User talk:FredCat100/Archive 11

Re:Yami Marik's Death/Banish

Yeah, that's fine. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:57, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

language

Hey Fredcat, just curios, what IS your first Janguage Language? as said before, mine is Polish.--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 18:11, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

American Sign Language (and yes, I realize I'm a funny looking Fredcat =D ). 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 18:22, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Wtf was "janguage" shit you're put up? And what do you mean you're a funny looking, Dino? --FredCat 19:33, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Honest typo on his part? And I was referring to the fact that he asked you, but I answered. ;) 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 21:48, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

I see, I was at work when this was questioning... well, about to return to home by that minute. --FredCat 21:52, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Revival Jam Effect?

"When this card is sent to the Graveyard as a result of battle, you can pay 1000 Life Points. " = Cost

Des Wombat stops damage

damage ≠ cost ← you should know this by now

Life Absorbing Machine works with costs.

-Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:51, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Remove from play → Banish

Dinoguy says it's better to leave the cards alone until Konami specifically says that the particular card will reprinted. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 10:10, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Only the cards that are reprinted, and only the cards specifically mentioned in the article should be changed.

Cards that will not be reprinted should not be changed. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 10:14, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

For one, it was specifically discussion upon.

And also probably because Template:Hero and Concept:Hero (SMW is disabled so I can't link to it; I'll link to it after SMW is fixed, if I remember) would be too complicated if we use both, so all of them need to be changed at once. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 10:24, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Ryko's Effect Rulings

From Card Rulings:Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter; If "Peten the Dark Clown" is destroyed by "Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter", its effect cannot be activated. That proves that destroying and milling do not happen at the same time.

As for Forum:Hero Mask question... Garoth should work, but WC11 says otherwise, lets see what ATEM thinks. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:52, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Ojama Rainbow...

Seems like Deltaneos took care of it.... um... you don't really need to tell me about these sort of things; if I'm online, then I probably have an auto-refresher on the recent changes page and I'll see it anyways, if I'm not online, well, it wouldn't really make a difference. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:27, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: New Ruling Round 2

Yea, that looks right (missed Golem Dragon, Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder). Basically, if the card says "another" or "another monster", then the opponent can't attack.
If it says "another... except <same name>", then they can attack either one of the 2 cards with the same name (e.g. Batteryman D, Belial - Marquis of Darkness, Decoyroid, Oshaleon) -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:27, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

If the opponent has 2 Hamon, you cannot attack. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:24, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Polymer/Fusion/Merge

I'm updating the Card Rulings alphabetically. I haven't reached the letter F yet, that Fusion Recovery belongs. I'm still on the letter E. When I go to F I'll update Fusion Recovery's Rulings too. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 05:38, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Hey!

• Fred, I kept perfectly calm. All I did was oppose his silly accusations of harassment, and he starts crying like a little bitch... once again. But it's fine. I'm not getting into another revert war over his worthless little deck. I just wonder what his purpose actually is for posting up his deck ideas if he isn't going to take any of the advice, that's all. And I don't feel Boba deserved that sort of treatment over offering good advice. The poster didn't originally say the deck was for real-life, nor did he claim that he had insufficient funds to buy cards with, so, it was completely inexcusable. Someone has to stand up to that fool and make him realize that he can't do whatever he wants under the guide of all retaliation being "harassment." He's no saint.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:12, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah, I have to say, you have done a 180 recently. Good for you. I, for one, still strongly believe in making my opinion heard, though. If a flame war truly breaks out, fair enough, but he just thinks he can revert anything that he disagrees with, which he can't. He doesn't have as many rights as he wishes he did. I just want to make that clear.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:17, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

• Lol, no. "Doing a 180" is a saying. It means, you've become the opposite to how you used to be. In this context, it's a compliment. xP But I understand your concern and I'll take it on board, thanks.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:29, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't need to; I said that I had TESTED Pot of Duality on Dueling Network, not that this deck was built specifically FOR Dueling Network. Hell, the ONLY non-RL deck that I posted on here, I LISTED IT AS SUCH, so if there's anything to be assumed here, it's that the decks I'm posting, unless otherwise specified, ARE RL DECKS. Once again, he's assuming things that aren't actually there and putting words in my mouth that I didn't actually say. And BobaFett has known me through our interactions long enough to know that I am neither rich NOR care for tournament staples, so there was no need to tell him. Do you really, REALLY think that, if I had the money for the cards he suggested, I wouldn't already HAVE THEM in my deck? Yeah, that makes sense; since I didn't list that I was poor before, I shouldn't complain to him for suggesting I buy a $100 card to make my draw engine better, since I obviously have the money for it *rolls eyes*. And how cute, YamiWheeler calling my deck "worthless", even though this wasn't even his argument, he didn't need to butt in, and all I did against him was delete the seed of the flame war before it bloomed. And you tell ME to be calm? I'm giving them as much leeway as I possibly can, given their own treatment of me. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 23:22, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

