User talk:Cheesedude/Archive10

Visitor stats special page

Per your request, my comment was "here's one that I've wanted for a very long time: a special page of some form that displays anonymized, aggregate visitor stats (browser, screen res, etc.)". If you or a staffer would like some elaboration, feel free to ask. =) 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 07:33, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Stardust Radiance Dragon

Anyway, I've only started arguments against Project:Translation; I haven't gotten into any edit wars over it. Yes, I don't support it, but I still discussed what I was going to do. You can't block me for "repetitive" anything; control your anger, dude! And, Project:Translation is not a valid enough reason to undo my edit. I explained that if Stardust is used as an adjective, then it loses the meaning of being a name for the dragon; you haven't offered any counterarguments to that. Project:Translation is only that in name; it deals with localizations, not the trans parameter. Please explain your reason as to why the trans parameter name would be the same as the localization/unofficial English name! (I have no idea if it's confirmed.) Simply stating Project:Translation isn't going to cut it. MadRest 20:07, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Bad news for you, Senior D, Cheesy's a member of Organize who wrote those names in DN. And I would watching my own anger if I were you. --iFredCat 20:31, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and I accept that as the localization, but not the translated name. Those two things are different. The Org (which have stated numerous times themselves) do localizations. And I'm not the one angry enough to risk my adminship by biasly banning other users. Or is he willing to provide the list of all the repetitive, repetitive page moves I've done because I've disagreed with their localizations? MadRest 20:36, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

The way you talked, it sound like you're little anger on Cheesy for banning on your account. So watch it careful and just listen each other. Talk before post. --iFredCat 20:39, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Not quite angry; I enjoy antagonism every once and a while.MadRest 20:45, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Then you're enjoying the longer banning if Cheesy made up his mind. --iFredCat 20:50, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

No, I will be enjoying the revoking of adminship if he doesn't offer all the ways I've vandalized Project: Translation's localizations, repetitively moving the pages with The Organization's localizations, or any way I've actually disagreed with their localizations in a blockable manner. MadRest 20:55, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

This will be my last comment toward you here - you're actually arguing against the Admins. And you will fallen even lower than dirt if you kept it up. Good luck hold your "ground". --iFredCat 21:01, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, no, you're allowed to argue with admins; they don't hold any higher ground in an argument, especially if they're biased. MadRest 21:06, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

D, you confuse localization with translation. We don't localize. We translate shit and adapt it in a fashion that's linguistically accurate. Localization, is adapting something for a completely different culture by completely changing the name, context, and cultural background. Unless there's a precedent, we translate shit as accurately as possible according to all context, puns, and other things that exist. We only localize as a last resort. Furthermore, you fail to notice time and time again that there are a SHITLOAD of puns in this game, a lot of them deliberate. Japanese, Chinese, and Korean have a VERY long history of using characters for different purposes or using different characters to mean the same word. This is in part due to a combination of illiteracy and in part due to a unique culture of word games that stem from Han characters. If you can't understand this, frankly, you shouldn't be translating and the admins have every right to block your editing rights for the sake of quality control. If you're arguing that this should be "Flashing Carat Dragon - Stardust", then you're blatantly WRONG, because "Senkou" is a pun on "Flashing Light" or "Radiance" or whatever word you choose for it based on the context. The "Carat" part is nothing more than a fancier way of saying it or a reference to old linguistics where people used to spell things wrong. Same for Enmaryu Red Demon's. It is not Jeweled Demon. The "Enma" is a direct reference to King Enma that WAS written as such in some texts for all the reasons I've stated, and basically grants Red Demon's the title as King of the Underworld or Ogre King. Seriously, take a proper professional translation course or ask a scholar on the basics of proper translation and the flexibility you have to show at times and they'll usually say the same thing. Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 21:26, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

No, they're not allowed to block me for that; they can state it to me and I can refute it, but the reason given was that I repetitively went against your localizations. Yes, I did. By posting my arguments on the Forum or Talk pages. When did I actually move any of your localizations? And your card names are mostly localizations with no trace of translation (I agree Senkou is a pun on radiance, but kou (karat) is also a reference to the golden aura around the monster; you can't just pick one pun, and forget about the other). Also, the issue here is that Stardust is the monster's name; it loses its meaning when you use it as an adjective, like you did. I can go into how many of your other localizations aren't accurate translations, which you seem to insist, but this isn't the place for that. Still, there was no reason to block me; I had a valid reason for adding the translated name, and he seemed to state that I've been doing this constantly for days on end, when I can't remember any time that an edit war was started over how I disagree with your localizations. The most I did was argue on the Forum, which I am allowed to do, and it was resolved peacefully. I actually just edited this page twice, while providing my reason, but Cheesedude only gave "Translation" as a reason, which doesn't in any way refute or explain how my reason would be wrong. MadRest 21:32, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Master D, I explicitly warned you that we could, and would, block you if you continued raising trouble over this issue. Cheesedude's block is perfectly in line with this warning, and he will not be reprimanded for it in any way. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 21:35, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Let it go, it's a one-day ban if you stop now. The Wiki majority has decided to go with The Organization's translations. You were warned by Dinoguy that if you continued to defy that decision, that action would be taken against you. You don't really have a leg to stand on, it's literally you vs. the Wiki majority, regardless of whatever point you think you have. Accept the ban, let it expire and then get with the program and start working with The Organization's translations.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:37, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

They are not translations; they're localizations (I can still add the translated name if it differs from the localization). Dinoguy, you make it sound like I can't refute any of their localizations. I can do that. You can block me after I continue editing even after the discussion about the card name was resolved. I didn't do any of that. There wasn't any discussion about the name when I edited it; he just blocked me out of anger. I gave my reason for the translation; Cheesedude didn't. As I see it, he should be the one to be blocked. For the Incarnate Dragons, when they were moved, did I move the page immediately, or did I post on the Talk page to say that I don't disagree with them, and wait until it was over? And I can still raise trouble over this issue. The translated names and their localizations are not the same thing; if they don't prove how they are the same, then they are doing the same thing as a vandal; he can't just say "Translation" and expect the problem to be solved. A discussion needs to be opened on whether the localization and the translation are the same. What he did is block me for arguing about their localizations, which I can do, since their card names aren't absolute. MadRest 21:47, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

OK, this is getting out of hand. D, it's been explained to you (both by administrators, and some established translators) why we do what we do. The buck stops with me, and I'm declaring this conversation over. Cheesedude will not be sanctioned in any way, as his conduct has been above reproach in this matter. When we explain something, we expect it to be followed. Decisions like this are not up for debate. If you continue this vein of conduct, your ban will be extended until you learn,--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 21:54, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

That's what I feared, Founder, at least I learned a hard lesson from you and Delta in the past... well, technologic, just Delta Neos. --iFredCat 22:01, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Nope, nothing has been explained. I have been unfairly blocked. If you want this to be considered finished, let the translators explain how can the "gold" pun in Stardust be ignored, and how come it's the same whether Stardust is used as an adjective or as a name, when it's not. Only I've been doing the explaining. Nobody else has. Blocking me over starting an argument is not how it works. The reason for my block was that I repetitively went against their localizations. I did, but only in arguments in Forums/Talk pages. And the case with Stardust still hasn't been resoled until my reasons are refuted (That Stardust is a name, and not an adjective; and that "karat" is essential for the pun). I'm not backing down unless any of the translators explain these points.

MadRest 22:02, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Nobody cares, man Neonian (talk • contribs) 22:04, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

What was explained is that you had a choice to either start working alongside the Organization - which means engaging in open dialog with them when you don't agree with some aspect of their work - instead of simply continuing to push your own translations on the wiki, or to be blocked. You continued with the exact same behavior, so you were blocked. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 22:05, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

And I'm saying, when?! Even right now, I'm asking for them to refute my reasons. On the Forum, I gave my reasons why I thought they were wrong. I'm not pushing my translations; it's just that when they offer an argument, it's usually, "The Organization did this, so it must be right." (You did exactly this when you inexplicably eliminated "Dragon" from the translated name.) Why don't they offer a solid counterargument against my points? How can Stardust retain the same meaning when used as an adjective in their localization and a name in the actual OCG name?! It's actually you who refuse to work with me by saying that I'm wrong without any rebuttal to my points. And it's not like I'm completely against them; I even think their usage of "Sub-Zero" for Sylphine is more accurate than "Cold". 63.141.199.214 (talk) 22:11, February 26, 2013 (UTC) MadRest 22:11, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Read the last paragraph. I outlined exactly what would be expected of you to avoid a block. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 22:16, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

And I'm saying, you have no reason to block me if I have a reason why their name isn't suitable. Also, see how you completely ignored the point I said about Stardust? This just proves that you are the ones who don't want to work as a team. You just completely ignore any of my reasons for the translations. Why don't you offer your opinion on my point? When Kahu said his point on "Radiance", I rebutted by saying that, "Yes, but there's also another pun in play here." Did I just go ahead and say, "No, you're wrong, and I won't explain why" (The same thing you're doing now). You are the ones pushing The Organization's translations; I'm just offering points on why some of them are wrong. If you reply with anything other than a rebuttal toward my Stardust points, then you're just proving that you're the ones not working together. MadRest 22:23, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Also, can you please refrain from blocking me until the conversation is over? We are in the middle of a discussion of a card's name; arguing about the name is no reason to be blocked. MadRest 22:25, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

