Forum:Stardust Vs Stardust

Can Stardust Dragon negate the effect of Stardust Dragon as it says on the card "negate the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, and destroy that card."

YubelFTW 20:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

---

Yes. ATEMVEGETA 20:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you highlighted 'destroy'. If you negate Stardust with another Stardust, your opponent's Stardust is off the field anyway. (It's the same deal as if you used it to negate Exiled Force). The effect is negated, but the opponent's monster is already off the field. Danny Lilithborne 01:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

He highlighted that to emphasize that Stardust itself does destroy. If it weren't for that one word, Stardust could not negate a Stardust. --TerraGamerX 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

So yeah, here's a scenario:

Player 1 activates Raigekei Break > Player 2 activates Star Dust Dragon's effect > Player 1 activates Star Dust Dragon's effect to negate Star Dust Dragons effect that was supposed to negate AND DESTROY the effect of Raigeki Break.

You can't destroy effects. The *card* is destroyed, which is generally pointless since S/Ts get sent to the graveyard after they resolve, but may be important for some effects, such as an opposing "Stardust Dragon". Danny Lilithborne 21:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

But the Return of the Negated Stardust Dragon...

I have a question to that. Now if one Stardust negates the other, will the negated Stardust return to the field be it's second effect or did the other Stardust negate it's effect leaving it in the graveyard?

• The Stardust Dragon whose effect was negated will not be special summoned during the End Phase. --Darth Covah 19:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)