User talk:YamiWheeler

Welcome to YamiWheeler's Talk Page
Please remember to use a header and to sign your posts. To leave a message, click here.

Ninja'd

He actually mad that you went Ninja Master on him. I can see a way to get rid of that ninja; "Book of Moon" and "Nobleman of Crossout" - a common way to kill a stalling monster(s). --iFredCat 20:45, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that, now I can archive this talk page.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 20:52, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, friend - glad to help you with this. --iFredCat 21:02, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Hohohoho

I am sure he can't stand bouncing on your lap when you're wearing the red dress with white beard, which could reach the bottom of your ribcage. So that mean that user is getting a bag of coal on the Christmas this year. Haha. --iFredCat 20:59, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not gonna lie, I have no idea what you just said.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:24, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

I repeat myself, that user who just quitted on you while you "bounced" his monster on the third turn would not be a big fan of Santa Clause. I just physical joked by using the "Bounce" word referring to you bounced him on your lap while you're being "Santa". So yea, pathetic player he is. --iFredCat 21:28, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, right, yeah. It's annoying. Just a waste of time when people do that.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:45, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Tell them to beheading themselves if they tried to leaving the game. That will shut them up. --iFredCat 22:22, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Look at other Artwork Article

When "Elemental HERO Burstinatrix" was released her artwork was made more detailed compared to her anime artwork. The English version of "Elemental HERO Burstinatrix" has her outfit altered to be less revealing and her bust is reduced.

In the international version, less of Ehren's left leg is visible under her skirt.

Like the other Fortune Ladies, the International version of "Fortune Lady Dark" has >>her<< skin recolored, to make it look she's wearing more clothing and to make the card less revealing.

Yeah, all other Artworks do have that the same way, eh? Those three were actually disagreed. --iFredCat 18:50, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

And if you want Elfobia to be writing like that - you gotta have to wiping all of those articles that we didn't manage to cover and fixed them into the way you liked them to be. If you can't, then it's better to let Elfobia's article alone. Thank you for helping. =^_^= --iFredCat 18:55, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Don't you worry, I plan to. And thanks for being a freak who wants to treat cards like people.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 18:56, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yup, him too. --iFredCat 18:57, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Difference is that, he isn't real.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 18:58, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Reference

Is that ok for Tyler to have a reference of Trunks included? I am only check to make sure if that's okay or not. --iFredCat 14:45, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Glassjaw in Hall of Shame

Actually I have to disagree with the wording under that. Normally Glassjaw's effect cannot be activated if its detached as Xyz Material because it's normally as a cost. However, only in the displayed case was its usage correct because that is part of an effect. I'd still make that clear though; you said "for an Xyz Monster effect"; Glassjaw's effect says that it must be sent to the graveyard "by" an effect. 67.242.169.33 (talk) 22:16, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

That's all semantics, my Hall of Fame isn't a scientific dictionary and I'm not going to stiffen up the descriptions just because a few people might interpret it incorrectly. "Battlin' Boxer Lead Yoke" doesn't detach as a cost, period, so I don't see the confusion, anyway. Regardless, I specifically mentioned "for an Xyz Monster effect," not an "Xyz Monster cost" because I'm well aware of the difference, so there's no issue with the wording.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 22:47, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

I am with this IP-Addressed User - I had some discussion with this issue before and it was settling of Detach Glassjaw as Xyz Material is as of Cost, not by Effect therefore Glassjaw can and will missing his chance to activating. --iFredCat 22:39, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

You're obviously misunderstanding what he's trying to say. "Battlin' Boxer Glassjaw" will not "miss the timing" when detached by "Battlin Boxer Lead Yoke". That isn't what he's saying.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 22:47, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Other than Yoke, that is. --iFredCat 22:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Added a new unofficial ruling in, just to prevent the further "stupidity" argument. --iFredCat 12:41, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

FHD Remastered

hey! I was just wondering where you found the remastered picture of the Five-Headed Dragon. I have the four Duel Box DVDs which remastered the latter half of the series. But I was wondering if you knew anything about the first half of the second anime series and remastered DVDs. Rob52xbhs (talk • contribs) 22:28, June 6, 2013 (UTC)Rob

