Difference between revisions of "Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion)
(rm old stray signature)
 
(173 intermediate revisions by 61 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Yu-Gi-Oh! Lists Discussion|sticky=yes}}
+
{{Forum/header|Yu-Gi-Oh! Lists Discussion|sticky=yes}}
  
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
 
{| border="1" style="margin:auto;" cellspacing="0" class="box colored type-character"
 
|-
 
! colspan=2 class="mainheader lightheader" | Key:
 
|-
 
| &nbsp;=&nbsp;
 
| &nbsp;It should stay where it is. &nbsp;
 
|-
 
| &nbsp;↑&nbsp;
 
| &nbsp;Chances are, it would become more Limited. &nbsp;
 
|-
 
| &nbsp;↓&nbsp;
 
| &nbsp;Chances are, it would become less Limited. &nbsp;
 
|-
 
| &nbsp;-&nbsp;
 
| &nbsp;Not sure / Please [[#Discussion|discuss below on what should go in these]]. &nbsp;
 
|-
 
| &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
| &nbsp;In the Forbidden List, the chance of them coming off the Forbidden list is in order of Low, Very Low, Never. &nbsp;
 
|}
 
  
 
== List ==
 
== List ==
 +
<!--Do not update this List with position changes until those changes into effect, even if they are revealed earlier.-->
  
 
* From the creator of the "[[Forum:List_of_cards_to_side_in_to_cripple_meta_decks|List of cards to side in to cripple meta decks]]", comes the...
 
* From the creator of the "[[Forum:List_of_cards_to_side_in_to_cripple_meta_decks|List of cards to side in to cripple meta decks]]", comes the...
  
 
<div align=right>[{{fullurl:Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/List|action=edit}} Edit the list]</div>
 
<div align=right>[{{fullurl:Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/List|action=edit}} Edit the list]</div>
{{/List}}
+
{{Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/List}}
  
 
: '''In case someone somehow missed it. Click "Show" on the right side of the bar.'''
 
: '''In case someone somehow missed it. Click "Show" on the right side of the bar.'''
Line 34: Line 15:
 
: '''This list can also assist people before posting a prediction on the next banlist.'''
 
: '''This list can also assist people before posting a prediction on the next banlist.'''
 
: '''Please help out by pointing out changes that should be made in the list (if any) (please include reasons).'''
 
: '''Please help out by pointing out changes that should be made in the list (if any) (please include reasons).'''
: '''Keep in mind that the TCG banlist is exactly the same as the OCG banlist (minus the OCG exclusives). So, reasons should be based on the OCG rulings.''' (adding a note to those would be appreciated, something like the one on Victory Dragon.)
+
:  
 
: And for those who are wondering. No, I didn't make this list recently. It been on 2 other forums before. This is the most updated version of it as the other 2 aren't being updated.
 
: And for those who are wondering. No, I didn't make this list recently. It been on 2 other forums before. This is the most updated version of it as the other 2 aren't being updated.
 
:: See also: [[Historic Forbidden/Limited Chart]]. {{User:Falzar_FZ/Sig}} 07:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)<br>
 
:: See also: [[Historic Forbidden/Limited Chart]]. {{User:Falzar_FZ/Sig}} 07:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)<br>
  
__TOC__[[Special:Contributions/69.124.5.7|69.124.5.7]] ([[User talk:69.124.5.7|talk]]) 15:57, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
+
__TOC__
  
 
= Discussion =
 
= Discussion =
 +
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 500px"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 500px"
 
|'''Archives:'''
 
|'''Archives:'''
 
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 1|1]]
 
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 1|1]]
 +
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 2|2]]
 +
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 3|3]]
 +
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 4|4]]
 +
|[[Forum:Reasons why cards are Forbidden/Limited/Archive 5|Current discussion page.]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
==March 2012==
 
So we now have news on the upcoming banlist. Do we update now, or wait till it actually takes effect? --[[User:Gadjiltron|Gadjiltron]] ([[User talk:Gadjiltron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gadjiltron|contribs]]) 05:53, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:I'm assuming we wait until it actually takes effect, for all we known Shriek might be wrong. It's unlikely but possible... And preferred.[[Special:Contributions/121.222.228.13|121.222.228.13]] ([[User talk:121.222.228.13|talk]]) 06:05, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Shouldn't the list be updated? Its march 2th (atleast for me) its supposed to take effect by now [[User:LaserGhost|LG]] [[User talk:LaserGhost|talk]] [[User:LaserGhost/Pesronal Guides|My own Guides]] 14:57, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:I was thinking about doing it but it's Falzar's forum and he usually does it. But, he get's really busy sometimes with other stuff and it's March now so I think I'll take care of it. This most recent list was really out there, so when I type up the reasons for where cards are on the list, it might be biased towards my opinion. So, if anyone ends up disagreeing with what I put, I won't care if they change it. I mostly just want to get it updated. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  19:49, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
I don't think [[Glow-Up Bulb]] was hit to hurt plants, I think it was just an indirect hit for them.<br>
 
Hitting it killed the First Turn Quasar [[Future Fusion]] deck that was insanely consistent, without GUB they have no targets to make [[Formula Synchron]] with. <br>
 
So yeah, maybe it wasn't because of Plants considering they weren't exactly top tier for a while, just my thoughts.<br>
 
[[Special:Contributions/123.211.144.181|123.211.144.181]] ([[User talk:123.211.144.181|talk]]) 05:08, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Yeah, but Spore got hit too, so I'm thinking Plants. I'll add the First Turn Quasar thing though. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  05:31, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Random off-topic question - does anybody else think that [[Mirage of Nightmare]] should be changed from "Never" to "Very Low?" Seriously, even [[Yata-Garasu]] is "Very Low." [[Special:Contributions/99.165.192.113|99.165.192.113]] ([[User talk:99.165.192.113|talk]]) 22:41, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:I was actually considering it when I was updating this earlier. I could see Mirage coming back at some point. I'm mostly sketchy on the fact that it could make Fableds and DW OP. I would like a little input from other people before changing this one. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  23:33, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Dark Worlds I could see being pretty good with it, I can't see Fableds being that great with it though. Sure it'd give them a boost but they'll need more than a boost to be able to compete with current decks.<br>
 
