Talk:Ancient Fairy Dragon (character)

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Merging AFD (WC10) and (character)[edit]

Shouldn't this be on the Ancient Fairy Dragon (character) article? It's the same creature, but being used non-canonically. Or do people think we should start giving separate character articles to characters in different continuities? (e.g. w:c:marvel:Peter Parker (Earth-616) and w:c:marvel:Peter Parker (Earth-1610)) -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:53, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea. --Blue (Talk) 20:29, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
The second one? -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:55, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah (sorry for not being specific the first time). --Blue (Talk) 00:02, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Look, Ancient Fairy Dragon plays a major role in the anime, and it seems it'll probably stay the same for a while. Ancient Fairy Dragon in the video game is not a big deal. Maybe it would be a bit confusing when editing the anime character article. Also, truth is that separate Deck articles are used for each one of the anime protagonists, and that as well made me link to a separate article. I'm not saying I mind merging the articles, and personally I wouldn't like separate character articles so much, unless it's really necessary. I just find it less confusing, that's all.Lon3wolf 01:25, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
If you don't like the idea of seperate character articles, how come you gave this one? o_O If it was intended as just an extension to the main article, like those Deck pages, I don't think it should be using a character infobox or be put in character categories and should probably be called "Ancient Fairy Dragon in Reverse of Arcadia". But in my opinion such articles should only exist if the content is too long for the main article. e.g. Seto Kaiba in the manga. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:45, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Well, the content of Ancient Fairy Dragon in the anime is too long if we consider the main article as the one having the WC10 character, right? XD I totally agree with you, but I was thinking it in reverse order. Anyway, if you don't like how I did it, you're free to correct it or tell me to correct it myself. =) Lon3wolf 19:02, April 19, 2010 (UTC)