Forum:Magician of Faith

Magician of Faith used to be an extremely important card in most decks... it has a good effect, terrible stats, but it's not so dangerous that it needs to be BANNED! Anyways, post what you think.. if it was a good choice to ban this card.. or not... --Tantara 23:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

This card needs to go back to being Limited. Having it banned but not banning DMoC is just a load of bullshit. (Sorry for the cussing.) MoF sped up a lot of decks and in competitive play, it made them more exciting. If anyone has the number to the people who make the ban list, please tell me.

It's too powerful, that's why it's banned. SuperTeddy 05:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

• It wasn't that powerful! limited was ok, but banned? it gets you back a single spell... that's it... a SINGLE spell... --Tantara 13:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

You could recycle Monster Reborn. SuperTeddy 13:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

MoF need banning, DMoC will possiblly be banned but that day Yugioh dies, for DMoC is possibly the best staple ever.

• When Monster Reborn comes back, I can see this being back to one, along with Call of the Haunted.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
  • When Monster Reborn gets banned this time around, I can see MoF coming back. However, CotH won't get unbanned unless they major/minor limit Jinzo. Subcontinental86 15:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

• This card didn't need banning, only limiting. Think of all the decks that were ruined because of the banning of their staple cards... --Tantara 19:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
• Yeah it is useful for fusions. Recycle is similar to MOF. Airblade86 17:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
• I think it only needed to be limited. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 15:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I think that once Monster Reborn gets banned, MoF will become major limited. Also, I still think DMoC will remain major limited once they ban Monster Reborn. Animedude3000 17:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

• MoF - limited/DMoC - limited --Tantara 01:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Magician of Faith is not really that powerful. Now and days there are so many cards that can take her out easily. You need to wait a turn to activate her effect on a normal basis. By that time your opponent will have come up with some lame stupid Cyber Dragon fusion to pummel you to a bloody pulp and all you have to show for it is Monster Reborn or scapegoat. Doesn't really help if ya ask me. "A" single magic card cannot insure your victory as does "A" single monster. It takes a combined strategy to win. --User:Overlordzorc

Too right, Overlordzorc. One card alone doesn't ensure your victory. If that was the case, then the minimum number of cards in a Deck would be 1. Getting back on topic, "Magician of Faith" was just too weak for a ban to be necessary. And, as has been mentioned several times, only gives you 1 Spell Card from your Graveyard. I can understand how this can be useful and turn a Duel around, but still. There are plenty of cards that can turn a Duel around. "Man-Eater Bug" could be particularly devastating, especially with a Set "Michizure", but you don't see those cards on the ban list, do you? It's just not over-powered enough to ensure your victory, by itself or in a combo (since "Tsukuyomi" was banned, thank you Konami), and hence, should not be on the ban list. It should be Semi-Limited, or Limited at most. But banned? I think not. --Shane Kaiba 19:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

limited should be the verdict

magician of faith is just plain dumb...

a single spell could never ever help a player so easily...

i think these card i just too much weak to be forbidden...

I agree... and remember to sign your post with four tildes --Tantara 12:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

YUGIOH HAS OFFICIALLY DIED! Haou 02:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Haou

i don't like that it's banned. i think it should be semi-limited, and here's why: the owner of this card (or cards) may have an easy way to get a spell card back, but that player is also missing out on monsters with much better stats (that is, if they're keeping their deck close to 40 cards).

as for monster reborn, you can only have 1 in your deck. sure, it's possible to use m.r., then use it gain b/c of MoF, and even again if MoF is semi-limited, but not very likely. and even if you did get this kind of action, you're less likely to have big monsters in the graveyard because you've been getting these cards instead! i think you should be able to have 2, esp. when you think of other cards with better effects that are not banned!

Redeemed 05:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I Demand an Unban!

I think MoF should be Unbanned..

I mean seriously.. wat's scarier MoF or LADD? ... and LADD isn't even SEMI LIMITED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't get this world. -sigh- =-[

I know really! that's why I started this thread...!... I mean... Even Sangan's scarier... --Tantara 01:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Agreed: Unban!!

First of all... I would like to just say "one spell is enough to turn around/win the duel whatever". I would say it really depends on the Spells you use, as you could recycle Pot of Avarice and add 5 cards to your deck and draw 2; another Pot of Greed. Or you could add "Umi" back to your hand and of course use its ability with Ocean Dragon Lord - Neo-Daedulus. Of course personally I think the ban is rubbish, but I do think MoF's effect should be limited to Normal Spells only.

Agreed!

I believe an un-ban is in order. Straight to Limited I mind you, but an un-ban none-the-less, especially with DMoC out of the picture. However, I do see a potential threat concerning the new Book of Eclipse still roaming free.

Please Unban

I do realize that this card can single handedly win games for you. Still, so do other cards such as Judgment Dragon and Gladiator Beast Gyzarus. And this one is even slower, u have to use its flip effect. With so many destruction cards around, it's hard for it to even pull off its effect. UNBAN IT!!! Animedude3000 02:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Definatly

I agree and you know what else... needle worm should be limited... a friend of mine has three and I get deck every single time!! ----Alienchrcol 10:36 (PT) October 07, 2008

• As a Needle Worm player, I can attest to the annoyances faced by my opponents when they strike the worm. However, do not forget that the milling does nothing when you're getting beaten down to the ground within the exact same turn. You also run the risk of getting the card the opponent wants into the graveyard too, or getting them closer to their wanted card. --Gadjiltron 03:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

i think that it should be unbanned. i run a limiter deck. with three princesses of tsurugi, and two books of moon. along with balloon lizards, and raging flame sprites. and the main concern is that if my princesses of tsurugi get attacked, i need to use my MoF to get either my books of moon or my monster reborn back so i can inflict direct damage to my opponent. i mean for crying out loud, my strongest attack is 1600. i need to be able to bring back my level limit area B if it gets destroyed by one of my opponents magic cards. it has too many uses in my deck to be taken out. without MoF my deck cannot operate.

about banning cards

I'm just curious of who banns the cards, how to contact them, and if they have any criteria on why/how cards are banned, and if they ever release any info on why certain cards are banned (i just hate guessing is all, and would like the official statements from them).

oh, and i agree, MoF should be limited, not banned. Klovasos 00:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

-I agree on the MOF limit 72.49.148.130 03:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)RoGE

disagree

One card can actually make a difference, especially if its a limited cheap card or a card like lightning vortex, to turn around the duel, MoF should stay banned since its a unbalanced card obviously. Cloak007 06:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Vote: Unban!

MoF should definitely be unbanned. All the GB Fusions, the new Alien Synchro on its way... lots of game winners out that are definitely more unbalanced then she is. Still though, I think she should be major limited, as having three copies would just really break the game, and only two would make it a little more challenging, but not as fair as only one.Katsuma-San 12:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Vote: Unban

I think it should be unbanned now. At the time it was released it was a threat. But now there are lots of ways to negate flip effects. And with only 400 DEF it would hurt if MoF get's hit by a piercing effect. --DarkMastero 00:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)