Talk:True Draco

Rename

The "True King"s should have been named "True Dracoking." But they weren't, and this resulted in the inclusion of "True King" in all TCG support cards for "True Draco." Since anything that supports "True Draco" will always support "True King," shouldn't both of their names be in this article's name? Lightning Laxus (talk • contribs) 05:25, May 20, 2017 (UTC)

No, I don't think so. The archetype is the "True Draco" archetype because that corresponds to the shorter Japanese string; it would be possible for Konami to later create support for the "True King" archetype without support for the "True Draco" archetype. (Compare "Neos" and "Neo Space", or "Utopic" and "Utopia".) Even if that's unlikely, I think it's a good policy to determine how we name articles. --SnorlaxMonster 05:56, May 20, 2017 (UTC)

Well, in the last effect of "True King of All Calamities" says '"True Draco" and "True King" monsters', so that's one reason to support changing this article's name to that. After all why would True King of All Calamities mention True Draco monsters when there currently are no [Level 9] True Draco monsters that special summon themselves from the hand by destroying their owners' monsters (but only True King monsters that do so)?--Saffira, Queen of Dragons (talk • contribs) 23:45, November 13, 2017 (UTC)