Talk:Dark World

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Dark World.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Talk Pages are only for the discussion on how to improve the article. Please post your questions on the Rulings Forum and general discussion on the Forum.

Depth Amulet

"Depth Amulet" does not apply to the Deck, due to the fact that discarding to negate the attack is considered a cost.

• Do you hear that sound? That's the sound of me banging my head against my Desk. From the Card Rulings:Depth Amulet Page: "Discarding 1 card is not a cost. It is part of the resolution of the effect." Therefore, Depth Amulet does work for this Deck. Altyrell (talk • contribs) 03:16, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Kk, but don't be such a jerk about it xD

List of cards

I don't see the complete list of Dark World cards. Only a broken link to Template:Dark World. —This unsigned comment was made by 186.137.79.76 (talk • contribs) 13:29, August 9, 2011

Yes, you're right, I tried to get it back to normal with a punch. And it didn't work. But for you, please be sure to read the top box; Sign your Edits with four Tildes at end of your comments, if you're talk in Forum or Talk Page. --FredCat 13:37, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

Question

Why is this effect table needed? IonCharge (talk • contribs) 23:37, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

I have found in the past that many new players and, suprisingly, quite a few experienced players do not understand just how the "Dark World" effects work. This is even with the "Problem-Solving Card Text" change. I was just at a tournament where people were thinking that the Discard effect only worked when the original owner's effect sent it to he Graveyard. Then there was a person playing "Exchange" and that just got even more confusing... I thought that the table would add a little interest to the page while also heading off some questions in the future while also answering questions now. I usually didn't have a problem with the amount of questions I have seen about this archetype, however with the new Deck, it seems like every new player is getting it and they all have questions. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 05:02, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Section: Standard Dark World Deck, change?

Hey, I dislike the drop-down method for card lists. Would anyone agree or disagree if I changed it into a list like on Alien and Frog? That type of list allows card usage ideas to be left along-side and seems better in my opinion. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 07:01, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Better Pictures are needed for the page

Okay, I'll admit it's not a bad start with the dark world monsters, but it's time to update it with the newst bad guys to join their ranks.

A bit confusing

I'm looking at the titles beloing to Brron, Sillva, Goldd, Ghapha, Reign-Beaux, Lantium and the other high star monsters for this archtype. Their ranks are cofusing me. Bronn is the Mad King, Sillva is the Warlord, Goldd is the Wu-Lord, Grapha is the Dragon Lord, Latinum is the Exarch, Reign Beaux is the Overlord and Colorless is the Choas King

Does this mean, there is more than one ruler of Dark World?

This is not really major. Goldd, Sillva and Grapha are actually Gods. Consider Reign Beaux a government type figure. Brron is the reigning monarch, and Colourless doesn't exist. IonCharge (talk • contribs) 19:10, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

Updated Guide

Chaos Gallade and others. I wrote the guide as an anonymous user a few months ago. Now I am updating it stop changing it back you are getting annoying.

Tebow Time (talk • contribs) 15:37, April 14, 2013 (UTC)