::And I'm not sure it'd be brought back. Does it help Xyz's at all? Nope. Less chance of it coming back.<br>
 
::[[Special:Contributions/123.211.144.181|123.211.144.181]] ([[User talk:123.211.144.181|talk]]) 01:33, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::I wasn't saying it has a very high likelihood of coming back, but wouldn't you agree it has at more of a chance of coming back than that annoying [[Yata-Garasu|freaking-crow-that-wins-games-on-its-own]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.165.192.113|99.165.192.113]] ([[User talk:99.165.192.113|talk]]) 01:53, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::Probably, but even so, I think a very low is needed at least. --<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Crimson Joker|<span style="color:Crimson;">Crimson </span><span style="color:Black">Joker</span>]] ([[User_talk:Crimson Joker|<span style="color:DarkSlateBlue;">Talk</span>]])</span> 04:40, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::::So, pretty much we agree Very Low for Mirage of Nightmare, correct? --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  09:46, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::::I think that at the very least, nobody is arguing against it. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.192.113|99.165.192.113]] ([[User talk:99.165.192.113|talk]]) 21:11, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Ok, is there anything else on there that anyone thinks should be changed? And also, maybe some discussion on some cards that are marked as "unsure" ( "-" )? --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  23:49, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Maybe [[Metamorphosis]] to "Very Low?" It has too many epic combos (derp, my [[Beast King Barbaros]] becomes [[Cyber Twin Dragon]] and my [[Metal Reflect Slime]] becomes [[Naturia Exterio]]). EDIT: Oh, and [[Formula Synchron]] to "=" I think, it's balanced at one. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.192.113|99.165.192.113]] ([[User talk:99.165.192.113|talk]]) 00:58, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Done and done. I put Formula as =, but with a chance of going ↓. With Glow-Up AND Fishborg gone, it's really not as broken. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  03:08, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::[[Fishborg Blaster]] to "Low?" As it says up there he is quite abusable, but also [[Fishborg Launcher]] was designed to be a nerfed replacement for him. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.192.113|99.165.192.113]] ([[User talk:99.165.192.113|talk]]) 11:18, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::With Laucher replacing Blaster, the odds of Blaster coming back are even slimmer. I'm gonna say Very Low. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  21:16, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Magical scientist should have his reason slightly edited, apart from the FTK he can perform with catapult turtle, he can also summon 4 xyz monsters by itself, which is obviously far too fast for this format.
 
 
[[User:Matthew Lightbody|[email protected]]] ([[User talk:Matthew Lightbody|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Matthew Lightbody|contribs]]) 21:38, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:I agree with you, and done. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  00:40, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Does anybody else think [[Snatch Steal]] should go to "Never" (sorry, update to end all updates)? IMO it's even worse than [[Change of Heart]] because even though it can't target face-downs to take control of, it offers control as long as it stays on the field, [[Hidden Armory]] can search/recycle it indiscriminately because you don't need to summon during a series of turns where you just steal your opponents monsters, and the opponent LP gain just doesn't matter. [[Special:Contributions/99.162.190.109|99.162.190.109]] ([[User talk:99.162.190.109|talk]]) 15:02, March 17, 2012 (UTC) P.S. - Hey, maybe Konami will errata [[Magical Scientist]] to say "up to twice per turn" and bring him back to promote Xyzs. Probably not.
 
 
:lol, I didn't mean it would be the '''last''' update. I meant it as it would be the last mass update for a while. As for Snatch Steal to "Never", I don't agree. 3 MSTs, Heavy Storm, [[Night Shot]] (actually really good), etc. It's just not gonna stay on the field. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  17:32, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Disregard Night Shot, I put that forgetting that it only destroys set S/T. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  17:28, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
: [[Snatch Steal]] is pretty bad. Most of my losses in Duel Academy (I know AI sucks) come from blowing all my cards to get ahead one powerful monster, than losing that monster next turn. While The card can be destroyed quite easily from MST, You should never use the card with the intention of keeping it on the field longer than a turn anyway. The "cost" of increasing your opponents life points is easily negated by saving it until your foe brings out the big guns and smashing him with his own ace. I don't know if Never is overkill, but it won't be coming down anytime soon. It would be balanced if it was limited to level 4 or lower cards maybe.[[User:ZGWolf|ZGWolf]] ([[User talk:ZGWolf|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ZGWolf|contribs]]) 20:29, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::You're absolutely right, it's not coming back soon, and it might never come back. But putting "Never" is definitely overkill. "Never" should be reserved for truly broken/poorly designed cards like [[Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End|CED]], [[Substitoad]], [[Imperial Order]], and [[Victory Dragon]] (because of the way surrendering works in the OCG). --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  21:34, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::Speaking of whom, IIRC, [[Victory Dragon]] is also banned, and never coming back, because you could sidedeck it in 3rd duel, even if you have 2 losses, the duel would be required to be played because it is "possible" that you will win the match, basically wasting everyone's time. [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.7|75.58.124.7]] ([[User talk:75.58.124.7|talk]]) 21:53, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::I don't think it works like that. If you have 2 losses, you '''lost''' the match and you don't get a chance to side. The match can't continue if a winner has been determined. But, the point is, Victory Dragon is never coming back either way. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  21:58, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
:::: actually of all the "broken" cards in the game, I think Victory dragon is the most likely to come back. It was a pain in the neck to actually summon, and is actully pretty weak. As wierd as it may sound, I am more afraid of snatch steal than victory dragon. Then again I don't do much  tourneys. Just wondering, were there any cases between release and ban where this card was actually used? Not that I actually want it, it's just really shiny 0_0
 
[[User:ZGWolf|ZGWolf]] ([[User talk:ZGWolf|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ZGWolf|contribs]]) 02:55, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::The reason Victory Dragon will not come back is because of the OCG. In the TCG, when your opponent drops VD, you can just surrender before they can damage you with it, so that they only win the round and not the full match. In the OCG, you may only surrender after the tenth turn. VD is worse now because it can be summoned easier than before. [[Hieratic]]s can drop it in a single turn, and possibly drop you to 0 that turn since they're so OTK oriented. It also may never come back just because it's the only Match Winner that isn't Illegal. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  03:03, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Topic conflict ==
 
