you handled the precautions regarding our latest vandal, right?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 18:46, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

(Transferred by iFredCat 19:42, May 11, 2013 (UTC))

Yeah, he's blocked. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:45, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry to be a bother. I was afraid I posted this conversation under the wrong cathegory. If so, I appologize.--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 21:09, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

No worry - you just posted it in wrong article after all, lucky that I was really nice to help you out by place your comment in here instead. Just like your Talk Page, be sure to be careful when you're going to post in the comment. And if you're using Monobook skin, it will be known as "Discussion" next to the "User Page", like I am using right now. --iFredCat 22:29, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Aye, I sure messed up that. Gomen. --Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 22:32, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Battle Ox

So, any more comments on Talk:Battle Ox (character)? I got no more reply. :/ LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

I've been busy, sorry. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:13, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Nah, don't worry. Thanks for replying. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:42, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Dexter 98 reference

Can you fix this? I've been trying but I don't know why it's still not displaying (I've been in the preview 5 times over trying to figure out what's up). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:49, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Dexter's Laboratory or Dexter from Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's? --iFredCat 22:51, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Where am I supposed to be looking, Shard? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:01, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Here. For some reason the episode 98 reference won't display, and if I try to remove it, the next reference is affected the same way. (edit) 'face-palm that I didn't see that'. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:14, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Number 74

I'm pretty sure you've had it with this by now, but may I hear your reasons for it once again?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:10, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

He means the trivia talk page of Number 74. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Accidental rv

Sorry for the recent revert, accidently hit Rollback when I was actually only trying to click diff. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

No big deal (I do that at least once a month myself). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:52, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

GX is part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season!

I swore to Sophia, that user is one stubborn user, he just kept revert his own edit back to what he believed. I had to revert it back to the way you thought it was right. Wouldn't it's time to lock up the article for a day or two, OR go ahead and slap some sense in that IP-Addressed User? --iFredCat 01:23, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No, because he offered a perfectly reasonable explanation for the revert. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:26, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Well, though they are using the same structure (Yu-Gi-Oh! cards and game ideas), they are still separate show. I am aware that Yugi made his appearance more than his rival (Seto) but that's not enough to making GX become part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season. I would say same for 5D's and ZEXAL, though Dark Magician Girl, statue monsters, etc. are all common appearance through all shows. I would be damned if he put in some more logical thought of why GX is same as Second Season, they are stay separate. --iFredCat 01:29, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

I never said they were the same show (nor did the IP), I said the IP's reasons were valid because the articles are structured like that. If you care that much, I suggest you go fix them in the all the other articles, then revert the IP's edit. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:33, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

He didn't "undoing" my edit as of lately. And that article is only one he vandalism'd on. --iFredCat 01:35, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Fred. Go read his last edit summary. Then read my last post again. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:47, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, my dear coffee guy, if you still disagreed, just go and revert it - I usually left all edits from my friends (yes, included you) alone. --iFredCat 03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure you're understanding me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

*poking your shoulder* --iFredCat 03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Addition to the Index Page

Would it be alright if you added Forum:Weekly Deck Competition to the list of blue links on the Forum:Index page? All the other forums have a link that lets users go to the forum they need, but the WDC Forum doesn't, I think it might be a way to advertise the contest to new users. Just a thought. Also, Cheesedude, if you're not the person to ask, who should I ask? --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 02:59, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I'll add it now. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:01, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 03:03, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Let me know if the text I used for the pipe needs to be changed. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No, I like the text. But, could you add in to before show off? That way it makes sense with the first part of the question proposed, Do you want.... --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that might help. Done. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Images

Hey Cheesedude. Jx900 has uploaded many fan-made images which are really of no benefit to the wiki. I'm speaking to him in the chatroom now and it is all in good faith; it isn't 'vandalism' as such. The images are of cards, but are fan-made versions. 'Mind having a look?. Thanks, --Spongebob456 ^Talk 18:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Yea, anime pictures, Bob456... He would have a serious stack cut off his job. If he still don't listen, a week of ban would deal with him. --iFredCat 19:14, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, he's stopped uploading them after I told him the issue. It's all out of good faith; a block isn't necessary. --Spongebob456 ^Talk 19:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, it must hit him like a truck would stopping on the dime. --iFredCat 19:58, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Ruling Vandalism?

