User talk:Crab Helmet

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia, feel free to ask me if you have doubts. You may also like to take a look to our FAQ if you have questions. --Dragon Slayer (Contribs • Count) 04:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Why hallo thar. --Pizzaman 11:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

OMG[edit]

OMG RANDOM PARSON!! SaintKiwi 11:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Saint Kiwi

Response...[edit]

Response to:"...Also, with regard to your edit to the "Tips" page, I don't know why reading the card would be too difficult for you, since anyone who actually reads this card can tell that it is not a Cyberdark monster. Just because you've named yourself after Cyberdark Edge doesn't mean that you need to pretend that ever card int he game is Cyberdark Edge.--Crab Helmet 14:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)"--I dont know where you get off interpreting that superfluous statement, about how I think everything is Cyberdark... who the heck thinks everything is Cyberdark? It's called nickname. Just like yesterday...It was given to me as a gift since my brother knew I had a dragon deck and if we think with your logic, then I can interpret that you think everything taste like Crab sweaty Helmet, dont lick the keyboard! lol!...But really. Which Tip page are you talking about that Im saying its a Cyberdark monster? I dont recall naming something cyberdark.--CyberDarkEdge 16:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry Crab Helmet, but my discussion article on Heroes wasn't finished. I had to cut it short that day, and I didn't expect anyone to read it so soon, considering I was the first editor to start that page. I still had more input reguarding the pros and cons of Fusing Cards that remeove monsters from play and a few other things. I'd like an opinion when I'm done. Hopefully I have managed to finish that article by the end of the day I wrote this paragraph--Dragonking 21:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to the Crystal Beast Deck wasn't bad, but was still inappropriate, sorry--Kid Eternity

Deck suggestion lists[edit]

You seem to seem to have a good idea of what's worthwile and what's not, so you should go ahead and do what you like with the lists of cards on the deck pages, rather than ask on the talk pages first each time. -- Deltaneos 20:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Tips/Decks issues[edit]

What happens here is people take one of their favourite cards or Archetype. Stick Deck at the end, see we don't have that page. So they start it and post their deck ideas. Usually the page does not contain a deck strategy, but a list of tips concerning the card. (very bad tips as you've pointed out.) So yeah, yeah, they need removing, deleting etc.

I agree with pretty much everything you've been saying, but you have to remember not everyone that edits here is good at the game and a lot of them don't know every rule, so while you would be right to remove their bad/incorrect material, you don't need to come down so hard on them for not knowing certain things. -- Deltaneos 13:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Yo.[edit]

...pssssssst, hey!... I have to ask... why is your name Crab Helmet? Land_of_dogs

Sorry[edit]

I must humbly apologize for yelling at you on the Hero Deck talk page. We've been getting trolls from pojo.com here recently, and they really, REALLY hate Heroes. I'm afraid I mistook you for one of them. I realize now you were just trying to make the deck a page of strategies rather than a list. I'm very sorry. Rodtheanimegod4ever 04:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

BEHOLD![edit]

1. There is a way. 2. Your name is awesome.


ceasefire[edit]

  • I ment his deck not all decks. -- Dragon of chaos 22:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Its a cool card anyway. Well, I'm not here for that, please don't be mean or aggresive with your messages, not everyone is an expert at Yu-Gi-Oh!. --Dragon Slayer (Contribs • Count) 00:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Well[edit]

I noticed you have a good idea of how rulings work, and there was one that has been bugging other users and I. But because Konami has not made notice of this yet, tell me, in your opinion do you think cards like King of the Swamp and Volcanic Rocket can use their effects to get cards such as Super Polymerization and Tri-Blaze Accelerator (respectfully). Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 21:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Thank you. Now lets say King of the swamp did mean "Fusion", would konami have to remake "Dark Fusion" to say "Dark Polymerization" or do think it would be like archfiends where they say "screw it, it's considered dark polymerization"? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 23:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

hey[edit]

Hey man we got off on the wrong foot but I don't have any hard feelings tword you so do you have any hard feelings? -- Dragon of chaos 14:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Ban DAD?[edit]

  • I think it would be far less broken @ 1. ^.^ Danny Lilithborne 09:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Bans[edit]

