Talk:Charmer
|
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Charmer. | |
|---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Why is there no Light Charmer or Familiar Possessed Version of that new Dark Charmer.
They wanted to add other cards in the sets first. They arent really playable cards anyway. 121.219.29.198 09:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- I sure they are going to make them, just not as quickly as the others. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 10:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
The Light Charmer's familiar is likely to be a card like Petit Angel, but it would be cool if it were Winged Kuriboh, Kuribon, Watapon, or Hanewata. However, if this were so, then Dharc's familiar would have likely been Kuriboh instead of Meda Bat.--Dragonking 00:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, when Charmers first came out, they were only little students (just Charmer) before they learned to be a Familiar-Possession (maybe next set or later), therefore Dharc would coming much later, and Light version will be latest one to arrive, only that she have to continue practicing learn the power of light. Since of Lightsworn monsters, they're very hard to control though. --FredCat100 13:34, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
Contents
Light Charmer??[edit]
Asukatenjouin 12:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC) I found a picture that looks like the light charmer. I'll send it to you all who wanted to see it, so just give me your email.
I just have to say this...[edit]
These cards would own an Elemental Hero deck. You could use the the (Name) the (Element) charmer to take control of the E.Heores, the (Verb)ing (Name) cards to get more of that element and Spiritual Art cards to tribute them for there effect. The Familar Possessed cards could be some offence, seeing as the E.Heroes have weak attack and defence, and it doesn't matter what possesion there in thanks to the there effect. This applies to other decks too, but this one comes to mind.TehHock 16:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Indeed they would XD, I always say, "Played right, The Charmers can take down almost any deck, I mean, My Charmer deck has a high streak of victories, Even against my little brothers Sacred Beast Deck. --Vampier Master 21:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better if.....[edit]
They finish the Charmer set, Then move on to making all these Useless Archetypes?, I mean, Not to sound offensive or anything, But a Spider Archetype?, Ugh, If they hate the Charmers so much then just finish Dharc, Make and finish the Light Charmer (Who I think will be named 'Hikari'), then make whatever useless cards they want.--Vampier Master 07:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I wish they would finish this set. I haven't had a chance to use them yet, but I like the charmers alot. I wish they would finish with Dharc and make the light charmer, who's familiar is going to be Happy Lover, I think.
This set is too full of potential to go unfinished -- Shaay
You think someone could[edit]
Put something like this on the Charmers page? http://i50.tinypic.com/14o3ty9.png I mean, I'd do it myself, but I just don't know how to yet :P. And I think it'd be better if we had SOMETHING like this on the Charmers page. --Vampier Master 13:23, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
Is it just me or...[edit]
are all the charmers women? dharc doesn't look like one or is he/she? can someone help me?
july 4th 2010 happy Independence day!!!1!!!!
- Yea, they're all women. Except in germany, Dharc is treated as male there. --FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 20:26, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, from what I've found out, Dharc's a guy, all the others are girls though. If you want I'll give you the link, my friend who posted some hard proof's post is to long to put here.Vampier Master (talk • contribs) 21:41, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, here's the link
http://kazemachi.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d2pmpam You'll have to read the whole description, He doesn't seem to speak English fully 100%, but he speaks it well enough so you can understand what he's saying.Vampier Master (talk • contribs) 10:02, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Divine Monsters[edit]
The articles says their are not likely to be a Divine charmer because there are no divine cards except for the Egyptian Gods. Recently though, the polar gods were also shown to be divine. --Qim1 (talk • contribs) 02:15, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Dunno though if DIVINE will become a full fledged attribute like the others though, Right now, it would only have Yugi's Gods, and the Polar Gods, so their wouldn't be much for the DIVINE Charmer to take over, even then, Obelisk is immune to a targeting effect, but hey, we can still hope, I'd LOVE for their to be another Charmer X3.Vampier Master (talk • contribs) 10:04, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Divine probably won't become a full fledged attribute and there probably won't be another charmer, I was just mentioning that because the article said that only the Egyptian Gods were divine. The Polar gods haven't been released, but that could change. Though I wouldn't mind if there's another charmer either.--Qim1 (talk • contribs) 13:48, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Konami might be reviving this archetype![edit]
- As mentioned in Card Trivia:Winda, Priestess of Gusto, along with Ritua Erial, they both look similar to the respective charmers. Not only that, but the name (obviously) are similar too with a couple of extra letters. Perhaps we will soon see a FIRE and EARTH archetype including the "re-made" charmers?--Moneypony (talk • contribs) 07:37, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
ALL THE CHARMERS ARE OUT[edit]
ALL THE CHARMERS ARE OUT
- All the Charmers out.Could someone please update the image on the Charmers page?
Seriously there are tons of pictures, whoever chose that picture of a mousepad, seriously no offense. But seriously? A mouspad? It wasn't even a full picture. And now that all possessed and charmer forms are out, please update image. --Charming Hoshi (talk • contribs) 17:24, April 10, 2017 (UTC)Charming Hoshi April 10, 2017
