Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the Ojama page.
If you need help, you can consult these pages:
... Please do not use YGOPro/DevPro as "proof" that a card works a certain way. The card isn't even released yet, and there are no rulings for it. Why are the monsters protected during the End Phase? Because the Organization (a translator team) said so, based on what the wording seems to imply. However, the OCG could very easily issue a ruling that says this card can't protect them during the End Phase, and it wouldn't contradict the text at all. YGOPro/DevPro is very vulnerable to human error, so I hope you never again proclaim a card works because "it worked like this on DevPro." --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 07:30, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
Hello I am very interested in improving the Ghostrick page and see you are too. Here is the code I would love to add; just wanting your thoughts (mainly on the card type and spells and traps)
|Ghostrick Field Spells|
|Ghostrick Traps||Trap Type|
|Ghostrick-Go-Round||Continuous Trap Card|
|Ghostrick Vanish||Normal Trap Card|
|Ghostrick Scare||Normal Trap Card|
|Ghostrick Night||Continuous Trap Card|
I think it looks good! I'm not sure if it's customary to add all of the card members of an archetype to the top of the page (I would say double-check with other archetype pages) but other than that it looks great. I second your idea. :) Karasuhebi (talk • contribs) 20:30, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
About Ghostrick Table
Sorry for not answering your messages quickly. There is a reason why I'm removing the "monster type" in that table. It's because that table is too wide when you see it in 1240x768 screen, it makes that ghostrick page out of order and unpleasant to see. Maybe you don't see that problem because you see it on a wider screen?
That's why I'm removing the unnecessary info on that table, and "monster type" is my top pick. It's a redundant info anyway, and it eat too much space it makes the table wider than necessary.