 
I am now notice the mispurpose of "CURRENTLY BANNED" while there are like Limited and Semi-Limited including those recipes. So why not change the topic to "List of Reasons why cards are on the Currently Banlist" instead of "List of Reason why cards are Currently Banned"? So that can making a sense...? --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 00:49, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Oh, I see what you mean. We're not talking about just the banned stuff, we're talking about Semi-Limited and Limited stuff too, so the title is inaccurate. I agree in all honesty. What about "Reasons why cards are currently restricted" or "Reasons why cards are Banned/Limited"? Which sounds better? I don't think we need to say "List of..." in the title. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  01:04, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::I agree with changing, maybe "Which Cards are Restricted and Why"? [[Special:Contributions/99.162.190.109|99.162.190.109]] ([[User talk:99.162.190.109|talk]]) 01:00, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::This unregistered user has better topic choice - let's go with that! --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 01:02, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::I like it too, but I want a few different ideas out there to choose from before we decide what to change it to. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  01:04, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::Do we need to [[Summon|''invoking'']] some Admins to include some discusses with this? --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 01:10, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::::No, we don't ''have'' to. I'm just saying that we should throw a few more ideas out there for the new name. Like maybe "Reasons why cards currently on the Forbidden/Limited list" or something. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  01:14, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::::Ok, but I am still going with the one unregistered user made up, it suit this article better. --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 01:18, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::::::I'm thinking about going ahead and changing it now because the current title is just meh. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  17:32, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Trishula ==
 
 
Ok why does the reason of trishula say "her"? does trishula honestly look like a female to you? [[User:LaserGhost|LG]] [[User talk:LaserGhost|talk]] [[User:LaserGhost/Pesronal Guides|My own Guides]] 15:01, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Are you sexist against female dragons then? I'm not sure as to the answer myself, but I've heard Trish getting called "her" by a lot of people... [[Special:Contributions/75.58.122.97|75.58.122.97]] ([[User talk:75.58.122.97|talk]]) 22:21, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 
::As well as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trishula#Other_uses this article being mentioned "her"] allot. --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font></span>]][[User talk:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">r</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:black;"><font size"2">e</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">d</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">C</font></span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">a</font></span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="2">t</font></span>]]</span> 23:17, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Most people I know refer to Trishula as a "her". And yes, I do feel that she appears to be female. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  17:07, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
IDK might have to do with the fact that most people refer to the card as "Trish" sounds feminine to me...
 
 
Shinkirou 21:45, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
==Scapegoat==
 
I want to discuss this card. I don't understand why it has been limited for so long. Goat Control is beyond dead, and with all of these mass removal effects floating around, it just seems like it's not that great anymore. Sure, you can use it with a Tuner to Synchro for almost anything you want, but Xyz Monsters are taking over anyways. Thoughts? --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  03:02, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
There's enough stall in this game. Soon you'll be able to fill a deck with nothing but stall.<br>
 
[[Special:Contributions/121.222.170.239|121.222.170.239]] ([[User talk:121.222.170.239|talk]]) 22:27, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Most people consider stalling to be a sub-par strategy in this day and age. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  22:32, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
The stall isn't that bad anymore, with more cards that pierce and easier ways to get rid of the tokens. I think the main concern is Synchros, so maybe it could have a chance of semi-limit now that Konami has smacked our best tuners and Synchro monsters. Personally, I'm perfectly fine with it at one though. [[Special:Contributions/75.58.122.97|75.58.122.97]] ([[User talk:75.58.122.97|talk]]) 22:31, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Agreed. I could see it going to 2, since it wouldn't really affect the game. I'll put it as Low chance of getting less restricted I think. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  06:43, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:: and there are much more piercing monsters now. <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 07:44, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::Just because there are more doesn't mean people run them. How many piercing monsters do you run? I don't think I run any in any deck I play.
 
:::If that was a good enough reason to bring back cards:
 
:::There's many ways to destroy monsters, [[Yata-Garasu]] and [[Goyo Guardian]] should come back.
 
:::There's many ways to stop effects, [[Tribe-Infecting Virus]] should come back.
 
:::There are many ways to prevent destruction, [[Harpie's Feather Duster]] and [[Raigeki]] should come back.
 
:::These examples may be a bit extreme but you get the idea.
 
:::[[Special:Contributions/121.222.170.239|121.222.170.239]] ([[User talk:121.222.170.239|talk]]) 10:30, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::I see the idea, but those were all banned, while Goat is at 1. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  17:03, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:::::Unlike most of the ones you mentioned, [[Scapegoat]] does not tend to be a "play it and win" or "play it and get unstoppable advantage" card. [[Special:Contributions/75.58.122.97|75.58.122.97]] ([[User talk:75.58.122.97|talk]]) 18:48, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::::I see you missed the part where I said "These examples may be a bit extreme but you get the idea."
 
::::::[[Special:Contributions/121.222.170.239|121.222.170.239]] ([[User talk:121.222.170.239|talk]]) 07:37, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
==Those Formerly Forbidden==
 
You haven't listed the reasons for [[Creature Swap]], [[Emergency Provisions]], [[Light and Darkness Dragon]], [[Mage Power]], [[Phantom of Chaos]] and the [[Gadget]]s at 2. I suppose this thread's name doesn't mention "Semi-Limited", but you did list [[Apprentice Magician]] and [[Morphing Jar 2|Morphing Jar #2]] so I'm not sure.
 
* Creature Swap/Mage Power: Too strong. Returned after revisionism.
 
* Green/Red/Yellow Gadget: Gadgets were topping. Now they're not.
 
* Emergency Provisions: Abused with [[Mirage of Nightmare]].
 
* Light and Darkness Dragon: [[Perfect Circle]].
 
* Phantom of Chaos: Overhype? I don't know the environment from that time.
 