Interesting and very reasonable list (Unlimited ToK for the win), though I'd advise putting Exodia and at least two of the Cyber Dragon fusions at 1, because banning them basically kills two entire deck themes which, honestly, would do the game more harm than any individual card could Rodtheanimegod4ever 13:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

    • Thanks for the explanations and they're very reasonable. If I could offer a suggestion, since you seem to be on the fence with Exodia, Limit DE and AK and put Exodia back at 1. Killing Exodia would make many people Not Happy. Also, I'd suggest making a better definition for Forbidden than "ZOMG SHUD NEVER BEEN MADE." Makes you sound like one of those ban-obsessed Pojo dorks. Rodtheanimegod4ever 20:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
      • I agree that they can be bad for the game, but you said they should never have been made, which I take offense to. It's not very clear, perhaps you could word it better, for instance, "cards that upset the balance of the game"? And maybe I'm just biased when it comes to Exodia, he's been my favorite card for ages, but even Konami has to throw the players a bone once in a while. Exodia is one of the very oldest deck themes, and it would certainly hurt more players that it would help to ban it. It's like ending Spider-man's marriage. You just can't do it without repercussions. Guess what's the most reviled Spidey storyline to date? Rodtheanimegod4ever 00:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

...[edit]

Just to tell you you forgot Neo-Spacian Glow Moss as a Direct Attacker under conditions. Also, I'm against the CED and CTD ban. Come on, they're not THAT powerfull !!! Rayqui 18:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

... (again)[edit]

Sorry for the error above ^^" // Why should Metamorphosis be unbanned ??? OoRayqui 18:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Multi attackers[edit]

Monster Reborn[edit]

Miraculous Rebirth?


Suggestions[edit]

Hope I help.Dark Pride 08:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Answer :[edit]

  • Sure, there is a lot of cool monster to summon with Metamorphosis... Fiend Skull Dragon, Dark Balter the Terrible, Reapper on the Nightmare, Cyber Blader, Gatling Dragon... But it's also one of the only way to Summon Cyber End Dragon, as you can't use any Fusion Subsitute Monster. But I must admit I'd rather Summon it with Power Bond, no matter how many turns passes before I have 3 Cyber Dragon (or 3 Cyber-Proto on the field).
  • By the way, Gyroid sure be at least Semi-Limited, due to the combo with The Dark Door.

Destruction by battle[edit]

I'm not sure what you count but do Gellenduo and Gyroid Count? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 19:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Multi Attackers[edit]

Where is Tyrant Dragon? --Rein Weiss Ritter 19:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Guess who...[edit]

  • You're wrong. You can't use Fusion Subsitute Monster to Fusion Summon Cyber End Dragon (see Card Rulings:Cyber End Dragon, neither from Cyber Twin Dragon. But, you can use The Light - HSF ON THE FIELD with 1 (wich isn't difficult due to Cyber Dragon's effect) or 2 Cyber Dragons if you're attempting to summon CED, which isn't that easy !!
  • Anyway, just tell me HOW are you gonna use Metamorphosis if it's unbanned while CED and CTD are forbidden. Especially with Yubel and Metal Reflect Slime that you quote.
  • And Semi-Limiting a monster isn't that stupid. It reduces the chances to draw/use it. Take Marauding Captain as an example. With 2 of those on the field, it was impossible to attack. It was Semi-Limited once. Cyber Dragon itself is Semi-Limited, because of it's effect (easy Tribute for Monarchs, Jinzo, etc...) : if it was Limited, nobody would use it and the REAL Cyber Dragon deck user (I mean, with the Cyber Barrier Dragon and/or the Cyber Laser Dragon, for guys who really loves it) and if it was Unlimited, everybody would !! Same for D-Hero Malicious, Light and Darkness Dragon, Nobleman of Crossout (well, it WAS Semi before Limited) , etc...
  • Besides, I find it stupid to create cards to restrict them later, like Black Luster Soldier - EotB, Witch of the Black Forest, Cyber Jar, Makyura the Destructor, Call of the Haunted, Time Seal... while there's way to counter them. I belive it reduces the gameplay, and today, where I live, I only see 2 kinds of deck : E-Hero/Neo-Spacians (young people, easy to defeat) deck and Monarchs/Cyber Dragon/Spell Striker (too predicatble) ones. Too bad.
  • I hope you understand my point of view. Rayqui 22:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • NB : Monster Reborn is Limited !!! HOORAY ! and, by the way, you forgot Graceful Dice and Skull Dice as Dice Rolling Cards.