• This is a conversation between two people not including you - this isn't a public forum. Yada yada yada, you're the victim - no one cares about your opinion here. I'm not going to argue with you, so please don't bother trying to talk to me again. I've already reported your fraudulent reverting.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:29, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

I am declare a cease talk on this damn topic! And that's including YamiWheeler! --FredCat 23:31, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

• That's fine.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:32, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Haha, funny topic. I loved reading the whole stuff :) (and don't worry Yami, you got my support^^) Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 00:07, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Didn't I said CEASE TALK ON THIS DAMN TOPIC!? --FredCat 00:08, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FredCat100. You have new messages at Montechristo95's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Field Barrier and Malevolent Catastrophe

Hi, I have a question.

If I have a field card in play with Field Barrier and my opponent activates Malevolent Catastrophe when I attacked, then does both my field card and Field Barrier become destroyed or only the Field Barrier?

--SittingWonderDuck (talk • contribs) 17:55, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Fusion Recovery Question

"Add 1 "Polymerization" and 1 Fusion Material Monster that was used for a Fusion Summon, from your Graveyard to your hand."

You can't add a Banished card to your hand.

Also, if the monster was Banished, then returned to the Graveyard, it would have forgotten that it was a Fusion Material Monster. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:29, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Politeness in Editing

About your edit summary here: you aren't allowed to talk to other users that way. You're especially not allowed to swear at other users like that. If you're going to be reverting people's edits, then you need to be a lot more civil. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 21:39, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Anime/OCG difference

"In future, be sure to keep your eyes on "OCG" or "TCG" in the main article before post up Ruling/Tip articles"

What do you think I did? That card was confirmed for OCG release. See: Photon Shockwave and Sharksucker. But the OCG effect wasn't confirmed, then the deletion is correct. Samurai Bruxo^{Discussão/Talk} 20:26, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

"But the OCG effect wasn't confirmed, then the deletion is correct"

This was what I have said. It was my mistake. Samurai Bruxo^{Discussão/Talk} 20:31, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect...

The guy wasn't "improving" my deck, he was trying to ram a single opinion of the deck down my throat, which was that 2 Senet Switches made the deck useless, and if I couldn't scrounge up the money to get a bunch of Pot of Dualities to improve my draw power, I need to get some Gold Soarcophagi, no matter the cost. He pounded this into my head regardless of what I told him to counter it and explain why it wasn't a feasible solution for me, at the moment. If he had stopped when I explained the situation to him, and moved on to something else or made an alternate suggestion on how I can improve my draw power (like, say, offering suggestions on what to replace Pot of Avarice with, for instance), I wouldn't have been so goddamn mad at him, but instead, he kept on hammering home the presumed importance of Sarcophagus, and I was getting sick of it. He's done this before, and if he refuses to stop, then he needs to just not touch my deck threads altogether, pure, plain and simple. I'd rather trust the original people who posted on that deck; at least they suggested stuff that made more sense, given my budget, like EndOfTheWorld suggesting I focus more on Storm Shooter. That I found helpful, not this crap of "Get Sarcophagus now, you need it now, it's easy to get it now, get it now now NOW, DAMNIT NOW!", like BobaFett was doing. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 22:27, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

I've tried asking politely to him to stop; I've done it in the past, and while it may not look like it, I did it this time, as well. He. Just. Will. Not. Listen. As I told him, he's the kind of person who just has to get his suggestions followed, no matter what, and to hell with what the person he's suggesting it to thinks; I've dealt with jackasses like him in the past, and they all degenerated into the same thing. So no, I'm sorry, but with him, being "chill of mind" is NOT going to work. Just keep him out of any of my deck threads from now on, please; I'm just as tired of this crap as you are, and the only way it'll continue is if he refuses to let it go and leave me alone as I asked him to do. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 22:55, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Great, and now YamiWheeler is harassing me again, over something that isn't even his business. Keep him away from me, as well, please? Is there even a way of blocking these guys from seeing your posts on the forums? SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 23:01, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