[[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 20:08, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Well, I'd like to think that "Limited" implies that Semi-Limited is included in this case. Anyways, I can go ahead and add some reasons for those cards. I'm not sure about Phantom of Chaos either. I imagine it has to do with Sky Scourge decks. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  02:10, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
heres a reason for PoC: was abused in norelras and demise decks to create a yata-lock-like situation or in fusion decks with hard-to-summon materials (sacred beasts,VWXYZ) [[User:LaserGhost|LG]] [[User talk:LaserGhost|talk]] [[User:LaserGhost/Pesronal Guides|My own Guides]] 04:59, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
==A nice reminder==
 
I would just like to remind all of you that YOU CAN EDIT THE LIST AS LONG AS YOU DON'T SCREW IT UP! But I will delete anything I feel shouldn't be here. kthnx. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  05:20, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
:Made some constructive edits. It's almost impossible to edit the list on Internet Explorer because the size of the page slows the editor to a crawl. As a sidenote, I believe [[Solemn Warning]] can negate more cards than [[Royal Oppression]]. [[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 16:56, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
::Okay, thank you. The additions look pretty legit. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  02:40, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::: Added [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit&section=1}} section edit for the list]. That way it'll only load the list, and not this discussion area. So less to load = less lag.
 
::: <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 04:03, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
::::Thank you Falzar! I actually didn't know that was possible. Also, at some point, is there a way to archive some of the discussion? It's starting to get a little lengthy. It's not an immediate problem but I wanted to know if it can be done for the future. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  04:09, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::: Might as well. <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 04:16, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::::::Thanks again. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  04:52, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Glow Up Bulb/Spore ==
 
 
I think that both of these should be changed to Low, Konami seems to be going through a phase of disliking reusable Tuner monsters and both of these fit the bill; [[Glow-Up Bulb]] is obvious, and [[Spore]] can still be used in combination with [[Lonefire Blossom]]. [[Special:Contributions/108.196.206.15|108.196.206.15]] ([[User talk:108.196.206.15|talk]]) 20:17, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Sounds like a plan. I don't really see them as being that broken personally. I can see them coming back at some point. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  23:14, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Most like never return - as they abused to shit out Quasar Dragon onto the field then punch the hell out of opponent's face if played right. Either ban Quasar or forget them. --<span style="font:10pt 'Bookman Old Style'">[[User:FredCat100/Smily Faces|<span style="color:#000">i</span>]][[User:FredCat100|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">F</span>]][[User talk:FredCat100#top|<span style="color:#000">r</span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:#000">e</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:#000">d</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">C</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:#000">a</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:#000">t</span>]]</span> 23:16, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::I completely disagree. Most Plant decks opted not to run Quasar. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  23:20, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== About Rescue Cat ==
 
 
IMO [[Rescue Cat]] should NEVER EVER leave the list. Mainly because [[Unifolia, Holy Beast of the Forest|this card]] from REDU. I mean, Cat (or [[Summoner Monk|Monk]] into Cat) -> Unifolia + [[XX-Saber Darksoul|Darksoul]] -> Cat + Darksoul -> ... -> [[Naturia Beast|Beast]] + [[Naturia Barkion|Barkion]] + a couple of searches by Darksouls. That's too scary ._." --<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">Brunjox</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''talk''</span>]],[[Special:Contributions/Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''contrib''</span>]])</sup> 11:43, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Alternatively, a zombified version of the [[Last Will]] Rescue Cat OTK. If you remember that, feel free to tremble now. --[[User:Gadjiltron|Gadjiltron]] ([[User talk:Gadjiltron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gadjiltron|contribs]]) 12:29, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
if only trishula was still here, it mneans 2 searches + 2700 beater + banishing 3 cards from 3 diffirent places. scary right?--[[User:LaserGhost|LaserGhost]] ([[User talk:LaserGhost|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LaserGhost|contribs]]) 12:45, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Very scary indeed. I do remember the Last Will/Rescue Cat combo, but the OTK with Unifolia is even scarier, because it's a possible OTK AND a Spell/Trap lockdown if you go first. Just set some backrow (the [[Solemn Judgment|Solemn]] [[Solemn Warning|brigade]] or other stuff) and it's game - ALL THANKS TO 1 CARD (Cat) or 2 (Monk and a Spell) in hand. --<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">Brunjox</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''talk''</span>]],[[Special:Contributions/Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''contrib''</span>]])</sup> 13:00, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Card of Safe Return ==
 
 
This card should go to NEVER because it should NEVER i say NEVER Come back. Something like infernities,X-sabers,Zombies, Wind-ups,frogs,synchrons and Lavals will overly spam this. NEVER Come back.--[[User:LaserGhost|LaserGhost]] ([[User talk:LaserGhost|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LaserGhost|contribs]]) 16:35, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
* You're right except for the "[[Infernity]]" archetype, who wouldn't gain any advantage from that card. Also, "[[Dark World]]" anyone? ([[Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World|Grapha]]/[[Sillva, Warlord of Dark World|Sillva]]/[[Goldd, Wu-Lord of Dark World|Goldd]]/[[Beiige, Vanguard of Dark World|Beeige]]/etc.) --<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">Brunjox</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''talk''</span>]],[[Special:Contributions/Brunjox|<span style="color:#32CD32">''contrib''</span>]])</sup> 17:50, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
I used CoSR with 3 stardust and/or stardust assault modes to lock down their everything basically.
 
