Talk:Possess
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Possess. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Xyz Material[edit]
I'm guessing Xyz Material would not be included in this? -Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 17:14, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
- They're part of the Xyz Monster, so if you're referring to that of Xyz Material not being possessing directly, then yes, that's correct - since it's not a card on the field, but a orbit of the Xyz Monster itself. In order to possessing it; possessing the Xyz Monster. --iFredCat 17:19, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
Buster Blader, the Dragon Destroyer Swordsman[edit]
The last time I got on Dueling Network, I summoned Buster Blader, the Dragon Destroyer Swordsman in a duel against a friend. I told him Dragons on his field, in hand, and Graveyard can't activate their effects since this card's text states "also Dragon-Type monsters in your opponent's possession cannot activate their effects".
I read this article well, but was I correct in saying to him that dragons in his hand and Graveyard, as well as that he controlled, couldn't activate their effects since I controlled Buster Blader, the Dragon Destroyer Swordsman? Or should it have been only Dragons he controlled? I'm still not entirely sure after reading this article.--Cyber Dragon (Talk) (Contributions) 17:00, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that is literally the clearest definition for "possession" there is. Keep in mind that this page has a citation to where the definition is stated in the official rulebook; if you read it there, it may make more sense in context. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:45, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
- I own and have read several copies of official rulebooks that come with structure decks. The first time in memory that I've ever seen "in your opponent's possession" mentioned in a monster's effect instead of "your opponent controls" is with Buster Blader, the Dragon Destroyer Swordsman.--Cyber Dragon (Talk) (Contributions) 19:03, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
- It's understandable if you've never seen the term before, since the term is relatively new. Just so long as you checked the rulebook link, then you should be fine. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 19:14, March 7, 2016 (UTC)