There is no pun in that gold aura. That's the whole point. The character for that is not Carat per se. It's "Jewel" in its most vague sense if you break it down. The same definition as tama, or orb or jade or whatever you want to call it. There's a shitload of stuff like that. And Japanese/Chinese/Korean? Certain characters mean one thing but are reserved specifically for a name. That character in particular is NOT used in modern Japanese, is NOT used in modern Chinese, and is NOT used in modern Korean in a form of standard meaningful vocabulary. It is primarily used in names and titles as far as I know, and frankly carry about as much weight as Peter as a word for Rock. Furthermore, in this case were following the official manga translation precedent with Power Tool and Ancient Fairy. And Stardust Dragon is often just called "Stardust" as if it were its name in the animu and in the OCG sphere, as if its given name was Stardust, and its family name was Dragon. In that regard, Stardust Radiance Dragon is a perfectly fine translation. Not to mention Radiance can also be used to refer to glowing auras or perfection, both of which "Jewel" or "carat" or whatever as a character is used to indirectly refer to in old texts. The only one of the Duel Dragons that your argument could actually stand for is Ancient, and that's only because it's the only one that the mangaka copped out on and didn't give a seperate name instead of going Ancient Fairy(which is possibly due to a bit of a translation derp regarding Korea's card names but I'll get into that some other day). That having been said, there are a few derps on the wiki due to miscommunication that we have to iron out, but we're getting to it and our synchronization process isn't quite perfect yet. Calm down, do some more research if you want to counter us. Also, wiki guys don't block him for now until we straighten this thing out. Block him if both me and Earl say so, maybe but don't get too gung-ho. Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 22:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

I didn't address your point because I generally have no business discussing the finer points of translation. I can't speak to any issues you may have been discussing on card pages, because I don't follow card pages and so haven't seen any such discussion. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 22:36, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'd rather continue this on the card's Talk page, but thank you for actually having the guts to reply to my points, unlike the others. Anyway, that precedent only applies to the TCG. I agree that "karat" isn't all that important. Also there's "Enma Dragon - Red Demon" and "Beelze, King of Dark Dragons"; these cards all keep their names and aren't used as adjectives, so something like "Stardust, the Radiance Dragon" would be more true to the precedent, and it would actually be valid for the trans parameter too. But this should be on the Talk page.

@Dinoguy That's because there wasn't any discussion about this card; he just blocked me out of anger, and because he couldn't think of any counterargument to what I said. 22:43, February 26, 2013 (UTC) MadRest 22:43, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

To be blunt he was more blocking you because you were being a whining little kid and the org and wiki folks were busy with higher priorities and couldn't afford to put up with you. Choice of words has a drastic impact on how seriously and how in depth people take your word, and to be frank yours could use some work in the tone of voice. Your little episodes have been part of the reason for the lack of synchronization, broseph. <_<;; Also, Power Tool Mecha says hi. There's also the fact that Stardust Radiance Dragon could be read as Stardust=Name, Radiance Dragon = Middle + Family name similarly to the structure of the original Stardust, but you probably didn't consider that, did you. Random note, Middle and Family names actually used to denote someone's house, social background and status. It's valid. Drop it, stop being so literal, and stop screaming about differing opinions. And if you drop the org a memo on DGz or something we'll react faster. Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 22:51, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Senior D, just drop it please, and do it now. Before your warrant got tearing into million pieces and your licence become permanent revoked. --iFredCat 22:54, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but the whole card name isn't its name. There are a lot of cards which use the structure [title] [name] (or the inverse apposition), for example, "Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World". If you eliminate the comma, it doesn't retain the same meaning. Only "Radiance Dragon Stardust" can be spelled without a comma. And those are all reasons for an unfair, biased block. If I don't start swearing or insulting people in my arguments, my tone of voice (which you are hallucinating, since this is not IRL) is not a reason to be blocked. 204.93.60.71 (talk) 23:00, February 26, 2013 (UTC) MadRest 23:00, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

That's because he's the Lord of Dark World, not Dark World Dragon. "Stardust Radiance Dragon" is just whole different level of the member name. Would he be named "Stardust, the Radiance Gem Dragon"? Nope - I don't think so. --iFredCat 23:03, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

If you look at the OCG name, then it's the same as Grapha. Also, I don't have an account on DG, and I don't want to make one because The Organization deals with localizations, not translations. And consistency should be held in translations, a consistency that refers to the OCG, not the TCG. Only Mecha Dragon is that way, by the way, so why are you basing it on that one card? It is outnumbered by the other Duel Dragons and already-existing OCG cards which use the same title-name structure. I'm just talking about the trans parameter; I don't care if you use it for the unofficial English name. 204.93.60.71 (talk) 23:08, February 26, 2013 (UTC) MadRest 23:07, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Right. I've tried being nice. I've tried to be diplomatic, and it stops. Now. Master D is to be banned on sight in the future, from each account you ever edit from, unless you agree to follow our rules.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 23:13, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, that would settle on him for now. So you must be glad that I actually had some talk with Cheese in this discussion article before become more of butthead and butthurt all over the place. I respected what Cheesy said about "Stardust Radiance Dragon", as he said that both names are fanslations and that's our only choice to using is the latter, not former. But not only that, I also believed that the latter name suited that dragon better than the former due to the compare of puns. Yea, Jewel has no relates to the Dragon at all. At least I moved all images related to him into correct address as of now. --iFredCat 23:20, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

TwoTailed, I'd honestly refrain from being aggressive here. I'd rather not make enemies. And in regards to Duel Dragons. Ancient Faerie or whatever they did it as for the manga also says hi, to my knowledge. Also note that the manga goes wonky with its translations and we've only followed the latest precedent as it seemed to be the most stable one they were using based on Ancient and Power Tool. Void Ogre would be somewhat questionable, but that also seems to imply the TCG's going to go for X Y Dragon for its naming scheme. And your insistance that we only do localizations and that we don't actually translate, honestly feels overly aggresive, feels like you're trying to just get a fame niche of your own, and is why everybody is against you. At this point everybody feels like we're running around in circles, and that you're going to find something to nitpick regardless of what we do. Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 23:23, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

I get that impression because you don't discuss the translated names on DG, the Brotherhood of the Fire Fist only have their TCG names listed, and it is stated in Treasured Sword of the Seven Stars' note what its translation actually is. MadRest 23:27, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Also, you keep talking about the TCG, but I'm talking about the trans parameter. Don't get those confused! I'm okay with using your localizations, but the trans parameter follows the OCG name accurately to express the difference between the OCG and TCG. I just hope you're not getting those confused. MadRest 23:27, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

We discussed it a LOOOOOOONG time ago then Konmai TCG slapped us in the face. And for the purposes of the actual TCG, nobody actually gives a fuck about what it'd be literally(and even "literal" is subject to context that you honestly miss 90% of the time from what I can tell). The problem with going with OCG parameters is that the only languages where it'd be relevant are the ones that won't be using literal English translations. Korean and Chinese take the Han characters and majority of sayings just fine, and SE Asia is more English-speaking or wannabe Japanese when it comes to metagame discussions. Going with a 100% literal translation for English-speaking countries in OCG territories is only going to serve to confuse people, fuck up the metagame, whine more about "WHY THIS IS THE RIGHT NAME AND THE LOCALIZATIONS OR THIS ADAPTATION IS WRONG" and shit, and that can get problematic. Especially at Worlds. That's EXACTLY why we're avoiding it. Do note that we try to be literal + punny + referency for everything that DOESN'T have precedent. As for the Seven Star Sword I honestly have no idea what note you're referring to. I mean, it's a card that's literally based on an ancient sword called the Seven Star Sword, which can also be called the Jeweled/Treasured Sword of the Seven Stars or some other variation. Both names refer to the same object and both have been used in history and mythology texts to refer to the same sword to my knowledge. Seeing as how it's the exact same sword, we decided to follow the only remotely scholarly mainstream precedent we could find, and went with Seven Star Sword since English isn't a language that handles excessively fancy titles or long-winded direct translations of an SOV language well. I mean, if it wasn't a direct reference we'd probably be more literal but that's not the case here. Where the hell do you think all those Russia jokes come from. That having been said I'm personally perfectly fine with adding a "translated" bit under the phonetics like a good number of the pages have if you could like just ask us if there are any puns or bizarre interpretations you're missing through the wiki staff or something. We have at least one dude who actually knows how to interpret Han poetry and bizarre metaphors to some extent and could probably get you something a bit more literal that doesn't sound stupid in english Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 23:46, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

I'm assuming you're talking about the Shichiseiken (not sure). If so, then yes, it is based on that, but it doesn't translate into that. I'm talking about the note on your Lord of the Tachyon Galaxy page on DG. It is said that the name actually translates into Treasured Sword, and that should be in the trans parameter because it includes "treasure' in the kanji. Translating literally is only an issue for cards with puns. Stardust only has "senkou" as its pun, but I don't get how Stardust being used as an adjective plays into the pun. This is not localization; this is called an improvised translation, where you ignore the kanji, and translate the intended meaning. However, Stardust should be kept the same way, as a name, not an adjective. If you use it as an adjective, then that's a localization, which we will use, and I won't be against it. But, in the trans parameter, everything else should be the same, except for what's been localized. It is used to express differences between the TCG and OCG. Why should we use localizations for it, then?! That's all I ask. All in all, I'm fine with Radiance for an improvised translation, but Stardust is the monster's name. 198.144.116.76 (talk) 23:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC) MadRest

AAAAAAND this is where everybody else realizes we have a translated parameter in the card pages. Something that's been flying over a good chunk of our heads. Now we're getting somewhere. Excuse my current running around in circles, I've been awake for over 24 hours due to this mess and DN messes. In regards to that "translated" parameter? The last sentence. Our original gripe with the "Translated" stuff was that some of it was too literal to actually make sense by the standards of the source language. So how about we do this for a compromise. Keep the page name as whatever the Org does for improvisations so that it actually sounds like something the card would be in English. In the "Translated" parameter for the card pages, do a more literal translation that sticks to the characters, but figure out which kanji are used, how they're referencing each other and how they're used in standard linguistics, and try to figure out literal translations that are faithful to the characters, but more sensible than shit like "Fiend Roar Deity"(Because seriously, nobody in Japan understands it as that). Everybody else good with this? I'll kill you all if this ends up another shitstorm so please tell me I'm getting the gist of the problem right and have presented a proper solution. ;_; Kahunyu (talk • contribs) 00:18, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

To anyone interested, this conversation should be continued on Master D's talk page. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 02:14, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Anna

Hey cheesedude we are not perverts what about alexis, it has big chest and yet because anna is a little younger and she has a big chest it sounds wrong. Come on, She has a big chest and i need you to bar the person that interrupted my editing of zexal episode 91 and said yuma had all 5 exodia cards and won. That peed me off and it was seriously illegal with the context of this wiki.--David 40 (talk • contribs) 03:14, February 27, 2013 (UTC) david 40

Yes, they both have big chests. I do not see why we need to explicitly say that in the article space. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:34, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Gonna jet...?

