Talk:New Order

This is the talk page for discussing the page, New Order.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Fact

Is it possible they are a counterpart to CXyz-s? Energy X ∞ 20:10, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

More likely they are counterpart to Numbers, considering that both their summoning uses space like overlay network.Kriksxx (talk • contribs) 21:01, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

I'd suggest they are a counterpart to CXyzs, Number C as well as plain Numbers, The first two as this series is the only one that utilizes Rank-Up monsters with out the power of chaos and a counterpart to numbers being the general ＮＯ vs Ｎｏ．etc. --slave(command) 23:57, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

New Order

New Order, not New Orders. Like Numbers and Number. Elvin Kara (talk • contribs) 18:14, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

The fact of the matter is, "New Orders" has not been mentioned in the Yu-Gi-Oh! English dub, nor has Konami TCG mentioned anything about the series. Also, you cannot use the argument that the English dub calls Japanese "Numbers" Spell/Trap Cards "Number" cards, as they broke that pattern with "Numbers Evocation" in the English dub. So, there is no solid proof that "New Orders" should be renamed "New Order"... yet. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 22:43, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Template

Ummm... Shouldn't someone try to fix the Series Template? I would, but I have absolutely no idea how to do that. KuribohMaster666 (talk • contribs) 22:01, February 22, 2015 (UTC)