JOTL (TCG) names

If you need to know the TCG names, it can be found in this forum under JOTL (TCG) section. WinterNightmare (talk • contribs) 21:41, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, cool. Thanks. A bit busy ATM, I'll work on it soon.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:43, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Wonder Wings

Ark explained that nobody in Japan uploaded it yet 'cuz it seems the copyright laws are really tough currently, so we'll only be getting those when someone on NAC or Pojo or anywhere else orders the single from Japan and uploads it. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 15:02, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, Cheesedude showed me that link shortly after I PMed you. That sucks, but hopefully we'll get it soon. I'd just buy the CD, if it wasn't so expensive for only 1 track that I want. :/--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:06, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Argent Force and Number 99

You know, honestly, I agree with you, but I got into a big argument with one of the admins about it for about two days, and gave up because he wouldn't budge and it's ultimately his say. If he shows up again, you can try and convince him. The logic he tried to use on me was it was the same as why TG Hyper Librarian doesn't activate upon its own summon, even though that's a single card and we're dealing with two separate ones, so come up with your arguments now. I hope you get it, 'cause I made a really good OTK using Hope Dragun, Argent Chaos Force, and Otomatopia. A Wikia contirutor (talk • contribs) 20:28, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Mm, I'm chatting with that admin on Skype and everyone seems to be on the same page now regarding this.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 20:40, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Good to hear. If all goes well, I'd like to be able to post that OTK again. I was pretty upset when I had to pull it down, especially because whoever I was dealing with didn't seem to want to budge on the issue. A Wikia contirutor (talk • contribs) 20:46, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Raid Raptors in The Secret of Evolution

(This was originally on the talk page of PhotonLegion95, who removed it, ironically calling my argument irrational, despite him not even having a cohesive argument or reason for edit warring, period. I'm chronicling it here to show evidence of the edit war and his "stances" on the argument.)

Can I see your proof that other "Raid Raptor" monsters are in it?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:38, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

Evidently, you are mentally impaired and can't understand the argument I'm making, nor can you form an argument of your own. I'll be taking it to a moderator instead.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:45, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

1. I have made no insult to you what so ever. The fact that you decide to resort to that actually, says more about your mentality, and IMO your maturity, than it does about me. 2. Raid Raptors ARE an archetype. Raid Raptors - Rise Falcon, is apart of that archetype. Therefore the archetype is featured in Secrets of Eternity - PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 12:47, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

No, I'm calling it like I see it. You can't understand the basic argument of myself or Elvin Kara, who are more experienced on this Wiki than you are and KNOW how the Wiki defines an archetype. 1 card is NOT an archetype. Until more "Raid Raptor" monsters are confirmed, the archetype of "Raid Raptors" is not introduced in this Set. Moreover, rather than trying to even make an argument, you undo with comments like "it is an archetype except it and move on." We don't work like that on the Wiki. This is not the PhotonLegion95 Wiki. We don't do things just because you want us to, even if they're wrong. Now 2 people have disagreed with you, so yes, either you are mentally impaired or just really, really stupid. I'm putting my money on the latter.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:52, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, don't assume that I don't know how an archetype is defined. And, unless I'm mistaken there are cards supporting the Raid Raptors. Weather they are released or not DOES NOT negated the fact that they are an archetype. An archetype that is having tis cards represented in a set. PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 12:57, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

This is the problem with anime fanboys like you. "Raid Raptors" will likely BE confirmed as an archetype in this Set later on when more members are added, but you can't wait that long and choose to infect the Wiki with your speculation, which is akin to spreading misinformation and lies. People will look at that sentence "introduces the "Raid Raptors" archetype" and scroll down expecting to find several cards, and find only one. "Where is the archetype?" How do you even know there will be more added? Are you a Konami insider? No, you're just an ADHD fanboy with nothing better to do.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:57, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

You don't know how an archetype is defined if you're making this argument. "Raid Raptors" is not an archetype in the TCG/OCG yet. There is only one member confirmed. In the context of the page, which is "The Secret of Evolution," whether or not it is an archetype in the anime is completely irrelevant. Once again, you are spreading lies and misinformation.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:59, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not but Ok. PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 13:00, October 5, 2014 (UTC)