 
[[User:Kordeleski|Kordeleski]] ([[User talk:Kordeleski|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kordeleski|contribs]]) 21:59, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Ever with [[Hieratic]], if some Dragons are in the Graveyard, they can abusing with this card by reborn either Sealed version or Level 6 Normal Dragon ([[Luster Dragon 2]]) with enough of hand to recycle for next combines. --<span style="font:10pt 'Bookman Old Style'">[[User:FredCat100/Smily Faces|<span style="color:#000">i</span>]][[User:FredCat100|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">F</span>]][[User talk:FredCat100#top|<span style="color:#000">r</span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:#000">e</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:#000">d</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">C</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:#000">a</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:#000">t</span>]]</span> 22:06, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Definitely right, with the exception of Infernities. Infernities would never use it, it would just be a liability. Fableds on the other hand.... i'll cal this one a NEVER. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  02:39, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
==Elemental HERO Stratos==
 
I think this card should be Chance of Up to Forbidden List. Not only it is +1, searching for Elemental HERO Neos Alius for HERO Beat Deck, but also, A HERO Lives Deck has taken over entire OCG Tournament. With XYZ available, it is now even easy to send Stratos back to Grave, only to be reused by Call of the Haunted or Monster Reborn again.--[[Special:Contributions/98.198.189.74|98.198.189.74]] ([[User talk:98.198.189.74|talk]]) 04:43, August 13, 2012 (UTC)A Nerd Next Door--[[Special:Contributions/98.198.189.74|98.198.189.74]] ([[User talk:98.198.189.74|talk]]) 04:43, August 13, 2012 (UTC){{Infobox}}
 
 
I disagree. I think Stratos should be brought back to 2 because of the many cards that can stop it, for example Thunder king, warning, judgment, veiler to name a few. It should't be brought back to 3 but it should at least go to 2.
 
[[Special:Contributions/99.100.171.71|99.100.171.71]] ([[User talk:99.100.171.71|talk]]) 05:15, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== September 2012 ==
 
 
== UPDATE ==
 
 
http://shriek.twoday.net/stories/129655023
 
The September 2012 banlist has been confirmed. On September 1st or 2nd, I will mass-update this list, including the new cards, new reasons for certain cards being where they are, and whether or not those cards have a chance of going up or down. I would appreciate it if everyone leaves this alone until then since there's no use discussing it with the format change so close, and there's no point in adding the new stuff before the list takes effect. Thank you kindly for your patience. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  08:59, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
What?!?!
 
 
So does this mean you can't have these cards period?  Because I was planning in getting Trishula and I already have Cyber Jar, Magician of Faith, and Giant Trunade.  What should I do now?  Throw them away?! [[User:SwordoftheSpirit|SwordoftheSpirit]] ([[User talk:SwordoftheSpirit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SwordoftheSpirit|contribs]]) 01:28, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Yes, you are allowed to have them. You just can't put them in your deck. [[User:PHASE|PHASE]] ([[User talk:PHASE|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PHASE|contribs]]) 01:57, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
At all or can I use them if I say Duel my brother?  Or a friend who will agree to let me use them? [[User:SwordoftheSpirit|SwordoftheSpirit]] ([[User talk:SwordoftheSpirit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SwordoftheSpirit|contribs]]) 02:48, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
If your opponent is okay with it then sure, we have [[Traditional Format]] don't we? [[User:PHASE|PHASE]] ([[User talk:PHASE|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PHASE|contribs]]) 03:07, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Question for Skull, what're you going to put as the reason for Spore being at 1? A large number of people agree there's no point it being at one, you think it was just Konami being Konami?<br>
 
[[Special:Contributions/58.169.183.228|58.169.183.228]] ([[User talk:58.169.183.228|talk]]) 12:57, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Pretty much - Konami is being silly, but also clever - if we get Spore back to unlimited (ever with it effect limited itself to once per duel), it can evade "D.D. Crow", any banish cards that ripping this card out of anywhere. It's like you tried to "Mystical Space Typhoon" the "Infernity Launcher", then see Infernity player miracle drew second Launcher. That's worth the trouble. --<span style="font:10pt 'Bookman Old Style'">[[User:FredCat100/Smily Faces|<span style="color:#000">i</span>]][[User:FredCat100|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">F</span>]][[User talk:FredCat100#top|<span style="color:#000">r</span>]][[User:FredCat100/friends|<span style="color:#000">e</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|<span style="color:#000">d</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation|<span style="font-size:13pt;color:#000">C</span>]][[User:FredCat100/Research|<span style="color:#000">a</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|<span style="color:#000">t</span>]]</span> 13:05, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Except that everyone knows you chain Crow to Spore's effect, so that it's still been activated. [[User:Lappyzard|Lappyzard]] ([[User talk:Lappyzard|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lappyzard|contribs]]) 14:56, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
soooo...when are you going to edit the list?<small>''—This unsigned comment was made by [[User:‎ Inuyasha205  |‎ Inuyasha205  ]] ([[User talk:‎ Inuyasha205  |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/‎ Inuyasha205  |contribs]])  18:14, September 3, 2012 (UTC)''</small>
 
 
: I don't play competitively any more so I'm not sure why the cards are hit. I think I've mentioned that other people can edit the list as long as they know the table syntax. (Or post the reasons below) <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 00:50, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
"Wind-Up Carrier Zenmaity" is the first Xyz Monster to be in the list, so it's the first time to have a card with the black color in the table... I can't read it because the font is also black xD. --[[User:Missign0|Missign0]] ([[User talk:Missign0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missign0|contribs]]) 13:39, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
: The colours are the same as [http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/limited/ what Konami use], so fixed. <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 14:11, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
[[Pot of Duality]] and agent of earth has not been listed 
 
 
[[User:Matthew Lightbody|[email protected]]] ([[User talk:Matthew Lightbody|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Matthew Lightbody|contribs]]) 09:51, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:A number of cards have not yet been listed. Add the hits to HERO decks and Seal of Convocation to those, then there're probably still more. [[Special:Contributions/108.196.206.15|108.196.206.15]] ([[User talk:108.196.206.15|talk]]) 19:41, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
I ended up procrastinating pretty badly on this. I'm not sure what all got updated here if anything. Anyone wanna fill me in so I can knock this out tonight? --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  21:47, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Guess someone did end up taking care of it. Sorry about the procrastination on my part. Just did a little cleanup and updating. --> ''<b>[[User:Skullvarnish|Summoned Skull 2:]] [[User talk:Skullvarnish|Electric Boogaloo]]</b>''  03:12, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
==Deck Devastation Virus==
 
This card is not listed here and would like to know why it was limited/semi limited.--[[User:Rasengan0|Rasengan0]] ([[User talk:Rasengan0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rasengan0|contribs]]) 00:46, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
To be honest, I'm also stumped as well. Anyone know what the meta was like from April 2005 to September 2007 (the time when DDV was Limited, then Semi)? --[[User:Gadjiltron|Gadjiltron]] ([[User talk:Gadjiltron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gadjiltron|contribs]]) 05:02, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
My guess is that it could stop commonly used searchers like [[Sangan]], [[Giant Rat]], etc. [[Special:Contributions/71.59.8.64|71.59.8.64]] ([[User talk:71.59.8.64|talk]]) 21:14, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
Hmm, I don't know about 2005, but by 2006, Dark Magician of Chaos floated around.
 
