User talk:Scheepybird
Make sure to always add headers.
Contents
Welcome
Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the Bakura, King of Thieves (manga) page.
If you need help, you can consult these pages:
If you would like to make a suggestion or ask for assistance, feel free start a topic at the forums or contact an administrator.
Manga pages
When making pages for a character's manga counterpart, a copy/paste of their anime biography isn't enough, since it'll be misleading. It may be a better idea to read the manga first before making the page. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 16:37, September 7, 2015 (UTC)
I did read the manga, actually. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 17:54, September 7, 2015 (UTC)
All Killing Death Card
Your edit was reverted, because the category determines what the card normally does. It would have sent cards from Bakura's Deck to the Graveyard during that Duel, but he never did during that same Duel because of the curse that removed his Graveyard. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:55, October 19, 2015 (UTC)
Manga Duels
If you're going to be making pages for the manga chapters and linking cards in them, please link to their manga incarnations, not their OCG/TCG incarnations. Example: "[[Pot of Greed (manga)|Pot of Greed]]" --> "Pot of Greed". We do not want this: "[[Pot of Greed]]" --> "Pot of Greed". --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 22:28, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
The Effects of the Egyptian God Cards
Undo revision 3303877 by RichardJRansome1986 (talk) Otherwise Kaiba would have Special Summoned "Obelisk" in Attack Mode and destroy Yugi's "Dark Magician"
http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!_-_Episode_132 not what it says at the top of this page and Marik Special Summons Ra in Attack Position in Yu-Gi-Oh! - Episode 138 and in Yu-Gi-Oh! Duelist 208 v23 Page 16RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 13:26, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Kaiba must have missed out a detail. It wouldn't make sense if Kaiba had the option to intercept the attack in ATK Mode, inflict damage to Yugi, and destroy his card. He would
have obviously chosen that option.
- Also, that could explain why "Slifer" was Summoned in DEF Mode to intercept one of "Phoenix's" attacks (he would have taken no damage if he was Summoned in ATK Mode).
- "Phoenix" didn't intercept the attack of "Slifer" when it was Summoned in ATK Mode; it was in ATK Mode just to destroy Yugi's "Slifer" via its effect. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 20:33, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
if Ra didn't intercept Slifer's attack then why has Marik still got a monster on the field after slifer attacked? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 21:39, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
http://anime-mix.com/watch/Yu-Gi-Oh!-Duel-Monsters/Episode/138/The-Final-Face-Off---Part-1 this is the episode i am talking about RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 21:42, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
Kaiba must have missed out a detail. It wouldn't make sense if Kaiba had the option to intercept the attack in ATK Mode, inflict damage to Yugi, and destroy his card. He would have obviously chosen that option.
Iam not so sure about that. Kaiba seems to enjoy the challenge of dueling yugi and might get bored if he beat him to easily RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 21:48, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
I know that's the episode you're talking about. The reason his monster is still there is because the attacking monster was destroyed. And Kaiba swore to beat Yugi in his next Duel, so it's unlikely he'll just show some mercy and take a huge risk. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 21:57, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
you have a point there Kaiba swore revenge alot.
back to Ra i was under the impression Phoniex's effect was treated as an attack (well thats what is says on God Phoenix's page anyway) so if it's true is Phoniex able to attack from Defense Position? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 22:03, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
It was treated as an attack at that time, so he was Summoned in ATK Mode (Phoenix's effect might be a Quick Effect), so he activated the effect of "Phoenix" to destroy "Slifer", thus saving his monster from being destroyed. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 14:41, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
Never thought of that. Why does the anime have to be so misleading? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 22:08, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
Speaking of misleading when Egyptian God Phoenix is Special Summoned after Slifer attacks Juragedo Egyptian God Phoenix wraps his wings around Marik and Juragedo. Any Idea what that would represent? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 22:17, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly it would represent "Egyptian God Phoenix" protecting Mafik and "Juragedo"? Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 21:58, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
In your opinion would it also represent Egyptian God Phoenix intercepting Slifer's attack? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 14:27, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
- I suppose. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 14:38, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
Either he was Special Summoned in ATK Mode and attacked during Yugi's turn, or he was Summoned in DEF Mode, intercepted the attack, and, as I added on the Egyptian God Phoenix page, the monster could be destroyed when battling with God Phoenix. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 15:51, March 18, 2016 (UTC)
Hi Scheepybird i checked the episode and chapter details and it says Ra was Special Summoned and attacked during yugi's turn and Slifer being destroyed when battling with God Phoenix (i assume it counts as being destroyed by battle) and that he intercepted the attack when he is Special Sumoned. However it says that to intercept the attack he was Special Summoned in DEF Position but the anime and manga show him being Special Summoned in ATK Position. Could this be a mistake in the anime and manga discription because i personally can't see Egyptian God Phoniex being able to attack when it is in DEF position. What are your thoughts on this? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 17:07, March 18, 2016 (UTC)
The only conculsion i can come to because Slifer and Obelisk were Special Summoned in DEF Position when they intercepted attacks is that because Ra has a higer Hierarchy then Slifer and Oblisk it can intercept attacks when it is Special Summoned in both ATK and DEF Position? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 17:35, March 18, 2016 (UTC)
- They weren't specific in terms of its battle position, so I'm assuming he was spreading his wings because he was in Defensinve Position, and the rest was for dramatic effect. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 01:55, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