*thumbed over the shoulder, at GrouchMan's Profile* Ain't that forbidden to have artwork of Characters in the User's Page? --iFredCat 21:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

It is? I wasn't aware of thet. Why is it forbidden?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:03, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Copyright violation. Fair use covers the article space, not the user space. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

RE:User page

Oh sure, Cheesedude, sorry about that. -- GrouchMan (My trash can) 22:48, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Artwork page guidelines

Right, I'm shocked this is even an issue, but some people seem to think that cards have genders, so it has become one. I have two points.

• It made perfect sense to begin changing cards from, for example, "The artwork of "Foolish Burial" was edited to... [description of change]" to "This card's artwork was edited to... [description of change]" because the name of the card is obvious. The card name is listed on the page already, why do we need to repeat ourselves? This is something Fred doesn't seem to understand, and although it's logical, a lot of users still use the former way.
• The use of "her" to describe cards. Cards do not have genders. The monsters depicted in the artwork have genders, but in artwork pages, we are referring to the artwork itself, not the monster. I'm not completely against using "her", because it can be awkward to describe artwork changes otherwise, and because it's such a tiny thing blown out of proportion by one disillusioned user, but a more professional sounding alternative would be preferable.

My point is, can we have a draft of Artwork guidelines now that we've finally finished dealing with Trivia guidelines, with a sample of how the card artwork pages should be worded?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Along with Joey's own comment, I would like to suggest you to read all lines that other articles had before this issue was hit the fan and shattered all over here now. I meant, why bother deal the theory on Elfobia if there are already many other girls' articles had those lines in that way? --iFredCat 19:10, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that is exactly the current standard that I feel should be reviewed.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:15, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, we should probably make an artwork policy page. I can try to make a draft tonight. As for the issue at hand, UK suggested using "this monster instead of "this card". That should satisfy both parties. The wording is a problem though. You're right that its like that on all the pages and it shouldn't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:27, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Voice actors

I'm just curious, where do you guys get your information on who voices who in the English dub? ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:40, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

I assume its from episode credits, but I'm not actually sure. I haven't dealt with any voice actor edits. I would ask Golden Key. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:45, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, anyway. I'll go ahead and ask him. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:46, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Convert Ghost

In the anime does the text actually say it is re-set like the Games? If so then I can add in 78 in Mistake section that Lester did not mention it was re-set. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:43, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

The transcribed Japanese anime lore in the article does mention that. Whether that text is the same as the text in the card image I can't be sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:46, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Sebek's Blessing

I'm not sure how to edit the card templates so I'll leave you a message and ask if you could do this for me. The mentioned card has an altered effect in the anime, where it works with any battle damage inflicted, not just direct attacks. It is used in this manner in three episodes so it isn't just a one-time error either. Drake Clawfang (talk • contribs) 09:55, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Added. In this case, an "animelore" parameter just needed to be added with the right text. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:38, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Merag and Nasch Identities

In the History Page of Seven Barian Emperors, you said this: "Can't wait for people to start adding pictures of Shark and Rio to the human form columns for Nasch and Merag though."

I can't help but wonder what with Tenjo = Merag while Kamashiro = Nasch ?!? 141.0.9.59 (talk) 14:08, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not seeing any implications that Kite is Merag. If you look at the Numbers map that Heartland shows, two of the ruins are at the bottom of the ocean. They have to be Nasch's and Merag's. Nasch looks like Shark. Shark can use Chaos Numbers for no known reason and Rio can sense Barians. So I'm pretty sure Shark is Nasch and Merag is Rio. That said, its not confirmed, so it shouldn't be added to the article until it is, which is why I said I couldn't wait for people to start adding it - it shouldn't be added yet, so it would need be reverted. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:31, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Following Cheesy's comment, you need a source to prove that Shark and Rio are them and you need an frame to show them transformed. Otherwise, you are just a foolish storyteller. --iFredCat 16:41, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Hey guys, i was wanting to talk about Nasch and Merag's identities as well. i was like looking at the page wondering why have people already put up the pictures of shark and rio when nothing has really revealed if the two were really nasch and merag. yeah true shark looks like nasch but that isn't confirmed, so we should delete their pics until next week's episode when we know exactly what is going on. but i jut can't help wondering what if my favorite Shark and Rio are really Barians, if so they should just side with Yuma and continue to help them. oh another thing what i find interesting was that, the Kastle twins are like the opposites of the rest of the Barian Emperors; how the Kastle twins don't remember their past lives as Barians and the 7 Emperors don't remember their past lives as humans. well, we'll see about next week. Rubi1998 (talk • contribs) 13:04, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Its not confirmed that they are Nasch and Merag. However, it IS confirmed that both Shark and Rio had past lives. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:10, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