Banned List[edit]

Hey man I like your banned list, but why ban Premature Burial? Please respond soon and ban Darklord Zerato just wondering well bye. -- Dragon of chaos 01:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


Again[edit]

  • Again, using Light's effect on the field is not an easy thing, even for CTD. Why ? A lot of ways to counter it. Divine Wrath, Trap Hole (when summoning it), Skill Drain, etc... Don't worry, I read and understand your post.
  • I still don't understand how you're going to use Metamorphosis, as, unless you got Yubel - The Ultimate Nightmare on your side of the field, you can't summon the 3 strongest Fusion Monsters (BEUD, Dragon Master Knight, and Five-Headed Dragon, level 12 monsters).
  • Sure, the fact that CD isn't DARK is ONE OF THE reasons, but this means it'll be used again when LODT comes out, because it's a LIGHT monster, which is illogical.
  • You may be right about the Semi-Limited thing.
  • Take Breaker. Take Sinister Serpent, which ban is useless with the ban of Tribe-Infecting Virus, or Yata-Garasu which seems ridiculous now that CED - EofE is Forbidden. Now, if thoses cards were unbanned, they would be unable to "damage the game".
  • NO point of view is wrong. Any point of view is pretty much right. I respect yours, I don't think it's totally right either.
  • Already ther... Crap, I really need be more careful. And, for Nerfed card of Pot of Greed, may I suppose Alien Grey or Battery Man - Button Cell ? and, for Monster Reborn, Book of Life ? Rayqui 09:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
    • When I wrote "Trap Hole", it was to NEGATE THE SUMMON of The Light. Anyway, Bottomless Trap Hole can negate any Fusion Summon, and sadly there isn't any restrictions on this card. :(
    • Yes, I know. Fiend Skull Dragon is one of my favorite. But if you have better examples, feel free to share your knowledge with me.
    • I don't think I'll like the Lightsworns cards. I think they'll be overused, like for the 6 Samourais or Monarch Cards.
    • With Metamorphosis unbanned and unlimited CDs, what about a Forbidden CED, a Limited CTD, or those 2 cards Unlimited but reprinted with an additional rule : "This card cannot be Special Summoned, except by Fusion Summon" ? I believe this would be the best, but the less realistic, solution.
    • Chaos Sorcerer then. Tsukuyomi, Last Will, or Last Turn. By the way, I think The World should be include in your Limited List.
    • No point of view is totally wrong as long as you have arguments to defend it. For example, I can say that Larvae Moth is one of the most useful card as for Discard Cost, trap for Nobleman of Crossout, on any Insect-Themed deck... as I can say that D-Hero Plasma (one of my favorite card, in fact) is an useless card that can be countered too easily, for example by MST when eqquiped, Bottomless Trap Hole, or Shadow-Imprisonning Mirror.
    • Oooookaaaaayyyy... So, I don't think you count Detonator Circle "A" as a nerferd Destruction Ring... By the way, Hero Barrier doesn't DESTROY attacking monsters but only NEGATE attack, like... Negate Attack ^^. Anyway, congrats for this hard work. Rayqui 16:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Justification[edit]

Your justification for CoTH is mis-pasted. --Pizzaman 04:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

One of those "ban list" posts again[edit]

I really didn't want to annoy you with anymore of these "but why is XXXXX on your list?" type questions. But this isn't really a question, but more like a suggestion.
Shouldn't Destiny End Dragoon be included in the list? After all, it's a Ring of Destruction limited to your opponent only, and unlike Cyber End, it doesn't even need to enter the battle phase to cause harm. If Metamorphosis was to come back, this will surely cause some damage. The only thing that balances this out is a lack of commonly used LV10 monsters, but there's a chance of people using Metal Reflect Slime. --Pizzaman 12:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Even with morph, there isnt many targets. Yubel I think is probably the only decent one. Ive been working on decks to fuse him, but he still takes effort to get out. Unless we get morph back, I think hes fine for the timebeing. With it back, there will be ways of just speeding it out with Tomato and Yubel. Yami 13:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

BAAACK !![edit]

