User talk:BurnItDown

Ok, slow down... we don't need Categories for the moment, especially not with only 6 mainstream Attributes to be included in the example you created.

Plus, they're also capable of slowing down database access, and since this site will be a big searcher at one point, any slowdown is to be avoided, if possible. --TwoTailedFox 18:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I got it. But you still might want to consider category pages for broader fields (no YGO pun intended) like all Trap cards, Spell cards, Monster cards, etc. But yes, I suppose I got a little carried away. Also, a lot of the Type/Attribute pages can use some elaboration and expansion. As of now, they're all basically two sentences and a list of a few cards. I'll work to correct that. --BurnItDown 18:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• The main problem with the Categories, is the information they don't provide. With the custom pages, they can be referenced by Sets, effects, and by any and all properties under the sun. The Broad Fields can still listed Alphabetically, and still retain the same element of browsing you can get for Categories. I'll probably undertake doing that task. --TwoTailedFox 19:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• • Alright then. I'm new here by the way, so forgive me if I do something wrong. I learn quickly on these things, though. I'll let you handle the important stuff. --BurnItDown 19:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)