However, Past Shark was showing to wielding Barian symbol on his chest and they are in the royal family (Shark being prince and Rio being princess). Therefore, Emperor can't be King/Queen unless they have royal blood, like them. --iFredCat 17:15, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

They don't all have to have been rulers in their past lives. Mizael was just a dragon tamer and Durbe was a knight. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:17, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Yea, that's an idea. Emperors are just little lower than King/Queen, to be honest. Treat them like chess pieces. --iFredCat 17:19, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Chaos End Ruler

He believed that since "Chaos End Ruler -Ruler of the Beginning and the End-" was following other "Envoy" monsters in the effect and summon condition therefore he thought that would be a-okay to renaming the broken card into "Envoy of the Beginning and the End" instead. But I agreed with you about the name thingy - it should stay in that way anyways. --iFredCat 16:39, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

ZEXAL episode 107 summary

Sorry for asking, but would you mind expanding the summary of Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 107? It feels...kind of bare. I'm asking this because I've seen how well you've written out the summaries of past ZEXAL eps. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 07:17, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Its on my list, yeah. Doing the summaries the way I've done in the past is very time-intensive. I try to do some when I feel I take it, but it can take up to three hours, all told (sort of burned myself out doing the entirety of the WDC finals arc). I plan to go back and do 101 before anything else. I don't mind the bare summaries, what I do mind is the image spam. You can't have all those images if there's not enough text to support them. Also, I use bobo from NAC's scripts as a base to write them, so I can't start on 107 until that gets posted. And don't apologize for asking, its nice to know which episodes people are most interested in seeing expanded. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:59, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

A'ight, that's good to know; thanks. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 16:59, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Ride 30

Nope, it doesn't appear. Gonna remove it. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 15:46, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comment

Hello, Cheesedude. You have new messages at FredCat100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--iFredCat 20:55, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Question

Can this be considered spam? He's made several posts like that, and even though we tell him we have no affiliation to Konami, he still posts them up. Plus there's stuff like this. Just wondering. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 18:41, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, its spam. I'm gonna delete both threads and leave him a message. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:46, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

31.11.101.253

Whoa, calm down - he did made a good suggest for some card's names. And some of them are making sense; like "Purple" was such to be in the place before the Dragon but after the name, like "Pyrallis, the Blazing Purple Dragon" instead of "Purple Dragon FlameThrower". I respect him for that reason. So if you still disagreed, may you explain what's on your thought of him being a "bastard" for all those renaming? --iFredCat 19:57, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Its Master D. He should be banned on-sight for ban evasion, if nothing else. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:06, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

It's not ban evasion, lol :) - that account's ban ran out, and I had every right to start using it. 109.163.239.214 (talk) 23:08, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Well, congratulation, you had failed to prevent him from moved "Divine Dragoon Knight Felgrand" into "Felgrand the Divine Dragon Knight". That was also provided by Master D (109.163.239.214). --iFredCat 23:10, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

No, you don't. You're ban evading. Your original account is infinitely banned. Any all edits from you are ban evasion, period. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:11, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Well, there is no harm in that. The original ban was for invalid reasons, and besides, it's not like I'm vandalizing stuff. You people take things way too seriously. 109.163.239.214 (talk) 23:13, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, your "Master D" account is locked and I only can "view source" on it, not edit it. You're still ban even to-day. --iFredCat 23:18, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