No, I don't get what you're saying, mainly because I haven't gotten pissy at ANY deck for beating me - and I've been beaten A LOT with my decks. If I have to, I WILL complain to the top administrator about these people, but I hope it won't come to that. As I tried to explain, I'm not against help, just against idiot/elitist duelists who keep on insisting I have X card in my deck, regardless of how much I tell them it wouldn't work, wouldn't be practical, wouldn't fit my theme, or would be impossible for me to get a hold of, like BobaFett, or people who put words in my mouth and twist my words to mean the complete opposite of what they mean, like YamiWheeler does. Believe me, I've dealt with these kids of jerks before, and in the end, the result is always the same; ultimately, the admins realize that THEY were the spark of the problem, NOT me.SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 23:36, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

...Fix the conflicts? How can I "fix the conflicts" if the other side of the conflict is the problem, in the first place? As I said, my issue with BobaFett is that he wouldn't stop pressing the issue with Gold Sarcophagus, even after I explained to him several times that I couldn't get a hold of them, right now; my issue with YamiWheeler is that he keeps putting words in my mouth and twisting what I said to make me say something else than I actually mean, like twisting my statement that I didn't find Reborn Tengu that useful in my Jackal Lock deck to mean I hated it entirely and found it useless in ALL decks (which is stupid, since even blind person could see I have three in my Senet Switch deck; kinda hard to say I find it useless in ALL decks if I'm using it in one of my decks, huh?). As I said, it usually starts and ends the same way; they get into an argument with me, the mods step in, treat me like the bad guy for a while, and then I have to force them to examine the evidence again, after which they finally learn the other side is the one who instigated it. So again, how can I "fix the conflicts" if I'm not eve the freaking start of them? SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 23:48, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Hard to ignore them when I end up being a magnet to them just by opening my mouth, no matter what comes out of it. But fine, so be it; I'll ignore them, and silently report them to the mods when they try this crap again. Deal? SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 23:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Forum Conflict

No worries, I'm picky at things as you might have noticed :p

-Resk (✩) 23:54, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, i just find it hard to get so heated over a card game, I just tend to find it silly when others get so 'rage' over it :3-Resk (✩) 00:12, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, I only really doing that when testing decks out before i go look out my obscure cards, when i'm playing at a locals or whatever, i prefer to have the actuall cards, though i suppose i can get away with that as i have a big-ish collection :3-Resk (✩) 00:24, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Error in your "HERO" list

Yea, it's "HERO'S Bond". Thanks for the note! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 10:11, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Formula Synchron/Solemn Judgment

Do you mean the rulings that Falzar and I are talking about?

In the OCG, "Formula Synchron"'s effect doesn't directly Synchro Summon. Instead, it just allows you to perform a Synchro Summon at a weird time. The Summon is just like any other Synchro Summon, so "Solemn Judgment" can negate it.

It's kinda like "Double Summon". "Double Summon" doesn't directly Normal Summon the monster -- it just lets you perform another Normal Summon. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 22:55, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean the second sentence in the ruling, about interrupting the Chain? That's only if "Formula Synchron" is Chain Link 2. Build the Chain:

• Chain Link 1: Whatever
• Chain Link 2: "Formula Synchron"

(resolve)

• Chain Link 2: "Formula Synchron"

(Right now, you perform the Synchro Summon. You're in the middle of resolving a Chain [Chain Link 1 still has to resolve], so you can't activate "Solemn Judgment".)

• Chain Link 1: Whatever.

--Deus Ex Machina ✉ 03:13, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean to "Solemn Judgment" "Formula Synchron"? Yes, that's possible. The ruling doesn't talk about that. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 21:58, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Who are you calling moron?

Where you calling me a moron or where you saying that to the spamming 10 year old? --Azure Knight-Zeo (talk • contribs) 20:00, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

I see, thank you for clearing that up. --Azure Knight-Zeo (talk • contribs) 20:05, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

RE: One Article vs. Bunch Articles

I was going to do them, but I had to go for a while.
It's so much easier to use those automatically generated links to move the rest isn't it?
As opposed to having to find them separately. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:57, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

I personally would see of they got the message in the edit summaries first.

