Talk:Photon

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Photon.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Delete Mark

Can we get rid of this page? Just because some cards have one word in common it doesn't make them an archetype.--Rayjayjay (talk • contribs) 16:54, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

But now it's already there, I think we should leave it. If you hate this look at "Yubels" archetype there are only 3 members and 1 related.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 17:33, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

The reason Yubels are an archetype is because their effects actually refer to one another and have similar effects. Besides the one word in their name these cards have nothing in common with one another and have no support cards--Rayjayjay (talk • contribs) 19:40, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

This should be deleted if that's the real reason, (but there also only Light monsters with "light" support cards) or we could wait for "Zexal episode 13". "188.81.123.69" was the one that made it.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 21:14, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Just checked the card list for Photon Shockwave and I can confirm that this is NOT an archetype.--Rayjayjay (talk • contribs) 19:30, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

If that's true you can delete it if you want.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 22:44, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

Only sysops (admins) can delete articles. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:25, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

This still hasn't been deleted yet?--Rayjayjay (talk • contribs) 15:56, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

It's because it has no Delete Notice, so it cannot be delete unless there is one on the article. --FredCat 16:05, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

That, and there is no consensus to delete it. We have one person arguing to delete it and another arguing to keep it. It's clearly a theme, so I'd be in favor of keeping it. It's certainly more of an archetype than "Bamboo Sword" or "Baboon of the Forest" Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:55, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't necessarily need a {{Delete}} tag to be deleted; that's more a nicety alerting readers to the possibility. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 04:56, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

That therefore I joined your side, Coffeedude, this article is to keeping. --FredCat 17:01, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Deleting this wasn't my idea. Whose Coffeedude. Does he have a "yugioh.wikia.com" account.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 20:30, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

That's what FredCat calls me now since I made several references to bad editing while not having enough coffee first in the past. He does not stop calling me that, despite my asking him to stop. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:08, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

That's because he's a "cat". Cats need play time too. so he just substituting "Cheese" with "Coffee"; in real life they don't go together. Don't take "Coffee" literally.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 23:37, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Yup, I love to taunt other users with their pun and bad references. --FredCat 00:48, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Just don't go too far with it; some users take it literally. A funny name for "Cheesedude" if "Cheese Warrior" or "Clear Cheese Dragon"; Field Spell "Cheese World"; ATK name "Cheese Malicious Stream" (Not sure).--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 02:01, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Dude, it's just 1 name I changed... Want me to go further by making your name turning mug? --FredCat 02:03, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind. That was just an idea--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 03:19, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Looks like you couldn't come out with any.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 20:05, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

• King archetype is going to be deleted. That person's reason "Not an archetype ()". I think this will be next--Wasn't 22:52, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

Now there is a support so this is gonna stay. -164.78.252.244 (talk) 08:15, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

that will be because of "Photon Lizard"; now this has to stay.--Wasn't 12:40, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

the deck can use Elemntal HERO shining in it because of neos alius im currently building this deck and so far so good.

Sacred Status

shouldn't the photons be considered sacred now that new information has been provided by dr. faker? the photon monsters' power rivals that of the numbers and the photon cards were created from energys from barian world same as the numbers are made of energys from astral world which makes them polar opposites like the eygptian and wicked gods or the signer dragons and the earthbound immortals. the cards also give their users photon based powers such as photon hand and photon change.DalekSupreme13 (talk • contribs) 09:20, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Barians' are the opposites of Numbers as they are used by the people of Barian. Photons werent specified to be created from the Barian World, just from "another dimension". So if ur saying that its from Barian, you are speculating with we do not post on this wikia. The Photon "powers" are not powers but just devices created by Dr. Faker and are technological in origin ----SharkTenjo 09:24, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

then why do we list the meklords as they are technological in origin?DalekSupreme13 (talk • contribs) 16:56, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

What i mean by technological in origin is the Photon "powers" not the cards. ----SharkTenjo 13:19, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Sacred??

Why is the Photon archetype part of the Sacred Cards? There's nothing sacred about these series of cards.