  • I didn't know it. It's like Monarchs' effect, in fact. This is obvious. Really. >.<
  • I'll wrote to UDE for they do some new CTD/CED edition like that. XD
  • ... so they become predictable and easy to counter, until a new theme comes. And again.
  • I'd rather use Gatling Dragon with Revoke Fusion. Gatling's effect is too dangerous if your opponent doesn't have enough monster on his field. Anyway, by using 2 Revoke, you can Fusion Summon Gatling with Overload Fusion (under the condition to have 3 of it in your Fusion Deck).
  • The Light Rulershould be banned too. By the way, I'm disappointing it isn't released in hte TCG version of LODT.
  • There is cards that can shuffle your face-down card. Anyway, it's better for a discard cost. "The universe isn't communist", fortunately, and I admit some arguments are better than others. Having a point of view without arguments, only because Mr.Everybody says it, is actually like a hand without the hand.
  • Sadly, I don't see Emergency Provisions on your nerf list. There is cards based on it, like Gryphon's Feather Duster or Mystik Wok (for monsters...). There must be other cards, but I'm not on it actually, I've just realised I got the only one French Evil Hero Wild Cyclone, and probably the only Evil Hero Malicious Fiend buyed in a booster pack. I'm enjoy it right now. By the way, shouldn't Dark Gaia be Limited ? I mean to restrict summoning EHDG with EHDG as a Fusion Material... It's just an idea. Rayqui 15:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Anyway, as long as cards exist to counter the HSF monsters, using their effects reveals to be harder than usual. ^^
    • All is about how you present it, the arguments, etc.
    • Like today, where I live, lots of people (kids, so cute seein them crying when they lose XD) use an E-Hero /N-Spacian decks. I personally E-Hero decks are goods, but I prefer E(vil)-Hero ones.
    • I had it once. I exchanged it to Armed Dragon LV3/5/7 (C/C/UR). Now I regret it :(.
    • Many cards can help AFEX-TLR to be Summoned, as for Plasma or the Wicked Gods (shouldn't the Avatar and the Dreadroot be banned ?), like Gilasaurus, The Shallow Grave, Infernal Prodigy, CD, etc... by the way, I'm surprised to see Dark Support monster in LODT. It proves that Dark Army never dies.
    • It's all about the difference betwenn proof and argument, which is not that obvious... the proof is an argument while the argument isn't a proof.
    • By the way, can you cumulate the effect of 2 or more Infernal Gainer/Double Attack ? (I'm loving the French name of D-End Dragon : "Soldat Dragon de l'Ultime Destinée", which translates to "Dragon Soldier of Ultimate Destiny".
    • While I'm on it, what kind of deck do you carry ? Mine is on my user page. Rayqui 21:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
      • They must be effects or cards that CANNOT be countered... Forbidden ones ?
      • Oh. Thanks a lot, now I'm pretty sure they will ignore me. XD
      • Sadly, most of E-Hero player run this kind of deck. Screw Neos, viva Phoenix Enfoncer !!
      • Well, in fact, Revoke Fusion was MY way to Summon CED by Chimeratech... was it legal, at least ?
      • C'mon, PTDN had good, powefull, deadly, unpredicatble, swarming cards. Anuway, long life to the Ruler !!!
      • But some proof can be an argument too !
      • Ok. Discussion here seems to be closed. ^^
      • Summoning REBMD is one of the most frustrating thing ever. Does it means you carry a REBD deck ? I would like to create a Ogre Powerup/Death deck. I'm actually on it, thinking about cards needed, etc etc. Rayqui 12:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree that the The Wicked Avatar should be banned but why would you ban Cup of Aceif it is a terrible card? -- Dragon of chaos 22:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
    • You can restrict your opponent of drawing, retry with Second Coin Toss, etc... Plus, Jar of Greed should be Limited. Rayqui 12:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
        • How. Well, that's impressive cards. I love Super Polymeriaztion. ^^
        • Sadly, I send them a letter. And crap, who tries nothing gets nothing. Or something like that.
        • Was this ironic ?
        • Oh sh*t. And by Dimensional Explosion ?
        • I personnaly like those cards. And screw the Lightsworms !!
        • So nothing, I forgot why we talk about this XD
        • I actually got a REBMD. I like it. In the deck I use currently, my strongest Nomi monster is Cyber Laser Dragon. What are the others cards on your deck ? Rayqui 18:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

hello[edit]

I'm adding to the message above if Jar of Greed is restricted than Legacy of Yata-Garasu should be restricted to and if you could take a look at my deck and give me some advice that would be great and please be nice about it thank!! -- Dragon of chaos 17:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Your Posts[edit]

Please tone down the fierceness of your posts and edit comments. Pojo.biz is already full of such attitude, and I do not want it transferring it here. Yes, people are annoying, but you can be clear and concise, whilst still being professional.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 00:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Multi Attackers Again[edit]

Fossil Warrior Skullking is also an "attack again", and Grasschopper is another "attack all".