But, if you want to do it now, then go ahead. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 14:24, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Link Problems

I think I was tired when I uploaded that so I didn't realize that the picture was wrong even though I hit preview, since I made another mistake (http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=File:VampireGenesis-EN-Anime-GX.png&diff=next&oldid=1493589) at about the same time. - Silver Glaceon @ 21:57, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't want to because if I took a nap it would be hard to get back to sleep. - Silver Glaceon @ 22:11, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't actually take a nap IIRC - Silver Glaceon @ 22:31, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't that tired, I was just tired enough to make a couple small mistakes - Silver Glaceon @ 22:36, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Majestic Star Dragon

For the record, I don't have one. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 14:11, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

card name

Regent is a typical bad boy hair style Japanese antique. Their cards is that based on the slang used in Japanese culture such a bad boy. Menchi（メンチ) is a shorthand for Menchiokiru(メンチを切る), because it is slang or its etymology is not ascertained. -- III (talk • contribs) 21:26, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

III is probably the best Japanese speaker out of the regular users on this site. III's translation matches the Japanese name better than the other one. The other one isn't from an official source either. It was done by a fan who admits his Japanese isn't perfect.

It's not just Wikipedia who are saying "リーゼント" = "regent". You can find loads more sites on Google. I think the proper Japanese katakana spelling of "resent" is "リゼント". If Konami/the writers of the anime wanted the card to be "Resent Blizzardon", it would have made more sense for them to use that spelling. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:33, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Move them ALLLLLLLL!

Err, yes I know that! It's just that yesterday I had some problems with my connection and I couldn't do much. I was going to move all the other pages today. By the way I was waiting for responses like yours! xD ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 08:23, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Congratulation

• How is it my fault that he talks a lot of shit but can't handle the repercussions? I stopped talking to him hours ago, and I was trolling no one. He's the one that constantly challenges basic play opinion, with his "advantage is BS" and "everyone who does anything that I don't like is elitist" mentality. I was fairly civil to him earlier, and when he got rude, I stopped talking. You are not helping him by letting him play the victim every time he doesn't like what he hears. That's the reason why he's "exploding into pieces." Don't argue with me, Fred.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:03, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

• Oh, I'm sorry. I see you defending him a lot so I thought you were serious. Frankly, that's what he gets for calling everybody elitist and going on, and on, and on.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:07, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Darkly Signer Dragon...? - Reply

You're welcome ! :)

I saw that Machine Dragon Power Tool didn't have an article, so I did it. As for Ancient Fairy Dragon's counterpart... I don't know its name. It must follow the same pattern than the two others... "[something] Dragon Ancient Fairy", for example. Anyway, it appears along with Power Tool on this picture. Maybe the kanji on this picture are the names of the dragons. I can't read those unfortunately. HPZ - O.N.E. (talk • contribs) 10:15, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Too late. HPZ - O.N.E. (talk • contribs) 10:16, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

No problem, you did right. HPZ - O.N.E. (talk • contribs) 11:40, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

D.D.R.

i only know it from when it was a realllly old FTK back when he was Limited, you'd probably have to ask -dest- for the more updated one, I'd figure it out, but i'm heading to work soon :3

-Resk (✩) 10:36, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Which effect is Continuous

That part is in the category of "Summon". I read its rulings and it turns out the part where it destroys itself is the Continuous effect. Made the revert as soon as I found out.PoirotH (talk • contribs) 02:51, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Cost vs. Negate

eh... what? he proved me to be right, see point 2... ok, exiled force is a bad example for this, since it can be tributed just after summoning, but that doesn't change the fact, that the effect can be negated by veiler if used bevore it gets tributed. -dest- (talk • contribs) 02:16, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

It may be a cost, but it can be negated by veiler if not instantly tributed (as said bevore, exiled force was just a bad example, lets take stardust here, you'll definitly use veiler bevore activating a destruction effect^^). Veiler (as well as challice and all the other of that sort linked in the faq) negates all effects which activate and resolve on the field, and that is the case with (exiled force/)stardust. The effect activates and resolves on the field, it doesn't matter where the monster is. Those cards that tribute for a cost can only escape from Skill Drain since that checks where the monster is at effect resolution, but veiler and the like check where the monster was at effect activation. -dest- (talk • contribs) 02:58, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Fusion Mosnter Material

Just a typo in the official Ruling. We must leave it like that by the way! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 10:26, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Exactly! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 10:32, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Monster Reborn