So if he was Special Summoned in DEF Positon that episode the next episode shows him attacking Slifer so is Ra either able to attack from DEf position or able to switch battle position after he is Special Sumoned like he is after he is Normal Summoned? or does the anime just enjoy confusing people? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 02:09, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- I don't suppose that either of you have tried checking which position the card is on the Duel Disk in either media? Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 02:36, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
Actually Sanokal K-T i have he is in ATK position on the duel disk in both media. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 02:39, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 03:13, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
The anime and other media had another option, which was destroying all the opponent's monsters allowing "Obelisk" to attack directly instead of gaining ATK (this was apparently the explanation used when Kaiba activated the effect against Yami Yugi). Scheepybird did Kaiba also acivate this effect against the Rare Hunters in episode 68 when he tag teamed with Yugi? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 15:10, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, he did. The only time he gained infinity ATK was in the Kaiba VS Duel Machine Duel and the Yugi VS Marik Duel. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 19:25, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. i thought it was odd in that episode when Kaiba said that the sacrifice increased his power and you don't see it increase. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 19:35, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think the Gods can change their battle positions even when they are Special Summoned, since Kaiba could have done that. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 19:28, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
i dont think so either just thought i would ask. Thank you for all the help you have given me over the past few days and i am sorry if it feels i have been hostile towards you it was not my intension to be. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 19:32, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- No problem (and I didn't think you were hostile). Have a good day. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 19:34, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
You too. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 19:37, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
Hi Scheepybird was just reading the discribtion for episode 131 and it says Slifer isn't destroyed by Obelisk's effect but doesn't say why. Do you know why this is the case when Egyptian Gods can be destroyed by the effects of other Gods? RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 23:25, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the anime ignored the hierarchy, and it's very inconsistent. So right now Slifer was unaffected by the effects of the gods of the same hierarchy. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 23:34, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
Thank you I wish they didn't ignore the Hierarchy it was less confusing and that way they wouldn't need cards like Class System. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 23:37, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
Now that you mention inconsistanceys i read yugioh duelist 89 when Kaiba is testing obelisk how come when kaiba activated his effect that makes his attack infinite and he attacks all your opponents monsters it just showed Obelisk attacking the three Blue-Eyes White Dragons and not Lord of D that didn't make sense to me. Does he attack all monsters in the anime or was that effect removed cause again Obelisk ignored Lord of D and just attacked Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon? its like in the manga and anime Lord of D does a vanishing act. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 14:10, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
- It's possible that it attacks all Attack Position monsters. Either that, or ignoring "Lord of D." was just for dramatic effect. Scheepybird (talk • contribs) 16:27, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
Could the same be said for episode 141 because the camera angle makes it appear that Obelisk is only attacking Ra. Myself personally I can't see Obelisk ignoring DEF position monsters same with Ra's instant attack effect RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 16:36, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
Hi Scheepybird just watched episode 54 where Kaiba tests Obelisk and according to the computer's Duel Disk Lord of D is in ATK position so i agree with you that it ignores Lord of D for dramitic affect. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 19:33, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
Hey I cant figure out how to use the forums to post but I was wondering if you knew anything about Misprinted Cards? because I have one that well... if I went through this much Effort to track down more information about it. Sorry to bother you I just have no other idea on how to figure this out and ive been searching for over a yearEseman (talk • contribs) 21:40, April 14, 2016 (UTC)
Hi Scheepybird hope you have been well. I just read your change on Obelisk's effect and i also noticed that Obelisk doesn't attack the Metal Fiend Token. I then came up with the theory that when Obelisk uses this effect if there are multiple copies of the monster Obelisk attacks then he attacks all the copies of that monster which is why in the manga when he is facing the Duel Computer all 3 Blue-Eyes White Dragons are destroyed. what to think about this. Kind Regards Richard RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 00:31, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Theory isn't exactly accepted (sorry to butt in). It's more likely that Obelisk CAN attack all monsters, but just didn't attack the Metal Fiend Token, since Yugi would have lost if he had owing to its effect. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 01:00, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
Sanokal K-T no need to apologise. So what your saying is that Obelisk has the option to attack all monsters but he doesn't have to. This may get me in trouble but i was under the empression that the whole page on the God's effects is based on Theroy because only the creator of Yu-Gi-Oh knows what their effects were RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 01:09, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, they way such effects are usually worded is "This card can attack all monsters your opponent controls once each", though there are exceptions. When it comes to stating their effects, you aren't entirely wrong, but that isn't right either. Since their effects are so funky then we do have to make assumptions. We don't just pull stuff out of thin air though, if you get my meaning (by that same admission, the whole Blue-Eyes thing was arguably not entirely out of thin air). Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 01:20, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
Yeah i know what you mean. thank you for helping me clear this up Sanokal K-T. RichardJRansome1986 (talk • contribs) 01:31, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
Jaden vs. Yugi
Scheepybird, it's agreed we don't know if Jaden lost to Yugi, because it wasn't explicitly shown. So please stop insisting Jaden lost. This is not the first time you were told we can't officially know if Jaden lost or not. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 16:14, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