So, y'know that "Kattobingu" was changed to "jet" in the English manga, right? In the summaries, I use to write "Kattobingu" linking to the page, but, I just noted on the summary of Rank 27, on the last paragraph, that it gets a bit contradictory to say "Kattobingu" in the summary with Yuma saying "Jet" in the file next to it... Should I start using "jet" instead or I keep using "Kattobingu"? :/ LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 23:52, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I would pipe it to "I'm gonna jet". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:27, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Should I replace it with "jet" in all manga articles as well (like character biographies)? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:04, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:07, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Continue Errors On Card Backings

As I been watching some Yu-Gi-Oh Zexal episodes and there are usually alot of scenes where the cards have the old card backings and I think some of the episodes should be review carefully to figure out which scenes have this mistake. 192.248.248.215 (talk) 04:19, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

But that means someone has to bear the burden of watching the dubbed episodes... in all their whiny glory... --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:21, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

What I mean Ultimate Kurbioh is the Japaneese Episodes not the dubbed episodes. 192.248.248.215 (talk) 04:59, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

If you do find those, by all means add them as errors. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:27, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Timelords

Dark Soul Taker keeps removing the Tag Force lores from the Timelord pages, and replacing them with an incomplete effect. Wasn't it consensus that we use the Tag Fore lores for the default lore of the card? MadRest 18:58, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Yes it was. I'll warn him. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:28, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Hey cheese :) is what he is doing right? I mean he adds stuff to Timelords the same as Metaion's last effect is that right? Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 19:32, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Then he must give us evidence for this am I right or wrong? :D Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 19:42, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Took a quick re-check of the effects in Tagforce 6, and the only incorrect thing is the "even if Face-downn" part). I'll go and remove those. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 19:50, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for cropping out the whitespace and how did you do it and i will continue to provide photos and you just clean up for me. It is a even even for us and did you bar that user i told you about. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 04:23, March 3, 2013 (UTC)david 40

Anna

Why you undo my edit about Anna. I compared their uniform cups and Anna's is bigger and when they write big chest on Alexis its fine. Go fix it man, put Anna has a big chest. No pervert or phedophile thing but trust me. I compared two girls who are the same age and body figure as Anna and one has a big chest and the other like Kotori's own so whats wrong. Think it out man and this message was to another user, it was just copied and pasted. He said something about the staff of the wiki so what is it. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 04:33, March 3, 2013 (UTC)david 40

I am not saying your edit was wrong, I'm saying it was unneeded. Yes, Anna's chest is bigger than Kotori's. We can see that from any pictures the wiki of them. There is no need to explicitly say that in the prose. There is no way to say it without having it sound unprofessional and perverted (regardless of whether or not it is or not). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 12:07, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Help?

Mind taking a look at ZEXAL episode 93? David 40 said that the Xyz Materials attached to the Chaos Xyz monsters are called "Chaos Overlay Units". Should we change them back to regular "Overlay Units" or keep them as is? Also, he even said that anyone who tries to change them back to regular "Overlay Units" will be banned. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 21:08, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

To answer that question, listen to 10:12 - 10:17, 14:33 - 14:40, 18:40 - 18:47 on this link http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xxxgv7_yu-gi-oh-zexal-ii-episode-93-raw_fun?search_algo=2#.UTPXa6KOSSo and i am serious about banning somebody for a while if they change it to Overlay units. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 23:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)David 40

Yeah, they do call them that for Chaos Xyzs. We should be calling them that too, I've simply forgotten. No, no one is getting banned over it either. It's a simple, honest mistake. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:43, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Cool; thanks. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 23:44, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

The reason i said someone was getting banned is because last sunday, some crazy editor/user wrote yuma had all five exodia cards and won and i didn't want a repeat of what might have occurred. Thank you for finalizing this and what does it take to be an admin and how did you edit so many things so fast. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 00:04, March 4, 2013 (UTC)david 40

Those are different cases. That case was clear vandalism, this was an honest mistake. Adminship is decided through our request for adminship page. Its recommended you have plenty of quality edits before trying. As for your other question, the simplest answer is "practice" and "far too much free time for my own good". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:11, March 4, 2013 (UTC)

I will continue adding photos and you can clean them up for me. No racist thing but i do not know how to clean up white spots or make the photo fully visible as i don't have a webcam. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 00:12, March 4, 2013 (UTC)david 40

You must have the files saved somewhere. Right click a file's icon and select "Open with", then select whatever version of Microsoft Office you have. From there, you should be able to crop out the whitespace using the "crop" button on the right sidebar. You don't need a webcam. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:16, March 4, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Hey

That's fine. There's always another day if necessary. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 01:18, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Move

So, I tried to move Number 66: Master Key Beetle per its Talk Page but "Number 66: Master Key Beetle" already exists as a redirect, so I can't move it. :/ Could you move it please? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 16:56, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll move it. But the translation should stay. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:13, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. But actually, as I (and Ark in NAC) said, the Kanji part and the Katakana part both are identically translated - "Master Key Beetle". It's not two different names, is the same case as Future Fusion and Fossil Fusion. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 17:44, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

I realize that it says the same thing twice. That's the point - that's what it says, so that's what our translation should say too. There's a reason we don't want to use it for the page names, but I don't really agree that we should remove the translation. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:52, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

In that case, we should leave it "Master Key Beetle - Master Key Beetle", like in "Future Fusion", instead of keeping 2 different names. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 19:03, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Mystic Revolution

Where is the "Lore Parameter" for this card?--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 18:51, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

On the card page. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:54, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

...where on the card page?--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 18:57, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

The card's effect. The main part of the page. It mentions "Mystic Baby Knight" and "Mystic Baby Magician". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:02, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yet it doesn't mention the fact that those aren't real cards.--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 19:03, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Isn't the fact that the links are not there enough of an indication that they don't exist? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

What? I just don't understand why you removed the trivia.--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 19:15, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Because its redundant. That info is already on the main card page and at List of unseen cards. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:20, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

But it isn't listed on the main card page.--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 19:25, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Does it need to be? Isn't it clear enough by not being linked? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:31, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

I think it would confuse people.--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 19:32, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

That's fair, but I don't think that confusion would result in them checking the trivia page. *shrugs*. Not really a big deal either way. Re-add it if you want. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:35, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 20:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Blue-Eyes White Dragon

Did this card appear in episode 22 of GX? The only card that appeared in Gerard's flashback was "Skyscraper". "Blue-Eyes" was in episode 21, but that was it. The flashback that showed Gerard defeated by Kaiba in episode 22 only showed "Skyscraper" as the Duel had already ended("Skyscraper" was being held by Gerard and he blamed his loss on that card).Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 03:48, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't Blue-Eyes shown as a silhouette? I know there was some implication that the Duelist Gerard lost to was Kaiba. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:49, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

In episode 21, it was the silhouette "Blue-Eyes". In episode 22, it appeared to be Kaiba's silhouette. If there was a specific flashback that showed "Blue-Eyes", then I know I missed something in the episode.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 04:57, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

I probably just confused the episodes, then. Go ahead and remove it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:06, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Episode 66 briefcase

I will need an image of the cards in Kaiba's briefcase in episode 66 for Card replacements in the dub page. There was a Cyber Jar and "Dark Hole" in the briefcase in place of "Graceful Charity" and a card I couldn't see due to the image not being clear.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 03:30, March 8, 2013 (UTC)

I would try asking WinterNightmare, then. I could get you those images, but I'm positive he will get you better ones that will let you identify the cards more easily. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:35, March 8, 2013 (UTC)

I just did now. The problem is I don't want to keep placing so many message requests on his talk page as he got very frustrated when he found me talking about almost a lot of things I couldn't find on two other occasions.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 03:42, March 8, 2013 (UTC)

If he doesn't get to it by the time I do my next "find images for the card replacements article" run, I'll try to get them (may try tomorrow, depending on how my day goes). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:43, March 8, 2013 (UTC)

Eyecatchers

Just wondering. The One Piece Wikia has an article for them. Should we make one as well or you think it's not enough relevant? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:03, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's relevant. Obviously, it should be organized by episode though. If we did make one, I assume each separate series would deserve its own page, with another page providing links to them. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 00:26, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to me, both of you. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:31, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think it'd need separate pages though, one page named "Eyecatchers" with sections for each series would be enough. I'll create it then. Just a doubt; in the One Piece Wikia, they say the characters who appear in each episode's eyecatcher in the episode's article. Should we do the same for GX? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:07, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Done. I just lack info on Toei's eyecatchers and screenshots of 5D's', DM's and GX's first set. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:27, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Also, just to be sure, 4kids doesn't use eyecatchers, right? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:42, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Barian mischef

The article Barian (Species) history section is not the correct history of Barians. That history is suited for Seven Barian Emperors. For that reason, I have went to write new history for that page. ---highly respect, Stark 02:34, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Help

I cropped out a photo but i don't know how to save the photo to upload it. Can you tell me how and the cropping has allowed me to update this wiki constituently if i know how to save the photo.--David 40 (talk • contribs) 02:59, March 10, 2013 (UTC)david 40

Once you've cropped it, just close out of the window. It should ask you if you want to save it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:05, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

I did but it doesn't have the correct file type to be saved. I mean it doesn't have png and others. Where do you find it. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 13:25, March 10, 2013 (UTC)david 40

I cropped with microsoft word but saving it is a problem. Can you help. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 23:49, March 10, 2013 (UTC)david 40

Oh, ok. What's the problem with saving it? Once its saved, you need to change the file type. Use Microsoft Paint. Drag the file to paint and hit "save as". This will let you re-save the image as any file type you want. If its a card image, you'll want to select png. If its another type of image, either png or jpeg are fine. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:59, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

3d bonds Beyond Time gameplay

I had the idea of creating this page since there were some things in the movie that appear to be due to exclusive rules for the anime, but each of the following are just in my opinion, so I want your opinion on this.

