Forum:Should Metalsilver Armor be banned or limited?
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Lists Discussion → Should Metalsilver Armor be banned or limited? Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5467 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Due to the power of the armor being able to cut off a lot of cards that target (Whether its spells, traps, or monster effects/cards from anywhere), it seems to cripple a lot of decks, causing the opposer to be unable to do anything.
- No, because you could just use Heavy Storm, Mystical Space Typhoon, or Dust Tornado. --Bluedog (Talk) 00:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with the guy before me. Also I haven't seen that many decks that would have a card that would target 1 monster on the field so it would be a waste of card in my opinion. There are many strategies involving cards that will just destroy everything or other ways to get rid of them. --Xsamuraizx 05:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Way more cards nowadays dont even target so things like metal silver armor doesnt offer as much protection as you might think. Shit nlike Honest or shuria (think thats the right blackwing) dont need targets
Or hell i'll just mention a few staples like Lightening vortex or judgment dragon also dont (dad does but then you could just destroy the spell card first) Steelfallenangel 18:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