Nerfed[edit]

Hey just wondering would Destiny Hero - Disk Commander be a nerfed Pot of Greed? just because it lets you draw to cards. I's a far guess but I thought it mite be. -- Dragon of chaos 04:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

bans again[edit]

So I looked at your user page and your banned list and there is something missing. Why don't you have Judgment Dragon in your banned list!! I mean come on easy summoning conditions and f*cking devastating effect and 3000 Atk it has to be banned. -- Dragon of chaos 15:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


And why do you have Megamorph banned? -- Dragon of chaos 01:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

  • you may think I am stupid for thinking this would work but I need to know and you know all sorts of sh*t so I thought I would ask. If I tribute two Hand of Nephthys can I summon two Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys or just one? -- Dragon of chaos 19:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • If you have two other monsters to Tribute as well, sure. But, you can chain their effects to each other, so if you just have 2 Hand of Nephthys, you can still only Special Summon 1 Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 19:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


Overdoing it a bit[edit]

Isn't allowing 3 torrential tributes and 3 Future Fusions a bit too powerful? And you missed out Roadrunner in the Immune to Destruction by Battle under certain conditions section. -- Wertylegend 11:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Nerfed 2 + Immune[edit]

I think Book of Moon is a nerfed version of Tsukuyomi. And you can add the Immune to Spells and Immune to Traps sections. --Rein Weiss Ritter 17:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Perfect field[edit]

I noticed you just added two new sections, and I was wondering, have you ever thought of adding a "Perfect Field"(cards that will stop all opponent effects like Horus, Royal Decree, etc.) or do you think that should be it's own page? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 20:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Guardian Kay'est[edit]

hi crab helmet...u forgot Guardian Kay'est for "Attack Target Controllers" (umm...is this where monsters that cannot be attacked go under?) and "Immune to Spells". -- pinOi32 8:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


cup of ace[edit]

you said that Cup of Ace should be banned however I don't see it there, also you still have not added Judgment Dragon that I can see. Correct me if i'm wrong. -- Dragon of chaos 15:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Indestructible by Battle[edit]

I didn't see any Cloudians here, most of them are immune to battle destruction. Rainyday2012 00:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Control switchers/See also[edit]

Effect Type Database and Semmantic MediaWiki[edit]

Hi. We're currently doing a project similar to the one on your user page. (ie. piercing, contol switcers etc.) By adding values like this... 

|search1 = Elemental Heroes
|search2 = Nomi
|search3 = Cannot be Destroyed by Battle
|search4 = 2 Fusion Materials

to card articles, the user shoud be able to look them by going to the bottom of the page where it says Facts about Elemental Hero Shining Phoenix Enforcer. The user can look up a listing of cards that cannot be destroyed by battle.

You just seem genuinely interested in this, so I'm letting you know if you want to help/discuss improvement.

There are more tricks you might useful like combining values to automatically create tables;

For example: 

{{ #ask:
  [[Search::Charmer]] [[Search::Change Control]]
  |? ATK
  |? DEF
  |? Level
  |? Type
  |? Attribute
}}

Gives:


I understand it may look difficult, but I'm sure you'll manage to understand it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Direct attackers[edit]

Clarification[edit]

"／Buster" was only used because /Buster caused sub-pages to be created. This is solved by using [[:/Busters|/Buster]].--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 21:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Direct attackers[edit]

Hi, about nerfed replacements, you missed out wall of thorns as a nerfed mirror force

Wall of Thorns - Activate only when a face-up Plant-Type monster you control is selected as an attack target. Destroy all Attack Position monsters your opponent controls.--71.135.180.218 03:41, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://yugipedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Crab_Helmet&oldid=3909059"