Forum:Imperial Order
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Lists Discussion → Imperial Order Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5545 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Why is imperial order still banned. it an ok card but not that good to banned. i mean ok so it like a cost last magic jammer but royal decree is not. Will it ever be unban. i want pple to give their opinion on this card.Magewei 03:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- One word: WHAT? Imperial Order is one of the most Broken cards ever conceived. All decks need spell card support in order to function, Trap Cards are useful too but not essential (unless if you are running a Counter Fairy deck). Not only is Imperial Order continuous, but it also has a maintenance cost, meaning that whenever you feel like activating a spell card, you don't pay the cost and that's it - Imperial Order is destroyed and you can do whatever you want! So, definetely no. Imperial Order is fine where it is, in the Forbidden list. --Darth Covah 09:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
i actually like that card
its one of my favorites; except i dont play officially, just casual duels with friends.The three egyptian gods 22:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
It is not that op
lets put it this way 700 LP a turn can only be used 11 turns and that doesnt include the damage you could take from battle so more like 4 or 5 turns that isnt even that bad lets put it this way limit or semi limit wouldnt be that bad with all the spell dependent decks out there lets slow down Tele-DAD a little so it doesnt win all the time and make the game little more fun for the poorer people Solastramage666 08:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
hey
thats a pretty hard card to get.The three egyptian gods 21:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I have 2 secret rare ones
Thats right I got two of them so there I want at least one to come back so I can use it and trade the other cause the price should go up to sweet Solastramage666 21:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
