Forum:Rebirth of the Burn

Monsters (15): Guardian Sphinx
Penguin Soldier x3
Honest
Fire Princess x2
Dancing Fairy x2
Des Koala x2
Stealth Bird
Lava Golem
Marshmallon
Neo-Spacian Grand Mole

Spell (10):
Dark Hole
Wave Motion Cannon x3
Chain Energy x3
Spring of Rebirth x2
Level Limit Area B

Traps (15):
Curse of Darkness x3
Ordeal of a traveler x2
Gravity Bind
Begone, Knave!
Ojama Trio x2
Life Absorbing Machine
Compulsitory Evacuation Device x3
Ultimate Offering
Magical Hats

Total: 40

Notes: This deck can pull off an OTK with fire princess, honest, spring of rebirth and ultimate offering; however I did'nt want this to be the main strategy of the deck. The deck focuses mostly on returning cards to players hands, especially my opponent's monsters. The LP gain from spring of rebirth is a nice bonus and even better when paired with fire princess but more importantly it forces the opponent to replay the same cards over and over at cost due to chain energy and curse of darkness. My opponent will definitely think twice before playing a spell card when it costs over 1000 LP to play. Tell me what you think of the strategy and any ideas you have that can improve the deck. Please don't try to make it an OTK deck built around fire princess (it's just a support card in the deck). Does this deck have what it takes to compete in this format?

• Not a chance. Burn has been too slow to compete in any format for a long time. Your deck requires too many combo pieces. You'll be at 0 LP before you draw into all of them. Not only that, but common cards like BRD wrecks Stall and you have absolutely nothing to protect you from that.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 18:51, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

• Guess what, you ASKED whether or not your deck was competitive and I gave you an answer. You not getting the answer you want doesn't mean you have the right to delete it. And I'm the idiot? Even though YOU missed the clear flaw that I gave for your deck. I'm going to let you find it. It's people like you that shouldn't bother posting your decks here, because you don't know how to take onboard any form of criticism. It's pathetic. If you don't want opinions, don't post your decks.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 11:59, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

• Also, Burn sucking isn't just "my opinion." It's a fact. Just because you run it doesn't make it good. If you'd like me to prove it by firstly providing at least 10 different valid reasons why it sucks, and secondly, pounding your so called OTK deck with any of the current competitive decks, let me know.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:02, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

? I didn't delete anything. In fact I really appreciated your advice.

• It wasn't you? Some another anon did it. I'd recommend getting a user account, since it's hard to differentiate anons.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 18:48, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Well, Yami just as a tip, check the Edits History next time. You can just revert the edit made, and check if it was the exact Anon. And to original poster, please use a Template: Decklist, plus its a good idea to create an account. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk Ω) 20:35, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Also why do you have an Honest? I can only see 1 Light monster. And what kind of Burn were you going for? Was it just a random assortment of Burn type cards? See Burn Deck, cause there are bunch. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk Ω) 20:38, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

"This deck can pull off an OTK with fire princess, honest, spring of rebirth and ultimate offering; however I did'nt want this to be the main strategy of the deck."-Resk (✩) 20:39, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Doesn't that seem a little inconstant? Also what's up with the different IP sigs? One was the deleter, one was the original poster, and the last was the one who said he found Yami's comments helpful. Were you using different comps? --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk Ω) 20:43, July 14, 2011 (UTC)