The fact that Monster Reborn can be used to summon those two is more than likely down to the individual cards (We indeed have Dreadscythe as a Semi-Nomi, a legitimate target for Monster Reborn).--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:13, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

BLS - Envoy can be Special Summoned from the Graveyard, as long as it was Special Summoned by it's own condition first. Pretty sure that Dreadscythe was Summoned with it's own effect first, before Monster Reborn was played. Also, just because Shining Dragon for us cannot be Summoned except by it's own effect, the anime would not necessarily have included that clause.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:26, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

BLS-Envoy certainly is a Semi-Nomi, Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon for us is a Nomi, but for the Movie, it was effectively a Semi-Nomi (in lieu of actual card text to disprove that).--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:38, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Partially my point. The anime version of the card will not have had that Summoning clause in there (Unless you can find visible card lore from the card used in the Movie)--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:49, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

BLS

Barrier Statue of the Heavens won't stop Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning, as BLS is a LIGHT monster.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 17:55, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Rabbit and Gladiator

Thanks for reminding me.BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:19, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

If I do that gives a bad link because my signature uses this template that's not on this wiki.BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:30, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I did-I don't use tildes on this wiki to sign my comments.BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:35, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Talkheader

• And what you did made absolutely no difference. If you wanted to help the situation, you should have added a delete tag and said what you wanted to say, and left it at that.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:50, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Weakly Fusion Substitute

You can't substitute "machine type monsters". Another example would be absolute zero, you can't substitute "Hero" or "Water", the only reason why king of the swamp can be used in it is its Water atribute. And CyDra can't be substitute because the card says "You can only Special Summon this card from your Extra Deck by sending the above cards from either side of the field to the Graveyard." -dest- (talk • contribs) 22:42, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Sadly I have no idea how to search for those. The only thing I could do is looking up in WC11, but it won't be possible until monday evening. It would greatly help if you could send me a reminder then, as far as I know me I'll forget it without one... :) -dest- (talk • contribs) 10:38, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

I'll just list the monsters which can't use substitutes that are included in the game. The only exceptions here are monsters like King of the Swamp who fit the type (water) to be used for certain monsters (Absolute Zero) for example.

Armityle the Chaos Phantom

Barbaroid, the Ultimate Battle Machine

Evil Hero Dark Gaia

Chimeratech Fortress Dragon

Cyber End Dragon

Cyber Ogre 2

Cyber Twin Dragon

Cyber Blader

D.3.S. Frog

Dragon Knight Draco-Equiste

Dark Balter the Terrible

Gem-Knight Aquamarine

Gem-Knight Ruby

Gem-Knight Topaz

Elemental HERO Absolute Zero

Elemental HERO Air Neos

Elemental HERO Aqua Neos

Elemental HERO Chaos Neos

Elemental HERO Dark Neos

Elemental HERO Divine Neos

Elemental HERO Flare Neos

Elemental HERO Gaia

Elemental HERO Glow Neos

Elemental HERO Grand Neos

Elemental HERO Great Tornado

Elemental HERO Magma Neos

Elemental HERO Marine Neos

Elemental HERO Nova Master

Elemental Hero Storm Neos

Elemental HERO The Shining

Five-Headed Dragon

Blaze Fenix, the Burning Bombardment Bird

Arcana Knight Joker

Gladiator Beast Gaiodiaz

Gladiator Beast Gyzarus

Gladiator Beast Heraklinos

Naturia Exterio

Supreme Arcanite Magician

Rainbow Neos

Ryu Senshi

Destiny End Dragoon

Super Vehicroid Jumbo Drill

UFOroid Fighter

Ultimate Axon Kicker

Fiend Skull Dragon

Vision HERO Adoration

Vision HERO Trinity

VW-Tiger Catapult

VWXYZ-Dragon Catapult Cannon

Worm Zero

XY-Dragon Cannon

XYZ-Dragon Cannon

XZ-Tank Cannon

YZ-Tank Dragon

-dest- (talk • contribs) 22:06, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

|} ?

hey, what does that code do in galleries? i always see it, but never knew what it does. LastMinute (talk • contribs) 21:22, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

In wikimarkup, tables begin with a {| and end with a |}. The box around galleries is a table. You don't see the beginning {| because it's added by the {{GalleryHeader}} template.

