Forum:Switch control when synchro summon
Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → Switch control when synchro summon Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
This forum thread has been unedited for 4643 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
187.153.231.184 (talk) 20:00, September 4, 2011 (UTC) what happpen when either player synchro summon a monster with an optional trigger effect like trishula's effect and activates its effect then the other player chain the effect whit a card that would change the control of the monster like tuner's scheme or enemy controler? when the effect resolve who player select the cards to remove? does the monster lose his time to activate the eff? 187.153.231.184 (talk) 20:00, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
- If you're meaning that your opponent activate "Tuner's Scheme" or "Enemy Controller" in the chain to your Synchro Summon? Well, the resolve would do the work - whatever last will be always first. --FredCat 20:07, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
ALdo Espinoza (talk • contribs) 01:02, September 5, 2011 (UTC)no that i triying to say is what happen when i summon a monster when a effect that trigger when the monster is summoned like a gadget, machina gearframe, boggar knight, marauding, etc. and my oponent chain with a card and change the control of that monster to his self who player will take the effect of the monster the who that summon it? or the new controler?ALdo Espinoza (talk • contribs) 01:02, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- The resolved is the backward of chain process; If the last thing is the effect that activate on Synchro Summon, it will still be a former controller. Since that effect was already activate and you declared a target; same reason when my opponent summoned "Caius the Shadow Monarch" and targeted my "Naturia Beast" - tried to banish him, I chained to his effect with my "Spiritual Earth Art - Kurogane", traded Beast for "Serene Psychic Witch" - which my opponent missed his chance to shoot down. --FredCat 01:59, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Player active effect of his monster, not the monster itself. So they player active effect will resolve the eff, not the new controller.--Lê (talk • contribs) 02:13, September 5, 2011 (UTC)