• A card that player uses will be sent to their Graveyard even if they are not the owner of that card.

• A Fusion Monster's Fusion Material Monsters aren't lost if they are removed from the field and summoned back to the field.

• Monsters from the Extra Deck can be summoned from the Graveyard even if they weren't summoned properly.

The strange thing was that "Malefic Paradox Dragon's" anime effect claimed it can summon a Synchro Monster from the Graveyard, ignoring the summoning conditions, suggesting Synchro Monsters need to be properly summoned before being summoned through anything else. UltimateKuriboh told me on my talk page that the effect of "Stardust Dragon" is the same in both anime and card game, but even then Yusei shouldn't have been able to revive "Stardust Dragon" as the monster was never properly summoned in the Duel.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 04:44, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

It's a matter of the term owner not being used to refer to game terms this time. Yusei owns "Stardust Dragon", but Paradox was its owner. The movie did ignore this. I'm not sure what you mean by the second point, can you elaborate? I think UK is right - in the anime/manga, monsters almost never adhere to the "monsters need to be properly Summoned clause". It happens often enough that I'm not sure it needs individual notations for it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:05, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

After "Elemental HERO Neos Knight" with "Malefic Claw Stream", Jaden brought it back via "Elemental Mirage". Later Jaden would use "De-Fusion" on "Neos Knight", but according to one of the notes in the 3D Bond Beyond Time page, that's impossible to do in the real game as the Fusion Material Monsters should have been lost after "Neos Knight" was revived via "Elemental Mirage". The Duel in the movie was also probably due to the Duel using Battle City Rules as this Duel occurred during Yugi's time era even though the Duel used cards from the first three anime series, but that's just a possibility(The thing about ownership with cards was a similar problem with "Monster Reborn" during Yami Yugi and Yami Marik's Duel as that card went to Yami Yugi's Graveyard when he used it even though that was Yami Marik's card. Later when Yami Marik used it, it correctly went to his Graveyard). Some of what have I seen in 5D's suggest that by that time, they have established that monsters from the Extra Deck can't be summoned unless they were properly summoned or through their correct summoning conditions ("Respect Synchron" was one notable example of this and "Malefic Paradox Dragon" was the other). On the other hand, the effect of "Stardust Dragon" was probably similar(slightly) to "Magical Scientist" within the anime in the sense that it could summon a Extra Deck monster without having to properly summon it.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 16:36, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Rank-Up

Actually, we do. It would be the same case as using "Rank Up" in past tense and in present participle, like we do on the Chaos Xyz anime lores. We have to abide by English rules; the Japanese just say the same thing in all of these cases. You can't use a hyphen when using a phrasal verb. First of all, it isn't even appropriate to use a card's name as a verb, but when you do, you still have to change it according to standard morphology. MadRest 19:22, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

sorry for not adding it right

sorry cheesedude for adding the pictures the wrong way im trying my best to add pictures for characters but hey as long as you guys Edit the pictures i add its ok their canon and show what is happing forgive my mistakes at least i provide pictures for The Wikia Sign 107Number Philip P.S my Name is Philip (107Number (talk • contribs) 01:30, March 13, 2013 (UTC))

Don't worry about it, but do try to be conscious of the double file extensions. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:47, March 13, 2013 (UTC)

Trivia

Why is Wagnike2 removing trivia like this? It explained what the kanji on the body of the monster was. It's not speculation. Wouldn't this fall under 'useful trivia'?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 17:57, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Join the chat; I also have an issue with that. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:00, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, bit of confusion on what the criteria was on staff's part. I've told him via chat PM, he'll stop (stop by chat if you can). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:00, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't ATM, I'm about to head out, but I'll ask the gist of it tomorrow or Saturday.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 18:02, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

New Post

Yo, long time no see. Wanted to talk to you about putting up a new post on here. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 00:14, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, then. Go ahead. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:22, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

But I want to be sure with you. I think we should give Yuma and the group who are going inside the Emperor's Key a name or something. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 00:28, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

I meant go ahead and tell me. Uh, what would we call them? Also, I think it would be best to wait until the next episode airs, since who knows, they may give the group an official name. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:38, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

The name could be unofficial until we're sure they'll get a name next episode, but if not then I can give them a fan name like someone did with the Martian Empire. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 00:41, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

What would you call them, then? I'm also not sure we need an article for it. We do definitely need an article for the airship itself though. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:43, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

How about the Crew of the Airship (Forgot what it's called) or something like that? Or maybe the Anti Barian Team? --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 00:47, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

I think it was "Different Dimension Airship" or some such in one of the previews. I'm not sure that its ever been named in-series yet. I don't really like either of those names, but I also don't have any better suggestions. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:55, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Then it's settled. Unless they actually get a canon name, or someone else come's up with a better one, they'll be known as the Anti Barain Team. I'll start up a post soon. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 00:57, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Next ZEXAL II?

Since we're getting a new OP/ED soon, what do you think we should call the subcategory for the ZEXAL II arc we're currently in for the Decklists? I was thinking something along the lines of "Barian Invasion"? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 23:54, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Barian Invasion sounds fine. Not having an official arc name is problematic, for sure. A few pages were using "Attack of the Barians" a while back and I hate how that sounds. "Invasion" works well though, I think. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:02, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

How about Barian Invasion Revealed since they had human hosts before entering the the human world. They are now invading and it is revealed so that shouldbe the name. Give a feedback. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 01:54, March 17, 2013 (UTC)David 40

That's really an unnecessary word, I think. Lots of things are revealed. The arc name should be quick and concise. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:57, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Cool then. I'll start changing it once the new arc begins ^^. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 10:25, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Vandaliser

This person is vandalising things.

Click here to block him now.

Some of his dirty works: 

• Pegasus's page

• new card's page

Link to his Contributions.

Please deal with him with extreme prejudice.

02:24, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Blocked. I'd usually issue a warning first, but most of that seemed pretty clear-cut. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:13, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Pic

Um... I've got 2 scans of BF Dragon's card, but I'm not sure which ones is the best... What do you think? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 23:39, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

I think the current one. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:21, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

Dunno where to put this pic. I have quite a few others of monsters that appeared in the Monster Cafe in episode 92. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 06:16, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Uh, beats the hell out of me. I don't know. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:14, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Droite

I uploaded an image when I edited them in, but I can't seem to find it. Maybe someone deleted it? It's when she declares an attack on Utopia with Photon Papilloperative in episode 38. I would take a screen shot, but getting a screenshot of something that happens that fast on a mac is extremely difficult to do.

EDIT: I managed to get a screenshot, but it's really low quality since RenRei00's videos have been removed from Dailymotion. Here it is: http://i.imgur.com/f6hFVDc.jpg TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 02:29, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah haha, I usually have a good eye for small detail like that. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 02:39, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

This was what you were looking for, Scarecrow. Can I delete it now? --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 17:33, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

We should crop it out and upload pics of both cards first, I think (which I intended to do and promptly forgot about). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:47, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Lets duel on DN

Yes I send you a challenge --195.254.135.180 (talk) 18:23, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Not on there right now. Feel free to add me on there and hit me up when I'm online (should be later today). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:27, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Unicorn Spear

Hey I'm not sure but it looks like Unicorn spear's page is broken for me. All the data is in there but when I opened the page I can't see the actual info; everything except "read more" and "facts about" is missing from the pageview. The actual data is in there, but I just can't see it. Is this a bug that only I have right now?

69.207.190.249 (talk) 16:22, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Its showing up for me. Not sure what the problem could be. If you see it on any other pages, let me know. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:31, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Ritual Technique

Well, it's important to keep consistency with generic words like "Kaiho", which means 'release.' Although they mean the same thing, I think it sounds better this way. But, I don't really care that much, though; if you change it, change the episode name, then purge the episode listing. MadRest 00:55, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

No, it doesn't have anything to do with Tributing. 'Kaiho' means 'release', and I think it's much too important to replace with a prefix; also, this way, it gives it a more nicer touch. MadRest 01:01, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

"Not something anyone would say"? That's what gives it poetic sense. We're not going to use colloquial simplifications at the expense of lingual accuracy. FYI, "to release a seal" is a commonly used phrase, at least in Japanese. "Unseal" implies a more domestic use, like unsealing a package. MadRest 01:13, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Translator

Yo, me again. I was hoping you could help translating a paragraph, if you can. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 05:06, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Nope, I can't read Japanese. Try contacting Ryusui, he should be able to help you. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:09, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 05:27, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Spoilers

Small thing, but many Wikias have a warning saying that the Wikia contains spoilers and stuff. It's not a big deal, but I think we should have one as well, since we do have all the possible spoilers 'bout all series, y'know. For example, if someone who is just starting ZEXAL II searches 'bout Shingetsu here, he'll immediately learn that he's actually the Barian who controlled Faker, which is revealed just, what, 20 episodes later. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 14:30, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Meh. Not really sure what to say. I don't really care about spoilers, I guess. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:36, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

But, unfortunately most of people do care. :P That's why they're called "spoilers" - 'cause they spoil the story for the person. Sure, as I said, it's not a big deal, but I think one warning wouldn't hurt. I myself, as an active Wikia editor, got spoiled many times as I edited/checked things on some articles. Now I've learned how to avoid that, but still, there are cases in which this isn't possible (like the Shingetsu/Vector example), and most of the people who browse through the Wikia may run into unwanted spoilers easily, mainly in character biographies and Deck listings (where the character's record is shown, which's where I got spoilers the most). LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:38, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that's likely to happen to any given person more than once. They'll have it happen and adapt to avoid it. That being said, I also have no objection to some sort of warning, probably on the main page. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:43, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Clumsy Kanky-kun here got spoiled more than once. xD Thing is, there are many ways of getting spoiled here, and again, the Shingetsu example, which got me too 'cause I took some time to download episode 96. :P

