User talk:2A03:1B20:3:F011:0:0:0:E413

What gives me the right is being an admin and our general policy of only creating series pages if the group is relevant on its own. The "Virtuous" cards are a small set of members of the "Dogmatika" archetype and are not meant (nor able) to be played alone at all, so a page for themselves is unnecessary when they can just be described as part of that theme. --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 16:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Counterargument:

Risebell

2A03:1B20:3:F011:0:0:0:E413 (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Furthermore, Cartesia and Incredible Ecclesia are not part of the Dogmatika archetype, and are only related in terms of lore, which is what this series is supposed to represent. :2A03:1B20:3:F011:0:0:0:E413 (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Risebell monsters are not part of any larger theme, they're standalone, that's why they have a page.

As for Cartesia & Incredible, I admit I forgot about that and its a fair point, but its still debatable whether that makes it truly relevant as a series. They're still not meant to be a Deck of their own, and we generally don't tie together cards from different archetypes like this unless they're the actually the focus of the story, like the Visas-related Field Spells. The Virtuous monsters are just a group of in-story characters that happen to share some stats and some card designed decided to reference in a couple of effects, theres isn't much to say about them as a whole other than paraphrasing the official Albaz lore. Hell, we were even debating whether Albaz Dragons deserve their own page or should be merged with the "Branded" archetype.

--XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 16:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Based on the page for Series, I concluded that it was appropriate. To quote that page: "A series is a group of cards with similar name, artwork, and/or effect design, but do not have a single shared name string that is supported by a card effect that are present in archetypes.". This applies for all of the "Virtuous" cards in my opinion. At the very least some discussion on the page could have been made before removing it. 2A03:1B20:3:F011:0:0:0:E413 (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)