The page might look fine when |} is left out, but it is bad coding and might not be working on someone else's computer or it could break entirely when other changes are made to the page itself or the coding it uses. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:43, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

Also that caused the future boxes (actually, bottom - like Anime's) to become including the original box. So I put it there to block it from happening. So if you wish to know, try visit the history to know why. --FredCat 21:47, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Grey text

Which name and question.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 17:30, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

"Number 61: Volcasaurus" came later. the very 1st "Number" introduced was "Utopia" in Anime/Manga and OCG/TCG. So you search for its edit history and look there. I think "002517" has a good reason like I told "Deltaneos" We didn't ask the same way you and Dino asked. +/- I got confused with January and July That's Y I thought "84.175.91.3" did it. I din't look in Dino's profile for a long time.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 17:49, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

I never editted the animelore for "Numbers" so far.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 14:31, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't ask a question about grey text either. That was "Daltaneos" asked me "Where are the "Number" monsters shown to have...unlike the Dark Synchro Monsters, whose first effect line actually is grey" Then I thought it was "84.175.91.3" and you know the rest, I think.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 20:11, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
...Same way U asked Dino... That's very true.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 20:23, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Missed the memo

I didn't know we changed the name of Houho to Ho-o and I assumed it was a spam post. I apologize. --Azure Knight-Zeo (talk • contribs) 16:05, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Message for Resk

Due to some program glitch that I cannot enter your Talk Page complete, so I have to respond it here. "Shadowdragon5710 (talk • contribs)" is an idiot and cannot take the clue that Cost is the requirement and always decided that "Cost" is also part of the effect. I think it's time to put his life to end. --FredCat 23:11, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

You know for a young person you are very brash, you dont think things through clearly and like to bash too quickly. Being that this site can be edited by anyone at anytime i dont take these rulings 100%, posting and getting comments from others helps me to understand why things work, cursing me out because you assume your right and im wrong is not very mature and i will never listen to anyone who does that after that point. I think you should consult other higher ranked judges before you assume you are correct on wyvern, HIS EFFECT IS THE COST PERIOD. Shadowdragon5710 (talk • contribs) 23:17, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

And Cost is Condition, read the damn "Cost" for crying out fucking loudly, Shadow-loser! --FredCat 23:19, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Doomcal vs. Red-Eyes Wyvern Ruling

Red-Eyes Wyvern only has 1 effect.

During your End Phase, if you did not Normal Summon or Set a monster this turn, you can remove from play this card from your Graveyard to Special Summon 1 "Red-Eyes" monster from your Graveyard, except "Red-Eyes B. Chick".

Activation condition, Cost, Effect

Chain Link 1: Red-Eyes Wyvern (Removed as Cost)

Chain Link 2: DCK (Tribute as Cost)

resolve:

Chain Link 2: DCK

Chain Link 1: Red-Eyes Wyvern (Negated)

-Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 23:50, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: "Creature Swap" Future Reprint...

There is no reason for "Creature Swap" to be changed to target. I guess the new solved text should also read something like "select", but not "target". ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 16:12, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

Help!

Well, that's all I can say. I ended up deleting the Archive you helped me create, so I was wondering if you could post it up again? I can copy the Archive Template named "Kitty's comments" and edit that, but I can't seem to see where the rules thing is. So, can you just give me that? ---Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 23:27, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I ruined all that hard work, you did Fred. I can't seem to undo it either, so can you be a pal? ---Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 23:28, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Can you just redo it for me Fred? This time I'll save the code on a Notepad document. ---Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 01:08, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Cool, got it. Need the rules thing tough. ---Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 16:05, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. ---Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 20:13, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Questions on Rulings Talk Pages

Please don't move a person's question to the forum, especially without telling them. You don't have the authority to move pages around.

If you're going to delete people's questions, then you should leave them a message explaining why you deleted it, and telling them what they can do about it. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 00:57, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Falzar is a sysop. He can move pages around, like when he moved [[Card Rulings talk:The Winged Dragon of Ra]] to Forum:The Winged Dragon of Ra Questions.

You're not a sysop, and you don't have move powers. You shouldn't be going around and "moving" things, like you did with Forum:Jurrac Questions (Series). You especially shouldn't be doing this with the poster not knowing about this. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 22:23, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

I honestly don't see a problem with him doing this. All users can move pages that are not protected. Forum posts are not an exception. As far as I'm concerned, it should have in been in the forum to begin with. Moving it to its proper place shouldn't be an issue, and informing the user that you did so is a courtesy, not a requirement. There is no consensus anywhere that says that users can't move things to the forums, sysop or not. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:41, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

You need to review a new contributers contributions.

