Talk:Barian

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Barian.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Appearance

Can we still list the appearance of the species as the same as Vector because it seems that he is the only one who looked like that. Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 16:57, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Its left unspecified in-series. The other Barians are clearly wearing clothes in their true forms, under which could be energy forms like Vector. Or not. We don't actually know. It probably would be better to replace the image of Vector with one of another Barian though. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:22, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Now that Vector has been shown with a non-energy form should it be changed to reflect that they aren't an energy species but as a humanoid one as now the only Barian's who haven't shown their true forms are Rei and Durbe.

Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 18:31, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

VBarian

I think we should consider that the BARian's name is not only a joke, but the place is most likely built by humans. As such Rei Shingetsu's badge should be considered the official romanization above the BARian. Kore wa shomeidesu. (talk • contribs) 16:50, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Barian World#Barian/Varian Page Renaming. --The Goblin 16:52, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Barian

• How about moving "Barian (species)" to "Barian"? IgorThunderMaster (talk • contribs) 23:42, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

I agree. Then, in the page we add "For other uses, see 'Barian (disambiguation)'". It's much simpler. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:16, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Cloaked

Um... I don't think images of each Barian cloaked is needed for their articles... It adds nothing and just makes the page more loaded. I mean, it's just a cloak, we don't add images of the characters with every different clothe they use, y'know. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:16, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

I don't mind them, but Durbe and Misael's articles aren't large enough to support that many images in one section. While we're on the subject, why are we using the Barian true forms as the article pictures. They appear (Durbe aside) in their human forms more often. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:40, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

I guess your answer is in your question: because it's their "true forms". For example, Yeager and Tokunosuke appeared disguised many times in the series, but the right choice for the article pictures of them is obviously their "true forms", undisguised; the Barians, too, have to use a "human disguise" in the human world 'cause you know why, it's a similar case. In my opinion true form as main picture and a human form picture in the article's body is perfect. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:51, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

I sort of think that when someone hears "Gilag", they think of his human form, so that's what the infobox picture should be. They don't picture his Barian form. As for cloaks, feel free to remove them. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:54, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Sure, but if I say "Durbe" or "Vector", I bet you imagine their true forms, don't you? Vector didn't even show a human form. Also, some people may think of Gilag's true form instead, for example. Dunno, I personally don't think that a good reason to use their human forms pictures, but if you think it's better like that, no objections.

And I'll remove the cloaked pictures then. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 01:31, March 26, 2013 (UTC)