 
CCV+DDV (With Sangan and DMoC) kills Deck.<small>''—This unsigned comment was made by [[User: 98.198.189.74 | 98.198.189.74 ]] ([[User talk: 98.198.189.74 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ 98.198.189.74 |contribs]])  21:14, October 29, 2012‎ (UTC)''</small>
 
 
== black whirlwind and some other cards ==
 
 
Black whirlwind should go to 2, scapegoat should go to 2 or 3, Ojama trio should go to 3, shooting quasar dragon should be banned or at one (because double quasar is too overpowered), rekindling should be limited or semi because it can easily get shooting quasar dragon and lead to an easy one turn kill and if its on the first turn, there's not really much you can do (except super polymerization, that's the only thing that can stop it), premature burial might be able to go back to one because brionac is forbidden and giant trunade is forbidden but there's still probably some comboes with it, and is tsukuyomi going to stay at one , go back to banned, or go to 3? Is anyone using tsukuyomi?
 
:Hmm...I don't know what to think of Tsukuyomi, it's not bad, but if it was at 2 or 3, it might be too good for certain loops or combos. I think we could change Premature Burial to "Low" from very low, since Brio got banned last September, but Dewloren, Tiger King of the Ice Barrier, Falcon of Mist Valley, and Hidden Armory (all rarely used) could still abuse it to an extent. I'm not sure if Spore is going back to 0 or going to 3 again, but it's pointless to keep it at one, because no one runs more than one anyways. Shooting Quasar is never going to get banned because it's hard to drop. Konami is only going to hit the cards that can summon him with ease (See Fishborg Blaster), and even with 3 rekindlings, Lavals still aren't consistent enough to drop Quasar first turn all the time, so I wouldn't mention them unless they get some overpowering search card in the future. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 23:07, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Low chances ==
 
 
Why is it that ít never says there is a high chance of something occuring? The author basicly agrees with konami in every individual case--[[User:Quick Ninja|Quick Ninja]] ([[User talk:Quick Ninja|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Quick Ninja|contribs]]) 16:01, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
 
It seems to me the author isn't trying to claim what should be forbidden/limited/semi/unlimited, but instead trying to predict konami's actions regarding card restrictions.
 
[[Special:Contributions/74.78.1.129|74.78.1.129]] ([[User talk:74.78.1.129|talk]]) 03:30, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Dark Magician of Chaos ==
 
 
I wanted to discuss this card briefly. It says in the forbidden list that it has a "Low" chance of coming back because Dimension Fusion is banned, but should that be changed to Very Low, or perhaps Never? There are many ''new'' loops, combos, and OTKs with this card now, especially with the release of the prophecy archetype, and anything that can special summon DMoC becomes an instant +1. I don't think it has a "Low" chance of coming back. Should it be changed?
 
 
Explain this new "loop" or "combo" for the Prophecy, as there's only ONE card that can create the DMoC loop (Dimension Fusion, and guess what? it's banned). It won't make Prophecies broken, in fact, it's going to HELP the deck further. So no, it has a low chance of being unbanned. [[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 21:36, February 22, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous [[Special:Contributions/75.40.243.231|75.40.243.231]] ([[User talk:75.40.243.231|talk]]) 13:37, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== March 2013 ==
 
 
[http://shriek.twoday.net/stories/264160796/ The March 2013 banlist has been leaked] on Shriek news. It's also on the [[Forum:March 2013 Banlist Predictions]] page. Here is everything:
 
 
Banned:
 
*Sangan
 
*Wind-up Carrier Zenmaighty
 
Limited:
 
*Wind-up Magician
 
*One day of Peace
 
*Solemn Warning
 
Semi-Limited:
 
*Advanced Ritual Art
 
*Thunder King Rai-oh
 
*Tsukuyomi
 
Unlimited:
 
*Spore
 
*Blackwing - Kalut the moon shadow
 
*Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner
 
*Shien's Smoke Signal
 
*Mind Crush
 
 
It won't be official until March 1st, but just posed it as a heads up. Don't change anything until then. [[Special:Contributions/24.12.202.163|24.12.202.163]] ([[User talk:24.12.202.163|talk]]) 16:40, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
:And the list is now TCG official (http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/limited/index.html). Updated everything rescently, but not sure about where some cards should go, such as
 
*Thunder King - Maybe, say, Low Chance of ↓
 
*Rabbit - Still not sure? maybe Low chance of ↑?
 
*Tsukuyomi - perhaps Low Chance of ↓
 
*Advanced Ritual Art - Not really sure on this one.
 
*Smoke signal - maybe =, Low chance of ↑
 
Any thoughts on some of these? [[Special:Contributions/24.12.202.163|24.12.202.163]] ([[User talk:24.12.202.163|talk]]) 17:57, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Some opinion changes ==
 
 
I'd like to say Dark Strike Fighter should never come back, because it's too powerful. If you drop it in a Hazy deck, it's game over (As long as there's Rekindling around). I doubt this will be changed, but again, just an opinion.
 
 
I don't see why DMoC should remain banned, as the only reason why he's banned is because of the Dimension Fusion loop, and that card is banned for good. So I think DMoC has a low chance of getting himself unbanned, and if he gets unbanned, then Dimension Fusion should never come back. (Even without DMoC, this card is too powerful)
 
 
Black Luster Soldier, IMO, isn't going to get hit anytime soon, so I guess it should stay at 1 for now. (But, chances are, it's going to get banned eventually)
 
 
Dark Armed should stay at one, it's only broken when there's more than one copy. However, it's not powerful enough to get himself banned.
 
