User talk:Mattwo

Its It's It is!

"Its" is indeed a word, as for explain; "The cat looked at its prey before it jumped to tackling on the prey." --FredCat 19:22, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

Right I forgot. My brain isn't at 100% right now. Mattwo (talk • contribs) 20:00, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

Please, if you got a chance, read the message in my Yellow Box before you click "leave message". I copied and moved it here from my Talk Page. And other user who has same amount of edit number also agreed with me and just undoing your edit. But it's okay, we all learning something new altogether; friend or foe. --FredCat 20:02, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

RE: I don't appreicate you making assumptions about my intentions.

I beg your pardon, but I don't have time to ask the authors of every single edit I revert what their intentions were. In this case, you're still making an unnecessary comparison with the following word: "though". Real life and the anime are separate; what the anime omitted makes no impact on what the playerbase named the Summons of the GB Fusion Monsters. The emphasis here is that the Summons were similar enough for the players to apply the term "Contact Fusion" to other cards. The anime doesn't aim to accurately portray the behavior of real-life players. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 20:22, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

Of course it insistence. Why? It's because Adrian doesn't want power. He wants to protect the world, even if it costs a few lives. Isn't that want anti-heroes are about? Bopdog111 (talk • contribs)Bopdog111

Relpy to your message

Of course it insistence. Why? It's because Adrian doesn't want power. He wants to protect the world, even if it costs a few lives. Isn't that want anti-heroes are about? Bopdog111 (talk • contribs)Bopdog111

Dammit, this isn't about Hitler! Adrian was fighting for justice, and wants to protect the world so that doesn't make him a complete villain. Bopdog111 (talk • contribs) 23:22, April 24, 2017 (UTC)Bopdog111

Your the one who is oversimplifying things! Bopdog111 (talk • contribs) 18:30, April 25, 2017 (UTC)Bopdog111

You made the so-called 'Children's Online Privacy Protection Act policies' up. And besides I am following the rules, just correcting the wrong like you just made. Bopdog111 (talk • contribs) 22:14, April 25, 2017 (UTC)Bopdog111

Mattwo didn't. A totally different set of board members did. And you might want to look here on why your edits were reverted. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 23:43, April 25, 2017 (UTC)

RE

Is there a reason that you're bringing this up now? You were both wrong. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 10:38, June 2, 2017 (UTC)

I don't consider you involved. Neither of you will be, and there will be no more edit wars on the subject. End of story. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 23:25, June 2, 2017 (UTC)