Forum:A New Type?

Anybody think there should be a new type of monster? That would be cool. Psychic didn't turn out the way I wanted but it was cool. Leave your awesome comments below. Fallensilence 06:33, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Fallensilence

I doubt it. When Psychics first came out, they were faced with quite a bit of criticism, particularly why Konami decided to break the status quo by introducing one more Type, rather than making an archetype. --Gadjiltron 07:06, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Wow. Did not know that. Fallensilence 07:07, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Fallensilence

I agree. They screwed up most of the types to begin with (What's the difference between a Sea Serpent and a Fish again?) (Dinosaurs and Reptiles... could've been mushed together, don't you think?), so I don't think introducing another Type would be the cause of much praise.--Akiza Izayoi 15:56, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion a big reason why introducing Psychics was a bad idea is Jinzo. It's more of a Psychic than any of the actual Psychics, it even has Psycho in it's (Japanese) name! Obviously they can't reprint it as a Psychic, it would screw everything up, but if Psychics were going to exist it should have been one from the beginning. I agree that it should have been an Archetype, primarily of Fiends, Machines, and Spellcasters, which is what most of them look like anyway. - Lappyzard 16:03, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Where's the Mammal, Bird, and Amphibian Type? The already have Reptiles and Fish. Watch there be a Bacteria Type. Just sayin.--Yugioh DED 16:15, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

But really, I think they should take out Fish, Sea Serpent, and Beast-Warrior. And the Psychics should be an archetype with them being Spellcaster-Type.--Yugioh DED 16:19, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Bird is probably Winged Beast... And a Bacteria type would be unnecessary. There wouldn't be nearly enough support, and pre-existing cards would be messed up.--Akiza Izayoi 16:20, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, but if they could figure out a good way to take those Types out, they should. And it would be only fair that all five animals types are made into Types (mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, and fish.....I think that's all of them) since they already have two.--Yugioh DED 16:28, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Beast could probably be considered mammal, Winged Beast could probably be considered bird, Reptile exists, Amphibian currently tends to fall under Aqua, and Fish exists. So aside from amphibian, they're covered. -Lappyzard 16:37, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Besides, creating "Amphibian" would completely murder the Frog Archetype.--Akiza Izayoi 17:22, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

@Lappyzard: That's going to be hard to get used to. Fallensilence 17:40, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Fallensilence

What about Beast-Warrior, where the @#!*% did that come from?--Yugioh DED 17:50, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

You have a point. Where did that come from? Maybe they just couldn't think of a type for monsters with weapons. Fallensilence 17:53, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Fallensilence

germs that be cool

Dude you are brilliant! I never thought of that. Wait that would fall into aqua. Never mind. Fallensilence 17:55, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Fallensilence

What about a Fungus type?.HouseholdCatDeity 00:01, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

It's called Plants.--Akiza Izayoi 00:05, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

well then what about a Fungus archetype?HouseholdCatDeity 00:12, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

what is it with people and bacteria--Bwinggale 00:13, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Swine flu? Fallensilence 00:14, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind a Fungus archetype....--Akiza Izayoi 00:15, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

• No. They f**ked up Psychic-Type monsters big-time. Konami need to really THINK before they add an unnecessary Type ever again.--YamiWheeler 00:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

That's what I've been saying.--Akiza Izayoi 00:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

It's hard making archetypes and their effects so don't count on it. Fallensilence 00:18, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

When the Psychic Type was introduced, I started to wonder why all of Espa Roba's cards aren't Psychic-Type.Scizor99 00:21, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

They never thought of it sooner than later. Fallensilence 00:22, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. Instead, we get Some crazy guy to command the Psychics.--Akiza Izayoi 00:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

• Sayer's "unfortunate" death is so epic.Scizor99 00:31, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

I pity the fool as in Sayer. Fallensilence 02:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

• Oh we all know Sayer was trying to have Akiza to himself because he wanted to do "things" with her--Yugioh DED 02:43, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Dual Type

Does anyone think Konami should introduce duel monsters with two types at once?Scizor99 00:32, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

• Heck no. The whole double attribute thing on Light and Darkness Dragon and Dark Simorgh already gives us enough headaches when it comes to rulings. Zeroblizzard 00:38, June 17, 2010 (UTC)Zeroblizzard

You mean like Beast-Warriors?--Akiza Izayoi 00:39, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

No, I mean like making Jinzo both a Machine and Psychic Type.Scizor99 00:49, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

that would be coolHouseholdCatDeity 00:51, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

I hope you realize that that's already been done.

But not on real lifeHouseholdCatDeity 01:32, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Lmao "fungus". What if they made Lamp-Type?....................................I'm just sayin'--Yugioh DED 02:06, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Virus-Type will be great since Seto use that in manga

I think that virus types should be like psychics except it destroys monsters. That'll be different but awesome. 69.110.156.123 05:37, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Now I'm not sure about this. It could go bad as I see it already. Fallensilence 05:38, June 17, 2010 (UTC)