Forum talk:WDC Week 3
Judging Criteria[edit]
Judges, the criteria is below.
- Relativity: (Out of 10 points): This justifies how much the deck is related to the topic and how the entrant approached it. If it was creative and showed the intention of creating a new way, the entrant receives full points.
- Efficiency: (Out of 10 points): This justifies how the deck achieves a flow of fast and powerful. If the entrant used ways to maximize efficiency, he or she receives full points.
- Playability: (Out of 10 points): This justifies how much the deck is playable - how it is seen through others' eyes. For example, if this deck was given to a very random player, could they grasp the concept and use it to its full potential? If the entrant used ways to maximize playability, he or she receives full points.
- Overall Power: (Out of 10 points): This justifies how the deck performs against decks circulating in the TCG. If it shows much potential and what judges judge to be powerful, then the entrant receives full points.
Scoring Area[edit]
Judges please place your scores below. NOTE: I, Chris427 will be judging first for this week. Judges please be strict for this week's challenge.
- Due to number of disqualifications, this week's challenge will not be judged. As for WDC Week 4, we will be postponing it until further notice. Please stand by. Thank you and sorry for your trouble. Chris427 18:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
wdc[edit]
what does wdc stand for.--Gyzarus 02:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- how can you get bard from the wdc.--Gyzarus 08:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