The place to start is Solemn Judgment's Gallery. I have already left him a message regarding the naming of files. However your two cents might carry more weight. I noticed in the gallery a line about rssfeed that I am pasting here. I don't really see what he is trying to do.

rssfeed="Solemn Judgment DLG1-EN046"

I pulled off the extra sections of the line to focus on the rssfeed part.

Glittersword ^{Talk • Contributions} 23:26, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

• Sorry about this, but we seemed to have spotted two different new contributors. I was talking about User:Steven Almendarez on the gallery page. There was no argument though I just sent him some pointers. The reason I went to you was the fact you were the last editor before his edits. Glittersword ^{Talk • Contributions} 00:21, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Dark Simorgh Deck

I'm wasn't going to delete it. I think Dark Simorgh decks are a common enough deck type, and we don't have a page for them yet (and the page is made fairly well). But if anything thinks it's not common enough, I won't stop them adding the deletion notice and reason, before being discussed upon. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:37, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Kitty's Mistake

No worries we all make mistakes every once a while, i understand, plus the game is getting more complex, new cards, added, lots of more spammers out there. Almost makes you feel like the Overworked card, hehe. ^^

--Fryhop (talk • contribs) 03:43, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

I have the same time, but i woke up later most likely. Anyways we all are just trying our best, not too long from now a lot of the old cards might be replaced with new ones. Well I'm not going to count how many they might have to redo X3. --Fryhop (talk • contribs) 04:02, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, and cya around ^^. A little off subject, but i was talking to my friend a few days ago, that I think it be great if Konami, not just make cards but also tell a little bio to a story about how each card that has multiple cards to it and how they are connected. Especial the dark counterparts to some of the cards and like the story of D.D. Warrior Lady, you know hehe. --Fryhop (talk • contribs) 04:39, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

RE: New Ruling Article

Fixed! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 20:37, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Re: "Villain article"

Comment on the talk page's deletion discussion if you want. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:57, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Another Warning

About your comment on Forum:Mother spider?: you're not supposed to do that. You're supposed to treat other users with respect, even if they're breaking rules.

I've warned you about your attitude before. If you continue to disrespect other users, then I'll be forced to take more drastic actions than just leaving you with a warning. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 02:27, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Especially if it's their very first question. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:31, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

It's because I am tired of not see them doing right thing. And if you don't like what I am doing, then I will not bother help with rulings anymore. --FredCat 11:29, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Answer to your Message

I didn't have a discussion with ATEM. What do you mean "undo what I did"? I just fixed a mistake on the Koa'ki Meiru ruling with Morphing Jar #2. It used to say "Koa'ki Meiru Speeder: This effect will destroy monsters that have been Special Summoned in face-down Defense Position by effects like "Morphing Jar #2." ".

However, Koa'ki Meiru Speeder doesn't destroy anything, Koa'ki Meiru Speeder just lets you draw again if you draw the Iron Core of Koa'ki Meiru during the Draw Phase. The correct Koa'ki Meiru monster who destroys Special Summoned monsters, even when they're Special Summoned Faced-Down is Koa'ki Meiru Tornado. All I did was basically fix a mistake no one seemed to have caught.

Tea-Girl08 1:28, July 28, 2011 (EST)

I think there's a misunderstanding somewhere. I can't leave it alone since it isn't Konami's word, it's an error that someone typed in by mistake. I fixed the mistake so it would be accurate to the rules of Konami. It's even in the rules of Koa'ki Meiru Tornado,

""This effect will destroy monsters that have been Special Summoned in face-down Defense Position by effects like "Morphing Jar #2."[1] "".

Which Koa'ki Meiru Tornado has the link to the rules. I did not add any new rules, nor did I delete any rules. All I did was fix an error, a mistake, a typo, inaccurate information, so it would say what Konami has already said on this matter. Tea-Girl08 11:45, July 28, 2011 (EST)

Sadly, I don't think there was an "undo" option for this, since I think it's been there for a while now. Plus, I didn't want to mess with the "undo" option and mess up somewhere. I will say sorry for not telling one of you guys on this inaccurate information, but I thought it would be just a simple "quick fix" and something I shouldn't have to bother anyone with. Tea-Girl08 11:53, July 28, 2011 (EST)