User talk:Dinoguy1000/Archive/2013/04

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Not sure...

...if that's just coincidence or that's just this way - "Number 56: Gold Rat" = Longest Name Card in Magic that resembled Gold Rat --iFredCat 16:38, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Heh, I've seen that M:TG card (not in real life, unfortunately). That set has a bunch of completely off-kilter cards (which, given the nature of the set, should be absolutely no surprise whatsoever). =D ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:42, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Same, those Unhinged sets were just full of funny stuffs, which was released way before Gold Rat was created. --iFredCat 16:44, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to know how the set was released; I've got some friends who are into M:TG who would doubtless turn green with envy if they were to find out I had cards from it. XD ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:46, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
It's been out for a while, right now it's just Magic 2013 releasing and I am collecting half of them right now. As well as Gatecrash. --iFredCat 16:52, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Found it - It's cheaper than you thought. --iFredCat 16:55, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Heh, still outside my current budget. =D ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:57, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, travel bill making it difficult, eh? --iFredCat 23:54, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Nope, just unemployment. =/ ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:15, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
I am been unemployment for year, I quit my last job because they forced me to do where I don't like to do. At least I am still able to affording "Shooting Quasar Dragon", which just arrived now. --iFredCat 01:56, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

No, you're welcome. --The Goblin 12:15, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Custom Cards

Was there a change in policy? Or is this just a thing that you've finally gotten around to doing? Just curious. Lord Grammaticus (talkcontribs) 00:47, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

There is no policy, really, it's just something I finally got around to doing. Custom cards really don't have a place on this wiki; they should instead be posted to YCM. We don't support them, and all they serve to do here is clutter up some of the Special:SpecialPages reports. When I remove custom cards, I only blank them, in the event the creator or someone else wants to salvage the card(s). ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:50, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, alright. Thank you. Lord Grammaticus (talkcontribs) 02:02, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Template help; different matter

Don't know if I did something wrong, or whether or not the template is not adapted for 5D's. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 04:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

You missed some closing brackets. ;) ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:28, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

about "Extra Pack: Sword of Knights"

How come "we don't link to Shriek any more" or even sites, just curious to know. and most of info come from those sites b4 others so far as I know of.--Wasn't 23:44, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Because they don't specify their sources, they use horrible translations, and because we have better, faster, and more accurate sources now (specifically Ark from NeoArkCradle). ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:41, April 9, 2013 (UTC)


I'm sure that if an archetype is mentioned in a cards text, it is deemed support, whether or not it has a positive outcome on its user? TheScarecrow14 (talkcontribs) 08:12, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Nope. If a card effect is clearly harmful to an archetype (e.g. by preventing cards of that archetype being played), it's tagged as anti-support. Unfortunately, the way the whole thing is currently designed means that cards tagged as archetype anti-support won't display a relevant archetype navbox unless they are also tagged as a member, support, or a related card; since "Goblin Pothole Squad" is neither a member or support, the only option left is related. Fortunately, the card article redesign will address this with an explicit "anti-supports_archetypes" parameter. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 08:18, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

New Article!

Feel free to give me either advice or tip of how to writing a better grammar. --iFredCat 12:12, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Virus card

I don't understand, why do you say Virus Card is not an archetype?--Computer Bug (talkcontribs) 21:56, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

What we've been calling archetypes are groups of cards connected by having a common term in their name, while there are (support) cards which affect cards specifically having that term in their name. e.g. "Elemental HERO". "Virus Card" does not fit that criteria. In the manga, Virus Card is however a type of card like Spell Card and Trap Card. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:19, April 12, 2013 (UTC)


Is there any proof that they are printing Legendary Magician of Dark and Legendary Dragon of White in the OCG? I checked both the references and NeoArkCradle listed 51 and 52 as unknowns while the official had no announcment of these.It's not about how many edits you make, its about how significant the edits you make are 01:53, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that Ricky, I had to search for the source myself. Ark linked to an image in the second page of the NAC thread that shows both cards, but he doesn't seem to have updated the OP, as you noticed. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:54, April 21, 2013 (UTC)