Talk:Unicorn

Untitled

This "archetype" is pretty good with only Unicorn Familiar having a different pronounced name than the others.Zeromaro 04:16, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Could we please delete this "archetype"? It has no support cards, none of the monsters have similar effects and as pointed out, one of monsters is even written differently in japanese. Just because they all have similar names it doesn't make them an archetype, this article is about as pointless as the Warriors article. 91.85.128.185 13:04, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

I agree about deleting it. Just doesn't seem like an archetype at all. More like cards with some relatively vague relation between them.PoirotH 13:26, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

However Unicorn cards can be very powerful when used correctly. By taking time to gather all their support cards, you could very possibly have a winning deck on your hands.

We're not saying that they suck. We just agreee that this page is pretty pointless.-- HHTurtle  (Talk) 15:03, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

I think the archetype deserves his page. We have a lot of pages very bad archetypes and cards that dont have nothing to do each others like the Syntetic angels.

how do you make a unicorn deck? —This unsigned comment was made by 68.193.206.83 (talk • contribs)

I think this deck haves potential just give it time. It need to have more staples —This unsigned comment was made by 24.184.2.60 (talk • contribs)

At least one of them have being in Deck Destruction. --FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 00:32, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

and the archetype is used by secondary characters in 5D's if we have a page with the "Yomi" archetype the "unicorns" should have one...

In my opinion, the page should be about Team Unicorn specific cards as the archetype, not just called Unicorn. Kinda like how Earthbound Immortals is an archetype but it covers a whole range of cards from spiders to winged-beasts according to the dark signer wielding them.

it needs help competimg with other decks but it at least needs a "corn" page so people can learn how to make it, like me.

Even if its not an official archetype, many fans considered it as one so it should have its own page (Team unicorn specific cards would be ok), so that anyone who wants to make a corn-deck gets a list with cards to use. They dont share names like heroes but by design they have a conection. Just like key mouse, lock-cat and chain-dog which are clearly conected by the design, but not by names, nor do their effects mention each other. Also, there are pages about metagame, beatdown decks and so on, despite the fact,that neither "beatdown" nor "metagame" are mentioned in card effects or the rulebook they are useful information pages that help players to create the decks they want. --SG-27 (talk • contribs) 08:03, April 7, 2011 (UTC)