New hardhead

Oh dear, 222.124.130.204 (AKA Master D) has escaped other banlist, and is heavily reverting "Ancient Fairy Dragon" article all because of "Ancient" being adjective instead of noun. Care to block him, or if you don't think so; protecting that article further to preventing IP-Addressed Users to be able to editing it? --iFredCat 02:41, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you already agreed that Jewel Flare Dragon Stardust (or Stardust Radiance Dragon at the time) was not the same thing as "Radiance Dragon - Stardust" months ago. Therefore, you cannot just change this one. Ancient Fairy Dragon and Fairy Dragon - Ancient are not the same thing. You could also use Ancient, the Fairy Dragon if you'd like, but that is still not the same thing as Ancient Fairy Dragon. 85.135.52.30 (talk) 02:45, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Mewback MKFWEF

Hello, Cheesedude. You have new messages at FredCat100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 03:25, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

5ds 150

Next time could you put your thoughts on the talk page before you make the change? While I agree things like that are expected in an anime, that doesn't mean it's still not a mistake (a human being cannot just breath in space). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:30, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Reasons?

I believed that he thought it's better to call him "Shark" rather than full name and it was not Rio who dueled Shark at all, it was Abyss, but yes - they still have to be naming there anyways. --iFredCat 01:44, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

Reply

Here is the proof, the user inserted the link. The Numbers have been named differently because of it. Energy X ∞ 19:48, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Fonda

SALUTATIONS, CHEESEDUDE!! (It's actually me, ArcadiasScholarly, albeit in hurry hurry rush rush IP mode!! ;j)

When I attempted to make a separate page for Fonda's Decks and save the moved Deck specs, I got an "error" saying that the page already exists. I then put "Fonda Fontaine's Decks" (the intended page title) in the search box and when I found the said link and clicked, I noticed it took me to Fonda's page, yet automatically scrolled me down to her Deck specs.

That's when it hit me--I remember trying to do this before (i.e. also with Jasmine, Mindy, Tania, etc.) but Aged Goblin not only reverted everything but also rather than at least DELETING the pages, he must of somehow done something that links the "pages" I made right to the character's Deck sections ON THE CHARACTER'S PAGES INSTEAD OF DELETING THEM. So in other words, since those "pages" I made re-direct to those said areas in reality BUT ALSO since they still technically exist on the Wiki, I can't create a new page with those "sensible" titles (i.e Jasmine's Decks, which sounds aesthetically in-sync with Yuma Tsukumo's Decks.)

You can either reply to me via my IP address or mah registered username (although if this "new policy" that'll axe unregistereds will make them non-existent here, methinks you should best reply to the latter.) I simply ask if this can be fixed (as in, can these "nonsensical section re-directs" be made into distinctive pages again??) You kinda get where Imma coming from here? =? --68.82.237.254 (talk) 20:14, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

KC - Kaiba's Corp

Well, I thought KaibaCorp always invents Dueling products like the Duel Disks, the Duel Runners and the Duel things in the first season

Larry1996 (talk • contribs) 21:49, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Not all Kaibacrop can do - Yusei made two motorcycles and 3 (viewed) Duel Disks from scratches. And he's not an employee of KC yet. If he can do that, then anyone in Yu-Gi-Oh! universe can do the same; even Astral/Number 96 as well. --iFredCat 22:12, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, KaibaCorp did make Duel Disks. I don't know that they ever revealed where mass-produced Duel Runners came from though. It's not that what you wrote isn't true, its that what you wrote isn't adding anything to the article. There's been no mention of who makes D-Pads and D-Gazers. We don't need to mention that has been no mention.

Fred, I'd like to request you don't respond to things on my talk page unless you have an actual answer. I don't mind someone else answering for me, but that's not what you've been doing either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:54, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Aii, Cheesy. At least I saved you a trouble of cracking an article into two... --iFredCat 00:06, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Goblin's gone done it again!!

SALUTATIONS ONCE AGAIN, CHEESEDUDE!!

Goblin's gone done it again--doing Deck re-directs for Roman Goodwin, Devack, Chumley Huffington, Sarina and Pierre the Gambler. (JUST gots done un-doin them!) Could u please try 2 talk to him about what's been "agreed" on regarding the larger characters' Deck sections? --68.82.237.254 (talk) 14:35, June 30, 2013 (UTC)