Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 136

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 136.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Deletion

Wasn't this preview part of the real batch? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:25, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

thought/think it was! ? :/ swear it was same source as episode 135! ... --slave(command•works) 07:55, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

It was, but then NAS removed it from the website at the same time they removed 137-141, meaning 136 is fake. Also, I think the source you speak of only gave us the real 130-132.Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers (talk • contribs) 11:51, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

ahh my mistake then... never the less "same time they removed 137-141, meaning 136 is fake." is a non-sequitor. Also I haven't seen those previews but pretty much essentially if it came form NAS and NAS hasn't said otherwise it was not fake, maybe redacted and retconed and not canon but still legitimate not fake or fan-made... (if however someone has proof / exceeding evidence that the site was hacked...) --slave(command•works) 09:25, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Too many monsters ATM

Hang on a minute. I only remember seeing C65 in the preview for this episode. Where did 104 and those other monsters come from? --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 19:09, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

They're seen on Vector's Duel Disk during the preview. Just very faintly and briefly. HPZ - O.N.E. (talk • contribs) 19:15, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

One of those moments where you need to pause at just the right time, right? --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 23:36, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

There was also a magazine scan that shownd C65/102/103/104 being used by Vector, but I believe that has already been used and someone undid that particular edit saying it didn't specify. Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 23:46, December 30, 2013 (UTC)