 
Deck Devastation Virus is fine at 3, although it can be better than Crush Card Virus, as it takes out a lot of important cards (I.e: Tour guide, Rescue Rabbit, ect...)
 
 
[[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 22:04, February 22, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous
 
 
I'm not sure what should be on the unsure cards, since they could go either way, though most of them will probrably come down from where they are, except for Rabbit.
 
 
I wouldn't want to say DSF is never, ever going to come back, but chances are it won't happen for a while no matter what, if ever. He (along with some former cards and other cards that would folow) went from 3 to 0 instantly. Trying him at one first would've probrably been a better move back then, but I personally don't think DSF is coming back either way.
 
 
BLS will probrably get re-banned someday, but probrably not until Konami designs some stupid card that can overly-abuse him (like Uniflora, Mythical Beast of the Forest for Rescue Cat...main reason why it's never coming back). I agree DAD is fine where he is, so long as some old cards (like the aforementioned D-Fusion), don't come back.
 
 
DMoC can't come back because there's always going to be some ridiculous OTK/FTK loop someone comes up with him. Being able to reuse a spell card no one wants to see more than once per duel (and at no cost with DMoC) is gamebreaking enough as it is, but there are countless ways to special summon him; cards like Escape from the Dark Dimension, Different Dimension Reincarnation, Return from the Different Dimension, Monster Reborn (then return Reborn to your hand)...it doesn't matter if Dimension Fusion is banned, someone will find a way to spam/abuse DMoC if he comes back, and we're back to square one again. As a matter of fact, with Prophecies getting stronger at the moment due to the release of the Divine Judgment of the Spellbooks spell card, I personally would call DMoC a never.
 
 
I could see Deck Devy getting hit again at some point, due to the increasing number of decks that rely on weaker monsters (Sangan ban, hint hint), but the only deck it's really seen in is Dark Worlds, which aren't topping anyways. If it sees more play in other decks which are topping I think a chance of going up would be necessary for Deck Devy. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 00:42, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
Mass Driver is banned, Dark Strike is a Mass Driver/Cannon Soldier on steroids. And with decks that can drop high level monsters without a sweat drop (Example: Haze decks), it should stay banned.
 
 
As for DMoC: Dimension Fusion can return to the hand via DMoC's effect, this is what made him overpowered. Escape from the Dark Dimension is a trap, and it's definitely not useful. Dimension Reincarnation has a discard cost, it still won't make any difference as it can't create a loop. Return is the exact same reason for Escape, it's a trap card; not a spell card. How could you abuse Reborn if DMoC is banished when it leaves the field? Imperial Iron Wall is just a silly logic: If that's what you're saying, then by that logic: Imperial Iron Wall is broken; Not DMoC (Quillbot Hedgehog loop?). Those are just silly reasons, no offense. As for the Prophecies growing powerful, we'll just see when they're topping, but this lately: It isn't. (Mainly because they're ridiculously expensive)
 
I've checked out Spellbook of Judgment, still no differences on DMoC's major impact.
 
 
I doubt DDV will get hit, as it's a replacement for CCV. But yeah, Dark World are one of the few decks that uses DDV. Still don't think it will ever get hit IMO. [[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 03:59, February 23, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous
 
:I'm not exactly saying DMoC will be abused by every one of those cards, but my point is, it creates many deadly loops and combos by itself, and someone ''will'', and probrably won't be afraid to, find a way to spam him even without Dimension Fusion. I mean, being able to reuse any one of your limited spells for free (Avarice, Storm, Hole, Reborn, Mind Control, Book of Moon, Allure of Darkness, ect) is something I (and many others) just can't get over. D-Fusion can't create as many loops with DMoC anyways since 2000 LP is quite a hefty cost to use it and your opponent may benefit from it too. Not to say D-Fusion isn't broken (it shouldn't come back), but just because D-Fusion is banned doesn't mean DMoC isn't broken anymore. The Imperial Iron Wall+DMoC+Monster Reborn+Cannon Soldier otk is just one of many otk's/loops I can see him doing if he comes back (again, not saying Iron Wall is the problem, but DMoC is). And yes DDR has a discard cost, but DMoC then returns a spell card from your graveyard to your hand, so it basically becomes a costless card that can revive him, much better than D-Fusion. I'd be more than happy to run 3 of those if DMoC came back. While Prophecy decks are expensive, I don't want to think DMoC won't have a major impact on the deck because it probrably will, most of us don't see it though. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 13:24, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
        How would it combo and loop itself? Again, I still see no point of his abuse. All of the cards that can SS monsters from the banished zone is just a silly reason: I don't see how any of them can create FTK/OTKs with DMoC. You can't reuse a lot of limited spell cards for "free", he needs to be tribute summon or ss using certain cards. Besides, Magical Stone Excavation is a better option than DMoC's effect, and it's not even banned (But Semi-Limited of course). Any cards that Special summons him requires a cost: DoL&D needs a Dark Magician on the field (Or someone who's named is Dark Magician); A crap ton of cards that can summon him NEEDS a cost. And, about D-Fusion's cost: People used Spell Economics to bypass his cost, part of the reasons why people abuse the crap out of him. Why are you bringing up the Imperial Iron Wall and Reborn argument? Ever heard of a Quillbolt Loop? http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Quillbolt_Loop
 
Again, by that logic, Imperial Iron Wall is broken; Not DMoC. That, and that loop is too slow for the meta. Dimension Reincarnation ITSELF is an EQUIP spell card, yes, it brings back a spell card as a replacement for the cost, but you can't keep doing the same move every time like D-Fusion. Prophecies are powerful, that I have to agree with, but they're quite slow, not even DMoC can help speed up the deck. (Mainly because most of the spells has a "Activate this card once per turn" condition)
 
 
Overall, DMoC is still slow for the current meta, and I doubt he would become broken. And yes, someone will try to find a way to make him deadly, but, guaranteed, they will fail. [[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 14:41, February 23, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous
 
