Talk:D/D/D

This is the talk page for discussing the page, D/D/D.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Nomenclature

I think we should define a standard nomenclature to these DDD monsters until they gain official English names. For example, right now, we have some named "king of (...)" and some named "(...) king", as well as some with adjective and some without adjective (all 3 have adjectives in their Japanese name, but probably won't have in their English names). My suggestions:

• DDD Alexander the King of Gales → DDD Alexander the King of Gales/Gale King
• DDD Temujin the Raging Inferno King → DDD Temujin the King of Inferno/Inferno King
• DDD Caesar the Surging Waves King → DDD Caesar the King of Waves/Wave King (or other word which means a huge/violent wave) LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 16:31, July 6, 2014 (UTC)

Article name

It doesn't have to be "D/D/D". It could be "D/DD" or "DD/D" instead. This is why I feel we shouldn't have moved the "DD" pages to begin with. The poll actually says "name are not final". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:06, January 26, 2015 (UTC)

King and Overlord

I would recommend not moving everything else to "King" just yet. The US and UK sites are directly contradicting each other here. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:43, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

But "Pendragon" was released, so wouldn't its naming scheme take precedence? --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 19:08, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

The point were at now, I think we should wait for the CORE list to leak fully, which should be no later than Wednesday, before we make anymore D/D/D moves, given we have 2 more of them there and we will have a solid basis for the naming scheme, than just the one official name. PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 19:12, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

Separate Kings from Office Hierarchy

I think we should separate the list of D/D/D monsters into two parts: One for the Office Hierarchy and Events, the other for famous Kings, Knights, and ConquerorsNumberc17 (talk • contribs) 05:20, December 21, 2015 (UTC)