But if you agree with the warning, I can't say exactly where we should put it. The One Piece Wikia has in on the main Page, while the Reborn Wikia has in on the articles which contain spoiler. I find Reborn Wikia's method more effective, but at the same time it's really more laborious, mainly in a Wikia which covers 5 anime and 5 manga series like us. :/ So I guess the Main Page option would be better in the end. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 02:06, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Block

This user http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/User:XBrain130 needs a warning for deleting important content and replacing it with garbage. I saw pure incorrect facts which peed me off. Please take care of this. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 19:08, March 31, 2013 (UTC)david 40

I don't see any cases of that in his edit history. Specific links to him doing this? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:35, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!_ZEXAL_-_Episode_097?diff=prev&oldid=2399996 . I had already changed it back and he put back the same incorrect facts i took out. This is why i am peed off. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 20:04, March 31, 2013 (UTC)david 40

When a page is being edited by multiple people at the same time (very common for stuff that just aired), this sort of thing can happen. An edit conflict can cause things to disappear. I was also editing the page around the same time and lost a few things. Its doubtful it was an intentional thing and his past behavior doesn't indicate he would vandalize. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:36, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

Favor

Can you add the 2500 ATK anime only thing to the Junk Berserker page (tried in the preview, but I couldn't get it right)? Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:23, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Added (at least, I think this is what you meant). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:36, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks. By the way, could you change the the listing WRGP and Ark Cradle Wise? Going by the Japanese intros, the Road to destiny Arc only goes to 65-103, WRGP 104-129, and Ark Cradle 130-154? Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:24, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Zexal Episodes 97 and 98

The effect of Sargasso says special summon, cannot just be summon. No one can normal summon an Xyz, no one can Set an Xyz. It must be changed to special summoned and not just summoned cause if the Xyz is flipped, Sargasoo won't activate. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 02:52, April 3, 2013 (UTC)david 40

Looks like UltimateKuriboh fixed it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:59, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Jet!!, the revenge

So, remember that you instructed me of keeping "jet" instead of "kattobingu" in manga articles? Yu-Gi-Oh! D Team ZEXAL - Chapter 013's name is "Kattobingu da!!". It's a chapter name. Should I still adapt it to "jet"? It is probably never gonna be published in English, so I doubt we'll have an official English name, and I'm not sure if keeping "jet" as the "translated name from Japanese" is right, since it is a totally different adaptation and stuff... LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 23:58, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Just use whatever it says, then. D-Team is Japanese only. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:31, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Question

What should we do with the episodes on the WRGP page? The way it is now is rather inconsistent. If we're going by intros, all the information with 65-103 should be put on it's own Arc page (while mentioning Crashtown as a mini-Arc within the Arc). If we treated Crash town as a full Arc, that would be contradictery given it's taking place within the same Arc in a matter of speaking. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 03:39, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

I don't actually know anymore. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:46, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Image Size

Hey, is there a way to decrease image sizes on the wikia without having to use exterior means? The image of Duel Academy Sanctuary Aki I put on Aki's page is slightly large. Thanks. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 00:58, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean by exterior means? In the case you mentioned, moving the image up a few paragraphs should let it fit without any overlap, I think. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:14, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Using a website to re-size the image or something. And it's not just that, I was planning on putting a few other images in her outfit section, but that one is huge and takes up a lot of space. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:31, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Other than reducing the px size, no. Another solution would be add more text so there's more room. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:40, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

JPG and PNG

How do I replace a .png image with a .jpg image? --Ultimo Hana (talk • contribs) 02:53, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

You don't. You upload a new png version and add {{delete}} to the jpg version. An admin can delete the duplicate from there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:14, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Edit

I see the videos have been removed from the article. Perhaps an admin (like you) could visit the video list and see any videos that violate copyright. Energy X ∞ 19:00, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Went ahead and deleted those two. Thanks for reminding me. The rest of what's there looks fine - there aren't any issues with previews, advertisements or opening/ending themes. Actual episode clips like those two are far more nebulous. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:43, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, but what about language? Should only the videos in English stay or be removed (like this one)? Energy X ∞ 23:06, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Both languages should be fine. As long as we stick to what I mentioned above, there's no copyright issues. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:07, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

And lastly, fan videos (not sure this is a fan video...)? Energy X ∞ 23:10, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Looks fan-made to me. Deleted. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:12, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Removed the link because it is broken. That would be all and thank you for the advice. Energy X ∞ 23:13, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:14, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

DM loop

If you don't understand well about the gameplay or isn't interested in DM, then just ignore my message. Otherwise, would you drop by here if you had time? It's not a big deal, but I imagined you'd be a good help. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:36, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

I've never tried to understand that scene. I just know that it looked pretty cool, XD. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:42, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

It sure did. xD Right after I watched it, the possibility of understanding it never passed through my head. xD Goddamn confusing scene with awesome visual effects. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:52, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Song Lyrics

Hey. Do you by any chance know how to translate the lyrics for the opening/ending themes on an accurate online translator? --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 03:46, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Its doubtful any online translator would do that. Someone on NAC usually posts a translation of the opening/ending themes. I would look there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:10, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Just one question though: what the heck is NAC? --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 15:05, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. A forum called Neo Ark Cradle. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:29, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

No worries. How can I find it on here? --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 21:41, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:42, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

The forum I mean. --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 21:42, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Oh. There's a topic for the opening/ending themes in the ZEXAL anime section. If you mean the forum itself, here. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:51, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

I think I may have messed up a little while trying to update Rio's profile picture... --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 18:53, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

The image you used isn't as good as the one that was there, in my opinion. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:12, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

How is it not as good as the current image? --Firered16 SA (talk • contribs) 19:30, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

The end point of an infobox image is show a clear view of the subject's face. The previous image does that more effectively. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:04, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Joe =/= Harpie Lady

I think you're right, because he believed that they are similar due to the wings on their arms. Nothing more than just that because it's very common in all bird peoples. Let's say that Sky Scout is similar to Elemental HERO Avian because they have a pair of wings on their shoulder blades! (Nope!) --iFredCat 11:29, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Opening and Ending themes

I don't think we had agreed on something, just that we were going to be more specific on what to put in their Decklists (the Decks in SUN are a good example of why we should list stuff). Which Decklists has he been editing? Also I thought we decided that Barian Invasion was going to be the name for the first Barian arc until we get an official name? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 06:54, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

I think the monsters that were listed in his Deck from the opening were from when he's seen flying with several of them. And as for the 5th arc name, i'd think including something like battle or war in it would be more appropriate since it is essentially Barian's vs. Yuma and Astral to collect them in order to revive Don Thousand? Legendary Number War? Having more than 3 words makes the arc name seem really clunky. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 13:28, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Hunt doesn't really sound dramatic, especially for what will happen if Don Thousand does revive. What about "Battle"? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 14:15, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Translation

This was the reason why I switched to it "former" name instead of it "official" current name (which was already pasting on the article). Feel free to bring your big stick to him and talk him for that reason why you denied it. --iFredCat 14:29, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Nistro and Dextra

Nistro and Dextra will make their re-appearance in episode 103. I've taken the information from episodes 103 and 104 to write new info for their respective pages. If I add which episodes they appear in, would that be okay?

Auke1993 (talk • contribs) 15:31, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

No. Please don't add stuff until the episode airs. Episode previews have been wrong before. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:32, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

To add in an example for Cheesy; Have V even fought with Yuma when they were in that season yet? One opening showed that they did, but in episode, they didn't. --iFredCat 16:09, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Videos

Emmanuel mex has inserted a lot of videos, which are basically the same. making him (or maybe her) spamming. So, I think it is obvious the user needs a ban and the videos deleted. Energy X ∞ 10:00, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

I agreed with him, that user need a permanent ban. --iFredCat 11:36, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

No, let's not do that. Let's contact the user and ask them why they're doing that first. Let's see what their response is, I just asked them. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:52, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

He's right -

Yes, See all this discussion - at least he talked it out in the peace and we didn't fighting at each other (except at the beginning - I sounded little harsh). --iFredCat 22:48, April 19, 2013 (UTC)

Kaito name

I read the edit history, but you only said he's known as Kite in the dub, not the original version. Was there a scene in which the dub called Kite Kaito (I don't watch dubs so I don't know? Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 13:38, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

DM loop, part II

So, remember the discussion I opened in NAC 'bout this? We kinda are getting to a conclusion, so I just wanted to know if it'd be OK for me to re-write the loop's description and featured duel on the episode's article according to our deduction. And one more thing: if you check the thread, you'll see we concluded that the "fusion monster" Knight of Destiny is not actually a fusion monster, but just a visual representation of the powers of the 3 knights combined (just like, for example, "Lion Hope Ray" is not a new monster, but "Hope Ray" equipped with "Lion Arms"), otherwise, the combo would make no sense (and Yugi never said eh was fusing his 3 monsters with no Polymerization in the middle of the Battle Phase). Is it OK for me to re-write the Legendary Knights' lores and delete Knight of Destiny's article? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 16:56, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

Given that they have no written lores, yeah, that's fine. I'm not sure where we'd put the info on "Knight of Destiny" though. Leave that up for now. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:31, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

Awright. I left Knight of Destiny exactly as it is, and in the featured duel, instead of saying that the knights fuse, I said that "Once the ATK reaches "infinite", "Timaeus" absorbs it, forming "Knight of Destiny"". I removed the whole explanation in the featured duel, and left all the explanation only in the notes section (which I moved to below the duel instead of above). So, in the duel, instead of making the whole explanation twice, I just left the "Uses "Legendary Knight Hermos" and "Legendary Knight Critias" to Attack Dartz's "Divine Serpent", initiating a series of steps to increase the power of his attack to infinity." part, linking the second half of the sentence to the notes section. What do you think? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:49, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:54, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Druids

How is 'manipulation' a synonym for 'maneuverability?' Not to mention an official English source has already translated it as 'maneuver.' "Manipulating a situation," really? 31.11.101.253 (talk) 21:42, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Alternatively, I'd suggest something like 'stealthy,' 'sly,' 'covert,' 'undercover,' or 'furtive.' 31.11.101.253 (talk) 21:54, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I thought everybody already knew. I mean, you can check the block log, and it's completely obvious. Anyway, that IP's block has already expired before, so it's not block evasion. 209.73.151.71 (talk) 22:24, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Dude, he already sniped him down just before you posted that. --iFredCat 22:24, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Number Trivia meanings

