User talk:Constellar28

Welcome

Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the User talk:Constellar28 page.

If you need help, you can consult these pages:

• Help:Contents
• Manual of style
• Chat policy

If you would like to make a suggestion or ask for assistance, feel free start a topic at the forums or contact an administrator.

IM AWESOME Constellar28 (talk • contribs) 21:14, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

IM AWESOMER Constellar28 (talk • contribs) 21:15, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Duston News

Hey, thanks for the news! We have a tournament coming up this weekend which I may use Dustons in. Don't know if you want to enter. And yep, will keep you updated! :) --Spongebob456 ^talk 18:58, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

Favorite cards

"The Tripper Mercury" is my favorite. I hope it gets released someday, maybe as an Insect. :) --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 19:37, October 12, 2014 (UTC)

I suppose Thor would be my favorite. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 15:07, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

chat

sorry i wasn't talking on the chat--Legacyhunters (talk • contribs) 00:28, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

hi

I am unsure if you chatted with me I doubt it i wanted to say sorry for not talking --Legacyhunters (talk • contribs) 17:41, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

my fav dragon reply

my fav dragon in power is the mythic dragon but for a regular dragon it has to be blue eyes but if anything i prefer cyber dragons as I love zane--Legacyhunters (talk • contribs) 06:05, December 21, 2014 (UTC)

The Shaddoll and Infernoids

Stop reverting them. the level 6 infernoid HAS been revealed. http://ygorganization.com/ocg-vjump-time/ Infernoid Belphegor it is NOT false info. Further the admins have left a comment on the Shaddoll Page. Nephlim HAS NO COUNTERPART and any attempts to add one into that field WILL be reverted FAST. See teh History page, MANY people have tried adding that. Til a card art shows it, it isn't happening.DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 23:53, January 18, 2015 (UTC)

go to shaddoll page and use the edit source option, when you do you will notice the admins have added the following message in a way that will not show up in the main article

"Are you editing this to add "Gem-Knight Lady Lapislazuli" as the counterpart? Don't. It WILL be reverted" they need to disable Visual editor for that page so people will actually see it. Take it up with the Admins if you want that added, MANY people have tried, we have agreed that we will not add a counterpart until it is beyond doubt that there is one. or you can keep this up and get blocked for it, your call.

DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 00:12, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

We're not speculating on the English names of the Infernoids. There is no pattern as to which language they take the numbering from. Leave it as "???" for now. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:20, February 3, 2015 (UTC)

There will be no "I told you so." If it ends up being that name, it will be purely out of luck, and not because you had some foresight that the Wiki missed. You're also cherry-picking, making it seem like that's the only name we posted. We also posted "Un", "One", "Primo", to show that it's going to be a translation of "One", somehow. They're ultimately just guesses at the TCG name. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 21:48, February 3, 2015 (UTC)

Card Trivia

Please do not add random "similar appearance" trivia to trivia pages. They're only allowed when you can provide valid reasoning that the similarity was intentional. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 20:48, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

hi

nice 2 see u active again, 13 does not tlk much so just letting u no ok--Legacyhunters (talk • contribs) 15:20, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Discussions post about KyojiYagumo77

Hello. Why did you report that post, and so many of the replies on it? -BertH <staff /> (help forum | blog) 00:43, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Hello again. I want to apologize for setting the block on your account, that was a brief error which I thought I had corrected immediately afterward. I am currently taking stock of the situation in Discussions, with regard to 77 and others. I reviewed the email conversations you have had with my colleague as well. For the moment, please refrain from being so "report-happy" since it muddies the waters a bit. I am sure we'll be in touch again. Thanks. -BertH <staff /> (help forum | blog) 12:37, May 25, 2017 (UTC)