:Just to clarify what I said, I never said people WOULD definitely use those cards for sure if DMoC did return, but my point was DMoC isn't "not good anymore" just because D-Fusion is banned. No one runs Magical Stone Excavation anymore; Discarding 2 cards from your hand to use it is a cost that is too steep for most of today's decks to handle; it's probrably going to come up to 3 at some point in the future, maybe September 2013 format. I personally have a hard time believing there won't be something gamebreaking about a powerful lv 8 monster that let's you reuse any spell card from your graveyard every time it's special summoned, and banishes any monster it destroys in battle. I agree that DMoC would not be as broken as he was before with Dimension Fusion now banned, but that doesn't mean DMoC can come back and not impact the meta that much. You may not see it, but there is going to be some annoying loop someone will come up with DMoC if he comes back, and I would rather not find out what it is. The whole point behind this was in the list above, DMoC is listed as "Very Low". Would you prefer to change that to "Low" instead? I know he wouldn't be as good as he was before, but again, that doesn't mean he "wouldn't be good" if he came back. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 19:41, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
Yes, I'm aware that very few people runs Magical Stone these days, I'm just saying it's basically like DMoC, but a better option to regain/reuse spells than him.
 
All what I'm trying to say, is that DMoC only had a single powerful card that can create his loop. Besides, he's not a Chaos Emperor Dragon; he's just another monster that's too slow and isn't broken for this current meta.
 
I've never said he's not a good monster though; I'm just saying, that he isn't going to create an impact to the meta now. Besides, DMoC is banished when he leaves, and there's very little cards that can bring him back from the banished zone, so like I said: Making a loop with DMoC again is going to be IMPOSSIBLE, and even if it's possible, it's definitely going to be extremely slow. In other words: Whoever will try to find a way to create a "new" DMoC loop... well... good luck for him/her. [[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 00:52, February 24, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous
 
:It isn't impossible to create loops with DMoC, but you're right, it would be slow. One example of an FTK loop with him would be something like this:
 
 
*On your first turn, Hand Destruction DMoC and Mezuki. Then normal summon Cannon Soldier and activate Zombie World. Banish Mezuki from your grave to bring DMoC back, tribute DMoc with Cannon Soldier (DMoC is banished) to do 500 damage. Then activate Burial from the different Dimension to return DMoC and Mezuki to your graveyard. Banish Mezuki again to bring DMoC back again, return Burial to your hand with DMoC's effect, tribute him again with Cannon Soldier for 500 more damage, repeat until Victory.
 
 
Again, such a loop is situational and not always consistent (like the Ouroboros hand loop in six sams), but it still exists nontheless and Konami hates OTK's and FTK's (well, we all do), so they hit the cards that can do the loops. Hell Magician of Faith is more likely to be unbanned than DMoC because flip effect monsters will most likely be blown up before they get a chance to use their effects in today's metagame. DMoC is spammable and can create annoying loops with certain spell cards, and even though DMoC may come back, I wouldn't expect it to happen myself nontheless. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 14:38, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
You'd be lucky if you managed to draw Zombie World, DMoC, Mezuki, Hand Destruction, and Burial from the DD. DMoC, Mezuki, and Burial are at ONE (Well... if DMoC will ever get unbanned, then it will most likely go to 1), and you have a ratio of 3/40 chance of drawing the cards you needed. That's like saying I can draw all 5 pieces of Exodia first turn.
 
I'm going to keep saying this for the last time: It's IMPOSSIBLE to create a DMoC loop now. Even if there are cards that can create a DMoC loop, it's just going to become too slow for the current meta. Besides, we have a ton of loops that are faster and powerful than DMoC, like the Evigiski Mind Augus, 2 Garunix, and even the Lightpulsar + REDMD.
 
So I'll stop repeating this, until it's understood. Besides, he isn't a threat to the Meta, he isn't a Chaos Emperor Dragon, and Magician of Fate is faster on retrieving spell cards from the Graveyard than DMoC. (Especially when Tsukuyomi is unbanned.) So it wouldn't matter HOW you can create his loop, but rather WHEN.
 
Yet, I keep saying this over and over again: There's only FEW cards that can bring DMoC back from the graveyard, so there's still no evidence that he can create havoc in the meta. No more, and no less. [[Special:Contributions/24.164.39.82|24.164.39.82]] ([[User talk:24.164.39.82|talk]]) 16:39, February 24, 2013 (UTC) Anonymous
 
:You're right, I agree with you on the fact if someone tried to create a new spell loop with DMoC it most likely wouldn't be very consistent. However, that doesn't mean they don't exist. However, that's only my opinion, and my opinion is my own. I have to disagree with your comment on Magician of Faith though; you're much more likely to create a spell loop with DMoC than you are with Magician of Faith (no one even runs Tsukuyomi to begin with, so pointless to mention it), and it could die by a card effect (no surprise in today's meta) before it's flipped anyways. The Shallow Grave and Book of Taiyou also exist for Magician of Faith, but like Tsukuyomi, no one runs them in the first place either. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 22:49, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Ceasefire ==
 
Only problem I have with this is that it says Ceasefire needs a face-down monster to be activated, which isn't true. All the rulings I've found say it can be used for a face-up or face-down monster.
 
--[[User:MasterMarik|MasterMarik]] ([[User talk:MasterMarik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MasterMarik|contribs]]) 20:49, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Undecided cards ==
 
 
Does anyone have opinions on what should go in the undecided cards? Like T.G. Striker or Tsukuyomi or Thunder King? I'd say all of them with a chance of coming down, but I'm not sure if that's what'll happen to T-King. [[Special:Contributions/98.206.70.2|98.206.70.2]] ([[User talk:98.206.70.2|talk]]) 22:58, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 06:14, 24 November 2019


List[edit]

Edit the list
In case someone somehow missed it. Click "Show" on the right side of the bar.
This list is for the people who are curious about why certain cards are banned/limited.
This list can also assist people before posting a prediction on the next banlist.
Please help out by pointing out changes that should be made in the list (if any) (please include reasons).
And for those who are wondering. No, I didn't make this list recently. It been on 2 other forums before. This is the most updated version of it as the other 2 aren't being updated.
See also: Historic Forbidden/Limited Chart. --  Falzar FZ  talk page  useful stuff    07:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Archives: 1 2 3 4 Current discussion page.