There are only a few Numbers that don't have a Number meaning in the Trivia pages. I would have an idea with those, but I am trying to find a way to find significant trivia and place them in without them being deleted by other users(mostly UltimateKuriboh). These are the only Numbers that don't have a meaning: "Number 11: Big Eye", "Number 47: Nightmare Shark", and "Number 91: Thunder Spark Dragon". Is there any suggestions you can come up with for this?Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 01:31, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Not really. I've stayed away from the Number trivia. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 04:09, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Trivia

It just irks me to no end that this guy is just assuming we can take him seriously. Sure it may be his choice to stay nameless, but like I said, it just makes him look like he's trolling and just trying piss everyone off. And for the Trivia, how do we know what's fully intended by the card? We aren't the makers. Everything outside of actual stats, images, and appearance is speculation from anyone, even the stuff being kept. How do we really know 102 is named after an angel's halo, or that 44's number is a reference to the Levels needed to summon it. You ask me, you really want to end the editing war in trivia, you admins either delete the Trivia sections all together, or just let the public decide what references could be meant by the cards. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 17:45, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Look at the trivia for Number 44 and tell me that what's being fought over is not as likely to be true as what's already there? I admit there is a line, but that 50 guy is taking things just a little to far, and I think a lot of others agree with me. There are plenty of logical ideas for what a card's reference could be. I think a lot of us are smart enough to know what could be and what's speculation, but you as an admin do have a final say. If it makes sense, it should stay, but if it's repetitive, stupid, or just nonsense, it should go. Right? Well a lot of what 50 and others are deleting make as much sense to stay as what is kept. Since we may never know for sure, all we can do is make educated guesses. So like a said before, "either delete the Trivia sections all together, or just let the public decide what references could be meant by the cards" the the best and probably the only way anyone's going to come out of this. with more tempers flaring. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 18:00, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Technically, neither does an admin have higher authority in a discussion. And you're contradicting yourself. Neither of those were logical by any means. The card doesn't have anything to do with death because Mach is just a physical representation of this Number. Also, the bridge part has nothing reflexively in common with that card. Are you seriously trying to suggest that the creators were doing research on bridges and thought, "Let's name this card like this bridge that nobody remembers"? 50.117.80.77 (talk) 18:05, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Do you mind, this is a private conversation. But to answer your question, I doubt they would make cards, especially the Numbers without some kind of reference. Otherwise, the would be repetitive and redundant and the game would have ended a long time ago. I'm willing to bet when they start with an idea, they look deeper into that idea to see what they can use from it. As for Mach, if you watched the episode, you'd know Mach was a knight who rode a winged horse and they both were killed, but were than reborn as Number 44. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 18:11, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

So until then, we just fight amongst ourselves, then? If that's what you want fine, but I doubt this will end things. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 18:13, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Check out the talk page for 44. That Taylor guy's got the right idea. I know you guys want us to use the Talk page to solve things, but people, myself included, are not that smart. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 18:19, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Ushio contradiction

This was discussed a while back, but where would you propose to put the contradiction? I suggested the lead paragragh, however perhaps we could note it in the 5ds section. Problem, is I'm uncertain how (not sure how to make a movie work as a reference other then a giant name link). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 18:47, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Noting it in the 5D's section would be fine, and there's nothing wrong with using the movie as a reference in a giant name link, actually. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:12, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

5D's episode 100

When did "Wicked Rebirth" appear in this episode? I can't seem to find it there.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 22:58, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't it still equipped to "Stardust"? It could be that it was, but the card wasn't actually shown anymore. That does happen in Riding Duels sometimes. Its likely it was added because it was equipped to "Stardust". If it really wasn't there, then remove it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:12, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Sphere Field

Yes, in episode 82 it was said to be that after Barian's Sphere Cube was activated a red Sphere Field deployed. The Sphere Field then expands into a giant "energy ball". You can say from this content that Vetrix and Misael used was energy ball of miniature Sphere Fields and the giant energy ball is Sphere cubes and Dr. Faker's own.

Or it might be that we have separate page creating "Energy ball" and listing Sphere Field as one of them. In the end, the Sphere Field is a giant stimulated space energy ball in form of sphere. I want to mention out that you should create a "Teleportation system" listing Barians teleporting ability, Vetrix and his sons teleporting, and lastly the Different Dimension Airship teleportation.

---highly respect, Stark 20:26, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Yea, I see what you mean but might just be called "energy ball" and "Baria Teleport" ---highly respect, Stark 23:33, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Dark Storm Question.

Sorry if this is a late question. I've already sent this evidence to UltimateKuriboh, but hasnt been online to check his messages,so i decided to send this to you. Number C96: Dark Storm--I'm 100% sure it is a rank 3. If you look at the trailer for episode 102, Dark Mist (the character) uses Barian's Force on his monster form. It glows red, like all Barian Chaos Zys do, and descends towards the sky. According to the anime effect of Barian's Force on the wiki, it says, "Target 1 face-up Xyz Monster you control; Special Summon from your Extra Deck, 1 "Chaos" monster with the same Type as that monster you control but 1 Rank higher, by using it as the Xyz Material."

Sorry if this was already looked into. The video: 300px --— Gamefreak776 (talk) 21:48, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

It probably is a Rank 3, but its still speculation. The episode airs in a few hours. Just hold off until then. Its also worth nothing that "Number 96" is a base number not an Over-Hundred. The two previous examples ended up the same Rank as their preceddesors. Black Mist having both the monster and Rank Up doesn't mean he'll use the Rank-Up on that card. He could use it on "Judge Buster" instead and Summon two Chaos Numbers. Not saying that will happen, but the point is that its all speculation. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:58, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Number 69

I am debating through through the effort of undoing the rename to Number 69 due to the fact the person that went through with making it Coat of Arms did not provide any actual proof that it is supposed to be Coat of Arms. Is it worth going through, or just leave the possibly mistaken name up until we get something else to prove it once and for all beyond the image I linked on the talk page. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 02:10, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Since posting this notice about the potential need to reverse a rename, Number 69 has been renamed for a second time, once again to something that is not backed by what is shown in: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aakK6uiWqKY/UYLR2tEphRI/AAAAAAAABaA/uEcovDftjqU/s1600/39acd5dbfa3fe7987f6d576700ff413c.jpg As I can not rename the page back to Heraldic Emblem as supported by the link, I have to leave this up to an admin to settle since this appears to be ready to turn into an edit war. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 03:34, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Until we have an actual source that says the English name (which should come fairly soon), I'm inclined to leave it as it is. My time is short on the weekends and I must go soon, and I don't want to spend the little time I have on the wiki today moving that article again. If you wish to contact another admin instead, that would be fine as well. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

I thought to bring it up because the previous edits were without any source at all and the provided link does suggest that the name is Heraldic Emblem. Along with Number 8's name and the rest of the archetype being Heraldic Beast also implying that the name should be Heraldic at the very least. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 17:50, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I'm back for the day. Seems its been moved again. A source was provided this time, but the link is dead. I'm looking into now and trying to find a source somewhere. As for your other comment, check the card's talk page, I've answered that part there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:27, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

I just took a look to the source posted, which just happened to be Shriek listing the card in the English spoiler without an image of the card. I've been hesitant to use that as a source for renames on the Dragon Rulers because they either could just be pulling names out, or taking them from the wikia as I have seen them called out for doing before. For the time being I put the rename template up on the page in the off chance that the name doesnt change from its Spanish > English translation and left it at that. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:37, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not a fan of Shriek myself. The rename template should be fine for now. If it gets moved again without a source, I'm locking it down. Anyway, thank you for doing what you've done. You went about this right way for sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:41, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

It beat the throwdowns I had over Hope Ray V/Victory. Also helps that this is a case where I feel like I'm in the right and can back up why I am for that matter. Either way, I'm already out of the options that I could through on my own so it has to be up to the staff at this point to put an end to the rename battle going on. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:52, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Number 69

Here's the link to Number 69's TCG confirmed name: clicky --Yes, it's PSYCHID! ^{He talks! He does stuff!} 22:06, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

That really isnt a source. For all we know, Shriek took the name from the wikia and they do not actually know. This is why I have put the rename template in place on Number 69's page so that it can be handled by staff - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 22:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Also to address the issue of using Shriek as a source, they also have the little Dragon Ruler's named in that spoiler for the TCG set. Yet no one here has renamed those respective pages because they doubt the authenticity of the translations/localizations for their names. They may be accurate at reporting events, but they are not very good at translating anything for themselves. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 19:25, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Confused IP-Addressed User

It sound like he was not Master D, but I have nothing to against with that. So feel free to extending the situation to him of why he was blocking. And yes, I know that he can playing a trick, making himself as if he was another person. If you don't like how he act, lock the edits on him further to prevent him from making himself a joker. --iFredCat 13:44, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

My Wikia App

Hello. My name is Nic and I'm from the Community Development Team. As you may or may not have heard, we recently released an application called My Wikia. We are hoping to bring this app to the attention of more people and for this reason could use some cooperation with this Wiki. We are hoping that you will allow us to display this Template in the upper-right hand column on your wiki. If you are fine with us displaying this, please let me know. Thanks. - Wagnike2 (talk • contribs) 14:10, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

I've mentioned it to some other admins. I'll let you know as soon as I can. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

It seems fine. Feel free to put it up. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:05, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Overlay Network

You should take a look at Overlay Network article. It explains the portal which Vetrix and Barian race use to teleport. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 00:33, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

If you look at Overlay Network close and what it for. You can impale that it is portal used to travel through dimensions such as Xyz Monsters used it to come to earth. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 01:39, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

From my observation, I think they do resemble to Xyz summoning. As you go inside the Overlay Network portal, it look like The card frame of Xyz Monsters which stylized by having it appear as if one is flying through space with many stars in the frame giving the appearance of one streaking by them and other stars appearing stationary due to relative distance. Similar to the Photo where Vector is travel through dimensions. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:01, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

