User talk:Gerhardified

If you're looking for answers, I don't have them

• If you need help look for an admin, someone more experienced, or ask for help on the forums. Me, I'm just a drifter, fixing things, deleting non relevant things, adding tips and trivia. Sorry.

--Azure Knight-Zeo 20:15, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

DT08 cards

Unfortunately, I don't have any cards. I just found the images of them from the Internet and upload them here. --Blackwings0605 13:13, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, alright. Thanks a lot for your quick reply. It's amazing how quickly you and some other people work on this site. Thanks for updating all of this data. I can't read much Japanese yet and rely on this site for errata and the like.

Sincerely,

Gerard

P.S. Do you know if there is any kind of trade thread that is active on this site, or any other reputable websites that aren't merely forums?

The film

Where do you saw the film.

Who win. Also, tell me who are Junk Gardna Synchro Material.

That mean that Junk Gardna level 6. Did Yusei used new cards.

I deleted the Elemental Hero Neos Knight, because the first trivia mentioned that it was the only Fusion monster in which Neos can fuse with another E-Hero, which is not true. And second one that mentions who used it goes in the appearances section.PoirotH 15:45, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Blackfeather Dragon

Those points you've made still doesn't lead to the fact that it's a Signer dragon, lots of Synchro monsters can be Summoned using any Tuner and just because it's not part of the Archetype, it doesn't automatically lead one to believe that it's part of the 5 Dragons. It must be shown in the anime that it's a part of the five Dragons. Also, even if it was a Signer Dragon, trivia like that is not put there but rather here here.PoirotH 04:24, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Just because Crow is the 5th Signer and he will have this Synchro does NOT make this the 5th Dragon, heck the 2 Dragons (BFD & 5th Dragon) do not look anything alike, as compared to the other 4 Dragons. Also, it isn't related to the Blackwings because with the Blackwings their OCG name is Black Feather [Burakku Fezā] (with a space between the 2 words) versus this Dragon's name whose OCG is Blackfeather [Burakkufezā](no space).Altyrell 04:27, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

BFD

I would find it extremely difficult to believe that the creators bothered to generate a "Crow card" with "Dragon" in its name, unless it was specifically designed to form part of the quintent of Signer Dragons. It appears self-evident that this card must be the last/final/fifth Dragon of 5Ds franchise's name.

Thank you for pointing out the correct location for that information I was interested in. I am sure this will be resolved to your mutual satisfaction soon enough.

BFD

I would find it extremely difficult to believe that the creators bothered to generate a "Crow card" with "Dragon" in its name, unless it was specifically designed to form part of the quintent of Signer Dragons. It appears self-evident that this card must be the last/final/fifth Dragon of 5Ds franchise's name.

Thank you for pointing out the correct location for that information I was interested in. I am sure this will be resolved to your mutual satisfaction soon enough.

Gerhardified 05:39, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

• One problem, the Fifth Dragon and the Blackfeather Dragon do NOT look like each other at all. And no, saying the old man stated that they will have changed through the ages doesn't mean the appearance will be different because the old man meant that they would go from physical creatures to Card Form. Not to mention when you look at the other 4 Dragons before and after becoming Cards they didn't change their physical appearance, therefore the 5th Dragon's physical appearance will not have changed either. So no, Blackfeather Dragon is NOT the 5th Dragon in any shape, way, or form.

Altyrell 23:49, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Your opinion remains your own, Altyrell. As we already know, there are others who agree with you. I am simply in the opposite camp.

Gerhardified 01:17, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Speed Warrior

Do you want to be my friend

Speed Warrior 12:20, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing, seems harmless enough.

Are you working on any new decks at the moment? I just got the Shining Darkness stuff, and am in the middle of trying to make a Chaos Goddess deck. Just not sure what is worth summoning from the grave as a LV 5 Dark.

Gerhardified 11:25, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Talk: Power Tool Dragon

Do you have any ideas to improve the page? --LordGeovanni 21:04, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, nothing revolutionary. Just the usual. Cutting things down to simplest form, really.

Gerhardified 00:51, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, most if not all of the tips are valid. The card is just good and that is why there is so much. --LordGeovanni 03:13, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Phoenix Gearfried

As far as I know, all Gemini monsters are treated as Effect Monsters in the hand, so it's not just Gearfried. Anyway, you're welcome. --Blue (Talk) 20:11, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Like this guy

This guy is great he fixed my edit to Card tips Syncro Boost by fixing the spelling and gramer every other guy ive spoken about was insulting them but this is my nisest coment.

// written by gerhardified // I don't know who you are, exactly, but I would suggest making an account for your editing. It helps everyone out a lot, and even keeps track of the pages you've edited for the benefit of you and everyone else. Thank you for the kind words.

Ruling Article

Thank you for help fixing the Ruling Article in "Earthbound Immortal Chacu Challhua": But are you sure they are same as the official source that left by Konami? If not, then may you please revert it back to normal - we have to follow Konami's word, regard grammar and typo error. --iFredCat 12:04, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

Hello FredCat100.

Thank you for following up on the ruling edits I made. Yes, I am certain that the ruling wording changes I made are correct, as the Kanji "半分" is read as "hanbun", or half in Japanese. So it clearly states that the effect damage of the DEF position effect is the same in Japanese as it is in English.

Sincerely,

Gerhardified (talk • contribs) 13:10, August 29, 2012 (UTC) Gerhardified

Ok, you may have to talk with YamiWheeler about your logical - as he disagreed with your change. --iFredCat 13:13, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

You weren't clear when you made the edit. Your edit summary made it seem as if you were editing it based on the card text, and not based on the ruling. If the ruling on Konami's website says that, then fine.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:18, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

A source would also be helpful, since the link on the page no longer takes you to Konami's Q&A site.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:19, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

---

Well, to be absolutely clear, I was going from the card text alone. If that is a problem, and you can tell me that the card's rulings actually conflict with the card text, then so be it. If the ruling in the OCG is that I can actually deal 2400 LP in effect damage and not 1200 LP in effect damage per turn, I would love to see some evidence backed by Konami. If there is no evidence to contradict the card's text, then I will always assume that the card text is correct. In short, I believe that if the card says that I can deal half of the card's DEF as effect damage, then the OCG will do the same thing that the TCG does. Especially since the card's text is the same in both languages.

Gerhardified (talk • contribs) 13:26, August 29, 2012 (UTC) Gerhardified

Read this. That's how we are proving the rulings directly from Konami. --iFredCat 13:31, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

---

Dear FredCat,

Thank you again for taking the time to provide some evidence of your point of view. I'm glad to see that we both agree and that my changes make the Wikia the same as the rulings you have linked me to.

Please note that the earlier change I made to correct the syntax (word order) error made the ruling on the Wikia exactly the same as the one you linked to posted on Shriek TCG.

Enjoy your evening.

Gerhardified (talk • contribs) 13:38, August 29, 2012 (UTC) Gerhardified

You've misunderstood the point, but I'm waiting for clarification from an admin before I continue.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:43, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

I am with Yami, you're just little misunderstand what I was such to do - Anything mentioned in that rulings I posted is such to be posting in the Ruling Article. That has nothing to do with being agreeing with you. I only ask you to read the list of rulings in that link I gave, that's it. --iFredCat 14:34, August 29, 2012 (UTC)