I guess so. We should wait for few more episodes because they might explain more about portals used by the Barians and Different Dimension Airship. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:07, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

Vandal

I take it you handled the precautions regarding our latest vandal, right?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 18:46, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

(Transferred by iFredCat 19:42, May 11, 2013 (UTC))

Yeah, he's blocked. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:45, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry to be a bother. I was afraid I posted this conversation under the wrong cathegory. If so, I appologize.--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 21:09, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

No worry - you just posted it in wrong article after all, lucky that I was really nice to help you out by place your comment in here instead. Just like your Talk Page, be sure to be careful when you're going to post in the comment. And if you're using Monobook skin, it will be known as "Discussion" next to the "User Page", like I am using right now. --iFredCat 22:29, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Aye, I sure messed up that. Gomen. --Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 22:32, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Battle Ox

So, any more comments on Talk:Battle Ox (character)? I got no more reply. :/ LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

I've been busy, sorry. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:13, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Nah, don't worry. Thanks for replying. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:42, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Dexter 98 reference

Can you fix this? I've been trying but I don't know why it's still not displaying (I've been in the preview 5 times over trying to figure out what's up). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:49, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Dexter's Laboratory or Dexter from Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's? --iFredCat 22:51, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Where am I supposed to be looking, Shard? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:01, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Here. For some reason the episode 98 reference won't display, and if I try to remove it, the next reference is affected the same way. (edit) 'face-palm that I didn't see that'. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:14, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Number 74

I'm pretty sure you've had it with this by now, but may I hear your reasons for it once again?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:10, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

He means the trivia talk page of Number 74. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Accidental rv

Sorry for the recent revert, accidently hit Rollback when I was actually only trying to click diff. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

No big deal (I do that at least once a month myself). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:52, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

GX is part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season!

I swore to Sophia, that user is one stubborn user, he just kept revert his own edit back to what he believed. I had to revert it back to the way you thought it was right. Wouldn't it's time to lock up the article for a day or two, OR go ahead and slap some sense in that IP-Addressed User? --iFredCat 01:23, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No, because he offered a perfectly reasonable explanation for the revert. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:26, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Well, though they are using the same structure (Yu-Gi-Oh! cards and game ideas), they are still separate show. I am aware that Yugi made his appearance more than his rival (Seto) but that's not enough to making GX become part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season. I would say same for 5D's and ZEXAL, though Dark Magician Girl, statue monsters, etc. are all common appearance through all shows. I would be damned if he put in some more logical thought of why GX is same as Second Season, they are stay separate. --iFredCat 01:29, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

I never said they were the same show (nor did the IP), I said the IP's reasons were valid because the articles are structured like that. If you care that much, I suggest you go fix them in the all the other articles, then revert the IP's edit. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:33, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

He didn't "undoing" my edit as of lately. And that article is only one he vandalism'd on. --iFredCat 01:35, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Fred. Go read his last edit summary. Then read my last post again. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:47, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, my dear coffee guy, if you still disagreed, just go and revert it - I usually left all edits from my friends (yes, included you) alone. --iFredCat 03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure you're understanding me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

*poking your shoulder* --iFredCat 03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Addition to the Index Page

Would it be alright if you added Forum:Weekly Deck Competition to the list of blue links on the Forum:Index page? All the other forums have a link that lets users go to the forum they need, but the WDC Forum doesn't, I think it might be a way to advertise the contest to new users. Just a thought. Also, Cheesedude, if you're not the person to ask, who should I ask? --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 02:59, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I'll add it now. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:01, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 03:03, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Let me know if the text I used for the pipe needs to be changed. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

No, I like the text. But, could you add in to before show off? That way it makes sense with the first part of the question proposed, Do you want.... --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that might help. Done. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Images

Hey Cheesedude. Jx900 has uploaded many fan-made images which are really of no benefit to the wiki. I'm speaking to him in the chatroom now and it is all in good faith; it isn't 'vandalism' as such. The images are of cards, but are fan-made versions. 'Mind having a look?. Thanks, --Spongebob456 ^Talk 18:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Yea, anime pictures, Bob456... He would have a serious stack cut off his job. If he still don't listen, a week of ban would deal with him. --iFredCat 19:14, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, he's stopped uploading them after I told him the issue. It's all out of good faith; a block isn't necessary. --Spongebob456 ^Talk 19:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, it must hit him like a truck would stopping on the dime. --iFredCat 19:58, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Ruling Vandalism?

*thumbed over the shoulder, at GrouchMan's Profile* Ain't that forbidden to have artwork of Characters in the User's Page? --iFredCat 21:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

It is? I wasn't aware of thet. Why is it forbidden?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:03, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Copyright violation. Fair use covers the article space, not the user space. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

RE:User page

Oh sure, Cheesedude, sorry about that. -- GrouchMan (My trash can) 22:48, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Artwork page guidelines

Right, I'm shocked this is even an issue, but some people seem to think that cards have genders, so it has become one. I have two points.

• It made perfect sense to begin changing cards from, for example, "The artwork of "Foolish Burial" was edited to... [description of change]" to "This card's artwork was edited to... [description of change]" because the name of the card is obvious. The card name is listed on the page already, why do we need to repeat ourselves? This is something Fred doesn't seem to understand, and although it's logical, a lot of users still use the former way.
• The use of "her" to describe cards. Cards do not have genders. The monsters depicted in the artwork have genders, but in artwork pages, we are referring to the artwork itself, not the monster. I'm not completely against using "her", because it can be awkward to describe artwork changes otherwise, and because it's such a tiny thing blown out of proportion by one disillusioned user, but a more professional sounding alternative would be preferable.

My point is, can we have a draft of Artwork guidelines now that we've finally finished dealing with Trivia guidelines, with a sample of how the card artwork pages should be worded?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Along with Joey's own comment, I would like to suggest you to read all lines that other articles had before this issue was hit the fan and shattered all over here now. I meant, why bother deal the theory on Elfobia if there are already many other girls' articles had those lines in that way? --iFredCat 19:10, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that is exactly the current standard that I feel should be reviewed.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:15, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, we should probably make an artwork policy page. I can try to make a draft tonight. As for the issue at hand, UK suggested using "this monster instead of "this card". That should satisfy both parties. The wording is a problem though. You're right that its like that on all the pages and it shouldn't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:27, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Voice actors

I'm just curious, where do you guys get your information on who voices who in the English dub? ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:40, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

I assume its from episode credits, but I'm not actually sure. I haven't dealt with any voice actor edits. I would ask Golden Key. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:45, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, anyway. I'll go ahead and ask him. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:46, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Convert Ghost

In the anime does the text actually say it is re-set like the Games? If so then I can add in 78 in Mistake section that Lester did not mention it was re-set. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:43, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

The transcribed Japanese anime lore in the article does mention that. Whether that text is the same as the text in the card image I can't be sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:46, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Sebek's Blessing

I'm not sure how to edit the card templates so I'll leave you a message and ask if you could do this for me. The mentioned card has an altered effect in the anime, where it works with any battle damage inflicted, not just direct attacks. It is used in this manner in three episodes so it isn't just a one-time error either. Drake Clawfang (talk • contribs) 09:55, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Added. In this case, an "animelore" parameter just needed to be added with the right text. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:38, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Merag and Nasch Identities

In the History Page of Seven Barian Emperors, you said this: "Can't wait for people to start adding pictures of Shark and Rio to the human form columns for Nasch and Merag though."

I can't help but wonder what with Tenjo = Merag while Kamashiro = Nasch ?!? 141.0.9.59 (talk) 14:08, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not seeing any implications that Kite is Merag. If you look at the Numbers map that Heartland shows, two of the ruins are at the bottom of the ocean. They have to be Nasch's and Merag's. Nasch looks like Shark. Shark can use Chaos Numbers for no known reason and Rio can sense Barians. So I'm pretty sure Shark is Nasch and Merag is Rio. That said, its not confirmed, so it shouldn't be added to the article until it is, which is why I said I couldn't wait for people to start adding it - it shouldn't be added yet, so it would need be reverted. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:31, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Following Cheesy's comment, you need a source to prove that Shark and Rio are them and you need an frame to show them transformed. Otherwise, you are just a foolish storyteller. --iFredCat 16:41, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Hey guys, i was wanting to talk about Nasch and Merag's identities as well. i was like looking at the page wondering why have people already put up the pictures of shark and rio when nothing has really revealed if the two were really nasch and merag. yeah true shark looks like nasch but that isn't confirmed, so we should delete their pics until next week's episode when we know exactly what is going on. but i jut can't help wondering what if my favorite Shark and Rio are really Barians, if so they should just side with Yuma and continue to help them. oh another thing what i find interesting was that, the Kastle twins are like the opposites of the rest of the Barian Emperors; how the Kastle twins don't remember their past lives as Barians and the 7 Emperors don't remember their past lives as humans. well, we'll see about next week. Rubi1998 (talk • contribs) 13:04, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Its not confirmed that they are Nasch and Merag. However, it IS confirmed that both Shark and Rio had past lives. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:10, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

However, Past Shark was showing to wielding Barian symbol on his chest and they are in the royal family (Shark being prince and Rio being princess). Therefore, Emperor can't be King/Queen unless they have royal blood, like them. --iFredCat 17:15, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

They don't all have to have been rulers in their past lives. Mizael was just a dragon tamer and Durbe was a knight. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:17, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Yea, that's an idea. Emperors are just little lower than King/Queen, to be honest. Treat them like chess pieces. --iFredCat 17:19, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Chaos End Ruler

He believed that since "Chaos End Ruler -Ruler of the Beginning and the End-" was following other "Envoy" monsters in the effect and summon condition therefore he thought that would be a-okay to renaming the broken card into "Envoy of the Beginning and the End" instead. But I agreed with you about the name thingy - it should stay in that way anyways. --iFredCat 16:39, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

ZEXAL episode 107 summary

Sorry for asking, but would you mind expanding the summary of Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 107? It feels...kind of bare. I'm asking this because I've seen how well you've written out the summaries of past ZEXAL eps. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 07:17, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Its on my list, yeah. Doing the summaries the way I've done in the past is very time-intensive. I try to do some when I feel I take it, but it can take up to three hours, all told (sort of burned myself out doing the entirety of the WDC finals arc). I plan to go back and do 101 before anything else. I don't mind the bare summaries, what I do mind is the image spam. You can't have all those images if there's not enough text to support them. Also, I use bobo from NAC's scripts as a base to write them, so I can't start on 107 until that gets posted. And don't apologize for asking, its nice to know which episodes people are most interested in seeing expanded. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:59, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

A'ight, that's good to know; thanks. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 16:59, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Ride 30

Nope, it doesn't appear. Gonna remove it. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 15:46, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comment

Hello, Cheesedude. You have new messages at FredCat100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--iFredCat 20:55, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Question

Can this be considered spam? He's made several posts like that, and even though we tell him we have no affiliation to Konami, he still posts them up. Plus there's stuff like this. Just wondering. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 18:41, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, its spam. I'm gonna delete both threads and leave him a message. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:46, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

31.11.101.253

Whoa, calm down - he did made a good suggest for some card's names. And some of them are making sense; like "Purple" was such to be in the place before the Dragon but after the name, like "Pyrallis, the Blazing Purple Dragon" instead of "Purple Dragon FlameThrower". I respect him for that reason. So if you still disagreed, may you explain what's on your thought of him being a "bastard" for all those renaming? --iFredCat 19:57, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Its Master D. He should be banned on-sight for ban evasion, if nothing else. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:06, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

It's not ban evasion, lol :) - that account's ban ran out, and I had every right to start using it. 109.163.239.214 (talk) 23:08, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Well, congratulation, you had failed to prevent him from moved "Divine Dragoon Knight Felgrand" into "Felgrand the Divine Dragon Knight". That was also provided by Master D (109.163.239.214). --iFredCat 23:10, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

No, you don't. You're ban evading. Your original account is infinitely banned. Any all edits from you are ban evasion, period. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:11, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Well, there is no harm in that. The original ban was for invalid reasons, and besides, it's not like I'm vandalizing stuff. You people take things way too seriously. 109.163.239.214 (talk) 23:13, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, your "Master D" account is locked and I only can "view source" on it, not edit it. You're still ban even to-day. --iFredCat 23:18, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

New hardhead

Oh dear, 222.124.130.204 (AKA Master D) has escaped other banlist, and is heavily reverting "Ancient Fairy Dragon" article all because of "Ancient" being adjective instead of noun. Care to block him, or if you don't think so; protecting that article further to preventing IP-Addressed Users to be able to editing it? --iFredCat 02:41, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you already agreed that Jewel Flare Dragon Stardust (or Stardust Radiance Dragon at the time) was not the same thing as "Radiance Dragon - Stardust" months ago. Therefore, you cannot just change this one. Ancient Fairy Dragon and Fairy Dragon - Ancient are not the same thing. You could also use Ancient, the Fairy Dragon if you'd like, but that is still not the same thing as Ancient Fairy Dragon. 85.135.52.30 (talk) 02:45, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Mewback MKFWEF

Hello, Cheesedude. You have new messages at FredCat100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 03:25, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

5ds 150

Next time could you put your thoughts on the talk page before you make the change? While I agree things like that are expected in an anime, that doesn't mean it's still not a mistake (a human being cannot just breath in space). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:30, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Reasons?

I believed that he thought it's better to call him "Shark" rather than full name and it was not Rio who dueled Shark at all, it was Abyss, but yes - they still have to be naming there anyways. --iFredCat 01:44, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

Reply

Here is the proof, the user inserted the link. The Numbers have been named differently because of it. Energy X ∞ 19:48, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Fonda

SALUTATIONS, CHEESEDUDE!! (It's actually me, ArcadiasScholarly, albeit in hurry hurry rush rush IP mode!! ;j)

When I attempted to make a separate page for Fonda's Decks and save the moved Deck specs, I got an "error" saying that the page already exists. I then put "Fonda Fontaine's Decks" (the intended page title) in the search box and when I found the said link and clicked, I noticed it took me to Fonda's page, yet automatically scrolled me down to her Deck specs.

That's when it hit me--I remember trying to do this before (i.e. also with Jasmine, Mindy, Tania, etc.) but Aged Goblin not only reverted everything but also rather than at least DELETING the pages, he must of somehow done something that links the "pages" I made right to the character's Deck sections ON THE CHARACTER'S PAGES INSTEAD OF DELETING THEM. So in other words, since those "pages" I made re-direct to those said areas in reality BUT ALSO since they still technically exist on the Wiki, I can't create a new page with those "sensible" titles (i.e Jasmine's Decks, which sounds aesthetically in-sync with Yuma Tsukumo's Decks.)

You can either reply to me via my IP address or mah registered username (although if this "new policy" that'll axe unregistereds will make them non-existent here, methinks you should best reply to the latter.) I simply ask if this can be fixed (as in, can these "nonsensical section re-directs" be made into distinctive pages again??) You kinda get where Imma coming from here? =? --68.82.237.254 (talk) 20:14, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

KC - Kaiba's Corp

Well, I thought KaibaCorp always invents Dueling products like the Duel Disks, the Duel Runners and the Duel things in the first season

Larry1996 (talk • contribs) 21:49, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Not all Kaibacrop can do - Yusei made two motorcycles and 3 (viewed) Duel Disks from scratches. And he's not an employee of KC yet. If he can do that, then anyone in Yu-Gi-Oh! universe can do the same; even Astral/Number 96 as well. --iFredCat 22:12, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, KaibaCorp did make Duel Disks. I don't know that they ever revealed where mass-produced Duel Runners came from though. It's not that what you wrote isn't true, its that what you wrote isn't adding anything to the article. There's been no mention of who makes D-Pads and D-Gazers. We don't need to mention that has been no mention.

Fred, I'd like to request you don't respond to things on my talk page unless you have an actual answer. I don't mind someone else answering for me, but that's not what you've been doing either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:54, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Aii, Cheesy. At least I saved you a trouble of cracking an article into two... --iFredCat 00:06, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Goblin's gone done it again!!

SALUTATIONS ONCE AGAIN, CHEESEDUDE!!

Goblin's gone done it again--doing Deck re-directs for Roman Goodwin, Devack, Chumley Huffington, Sarina and Pierre the Gambler. (JUST gots done un-doin them!) Could u please try 2 talk to him about what's been "agreed" on regarding the larger characters' Deck sections? --68.82.237.254 (talk) 14:35, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Don Thousand

I know I was just wanting to put the most recent picture of Don Thousand on there , I would add more to the history except I don't know what he said cause right now I can only get the RAW episodes Sorry for the inconvenience

THe LiGhT oF DeStrUCtiOn (talk • contribs) 00:14, July 1, 2013 (UTC)Bill24601

RE:D Team ZEXAL

Oh, sure, I don't really mind. It's usually me who does that 'cause I'm usually the first to do so, but it's not like I was the one in charge of doing that. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:41, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, thanks then. If you need help with some stuff, like the chapter's Japanese name or something, just ask away. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:46, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Haha, we were ninja'd. Will you create Naitou's article as well? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:50, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yessir! BTW, remember that in Japanese, surname comes first, and that usually the chōonpu "ou" is adapted to just "o" in English, like with Katsuya Jonouchi, Kyoji Yagumo, etc.; it should be "Kento Naito" instead of "Naitou Kento". ;) I already renamed it and stuff. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 16:50, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Ark's quite Japanese-ish, actually. xD He keeps names in Japanese order, uses Japanese romajizations like "jyo" and "ryuu" instead of the adaptations "jo" and "ryū", etc. I admit that in the last case, writing one more latter in more practical then writing the chōonpu mark, though. :3 LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 17:04, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Kento's D-Gazer

I couldn't find a shot which showed completely his D-Gazer; just one which showed the frontal view and one which showed the lateral view. Which one do you think it's better for the Duel Gazer gallery? I personally find both the frontal and lateral parts quite unique, compared to the standard models. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:05, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Awright. I'll mix both into one file then. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 18:11, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Sealed Form of Chaos Numbers

Could you look on the talk page of Number C as I have left a message referring tot he sealed form of a Number C? This is important as it can be beneficial to the article's purpose. --David 40 (talk • contribs) 18:59, July 7, 2013 (UTC)david_40

Vandal

Ban the user Qcgadmin as he isn't listening to you and is still violating the wikia policy. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 21:37, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Already done. Thank you, though. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:46, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Image Deletion

Hey ^^, am I allowed to delete images, or is it something only mods/admins can do? Just wondering because I have a mac which doesn't screencap into .jpgs (it automatically generates them as .pngs and won't change them), so I can't replace some of the .jpg images. Plus, I think I read somewhere the .pngs are preferred anyway? Thanks! TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:11, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that's admin only. And yes, pngs are preferred. If you can't replace the jpg images, just upload the pngs and mark the jpgs for deletion (assuming the quality is the same or better, of course. A good jpg is preferred to be bad png). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:30, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Ah cool, thanks ^^. Just wondering because my macs a lot more powerful than my old computer, so I can take higher quality images without lag. Thanks again! TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:41, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Images

http://www.ka-nabell.com/ If you want to search for an OCG image, you'll have to use the Japanese name. Also, I use http://image.online-convert.com/convert-to-png to enhance them; that's why they're of a little bit higher quality, and you have to crop them in Paint 'cause they have a large white border around them, after they're already converted. Aberration (talk • contribs) 15:18, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Numbers

Hey just giving you heads up this user called RikuHalliwell1990 is making dramatic edits to the Numbers pages, replacing every single "number" (the flashing colorful numerals that appear on the screen when one is summoned) with an image of his make. At least six of them are photoshops, and judging by all those images being on his front page, he's not stopping till 107. Just to let you know. Aeron Solo wuz here (If you wanna talk) 12:16, July 20, 2013 (UTC)